I suppose the federal government must define marriage for certain things it must do - provide benefits for federal employees, grant tax breaks, count married couples for the census, etc.
We've made too many compromises already. Too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back. Not again! The line must be drawn here… THIS far, NO further!
If you lived in the US and had a basic understanding of our government you'd know states have always controlled marriage liscences and that the feds have no right to under the 10th amendment.
Time to kill the Republican party
They're doing a hell of a job killing themselves. They're giving the troons a run for their money.
They're threatening to jump off the ledge; I want to tip them over
Marriage officially has no definition per US Law
Supremes can't even define a woman...
The Republicans who voted to advance the bill are:
Roy Blunt of Missouri
Richard Burr of North Carolina
Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia
Susan Collins of Maine
Joni Ernst of Iowa
Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming
Lisa Murkowski of Alaska
Rob Portman of Ohio
Mitt Romney of Utah
Dan Sullivan of Alaska
Thom Tillis of North Carolina
Todd Young of Indiana
I’m guessing that this list is the same list of McConnell bitches that Ted Cruz was talking about on his podcast.
I recognise three of them from the list of RINOs who received donations stolen from FTX.
Imagine if the traitor caucus put as much effort into serving the base as they do serving the left.
Must be bad for Americans if it had bipartisan support.
Make of this how you wish.
Let me guess, only applied to Christians in practice, doesn't apply to Islam as they don't want to be afraid of their mail..
My respect for marriage has increase. Thankfully that is only between women and men.
12 republicans and 50 democrats is "bipartisan"
Technically no temporal government has authority over marriage as it falls under the purview of religion. The government simply recognizes it.
I suppose the federal government must define marriage for certain things it must do - provide benefits for federal employees, grant tax breaks, count married couples for the census, etc.
we're from the government and we're here to help!
The tenth amendment says otherwise
Sucks for them better move out of NY
Shit, good point. We better not let countries control marriage. Needs to be UN thing.
Don't need to run. I don't live in a place with anything remotely like NYC laws or demographics
I actually agree with you on this. At some point evil must be combated.
We've made too many compromises already. Too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds and we fall back. Not again! The line must be drawn here… THIS far, NO further!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jln3mi0vfJU
🤦♂️
Congrats, this is the dumbest thing I’ve read on the internet today.
Child rapist who got pregnant from the rape of a minor boy, is receiving payments from the "father" as mandated by the court.
That there is no marriage contract, but all the benefits of divorce, for a rapist should tell you all you need to know.
The sad thing about the Imp is that underneath all the ranting, there is an undeniable truth.
You realize the US has different governments with different authorities, right? (theoretically)
Imp needs a middle school civics class.
Well he is a foreigner
They're not sending their best.
Unless...
I must apologise for
Wimp LoImp One. We purposefully trained him to be a retard, as a joke!Imp and Antonio arguing about US law is one of my favorite sideshows around here. Neither one of them has spent five minutes subject to it.
If you lived in the US and had a basic understanding of our government you'd know states have always controlled marriage liscences and that the feds have no right to under the 10th amendment.
Whether or not they should, they do.
State government =/= federal
Incorrect. Also you support the shit in this retarded bill anyway
You bring up a good point, Imp does love the trannies.