Besides the lack of freedom of speech everyone already knows about, is it not illegal in the UK to make wild accusations about people to get them arrested? Is it not illegal for the police to arrest someone without evidence?
It's "guilty upon accusation with no statute of limitations and no exoneration possible under any circumstances". It's why they like campus tribunals and systems that are designed to circumvent the standard US justice system, which actually works fairly well a lot of the time.
It is only illegal if the accusation is of an actual real crime that actually took place, such as the young women who were arrested for daring to report that they were raped in Rotherham by an organized crime group affiliated by mutual religion.
My point is that she poses no real danger why treat posting online as you are a terrorist. I understand the ideological reasons but how did they manage to justify it?
Actually, some of the most high-profile people persecuted for anti-homo/troon 'hate speech' in England, or otherwise penalized, have been black. Certainly a disproportionate number.
Not sure that was because the only faithful Christians in England come from the outside, or because they intentionally brought them forward to avoid accusations.
I so hate that, words are violence - is such a ridiculous concept but now countries are designing laws for it. 5 mins ago we had "sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me"
"Words are violence" is a concept that can only exist when the demand for violence vastly outstrips the supply. If violence was as plentiful and common as they say it is, there wouldn't be people crying about words. Simple market assessment, they're using a substitute product.
No one in an active slave-ring bloodsport knife fight is saying "by refusing to say my pronouns, you're literally murdering me".
So if anything, we should congratulate them on their peace-privilege any time they say something like that.
It's not about a written constitution. The rest of Europe does have a written constitution, which counts for exactly nothing. They do whatever the hell they want and then call that "democracy".
I'd guess the offending post violated some hate-speech law. The accusers were trans, so the police didn't want to offend them and the accused was Christian, which many non-Christians seem to enjoy mortifying.
Too many eyes lets normalfags in. Clutter up threads with nonsense. They also see others poking bears and want in on the action too, without any idea of how to do so effectively. I've been watching GenoSamuel's Comprehensive History of Chris Chan, and around ep21, there's a dude who completely fails at trolling Chris. The easiest man in the world to troll and he just whiffs so painfully. That's the kind of person increased attention attracts, and enough of those will kill that site imo
At the end of the day, anyone sufficiently interested in lolcows and edrama already knew about the site, it was effectively gatekept. In the public eye, it's harder to do so. Not that I particularly care either way, I've never posted and only check it once or twice a year when there's some kerfuffle going on. Think the last time I looked was when Shadman got arrested. But it's the principle of the thing to me. KF feels like one of the last places the old internet can still exist
Trannies are prone to performative hysteria because 1) emotional imbalance brought on my hormone abuse and mental illness and 2) it is an effective tool for controlling people who are confused or scared. People are very much scared at the prospect of being summarily fired or prosecuted for any perceived infraction, so they leap to action in service of hysterical trannies.
We need to aggressively criminalize and prosecute abuses of our legal systems. False claims, lies under oath, misuse of law enforce resources - these offenses must become serious.
Besides the lack of freedom of speech everyone already knows about, is it not illegal in the UK to make wild accusations about people to get them arrested? Is it not illegal for the police to arrest someone without evidence?
And even then you're probably still guilty of something.
It's "guilty upon accusation with no statute of limitations and no exoneration possible under any circumstances". It's why they like campus tribunals and systems that are designed to circumvent the standard US justice system, which actually works fairly well a lot of the time.
All legal rules are thrown out the window if it means we can protect someone’s feelings.
It is only illegal if the accusation is of an actual real crime that actually took place, such as the young women who were arrested for daring to report that they were raped in Rotherham by an organized crime group affiliated by mutual religion.
How do they justify arresting people for this crap?
She didn't have her loicense for that post.
My point is that she poses no real danger why treat posting online as you are a terrorist. I understand the ideological reasons but how did they manage to justify it?
Because that is easier than chasing down and apprehending ACTUAL criminals. Plus the normies they arrest are all white, so no accusations of racism
Actually, some of the most high-profile people persecuted for anti-homo/troon 'hate speech' in England, or otherwise penalized, have been black. Certainly a disproportionate number.
Not sure that was because the only faithful Christians in England come from the outside, or because they intentionally brought them forward to avoid accusations.
Because they believe the words are violence bs
I so hate that, words are violence - is such a ridiculous concept but now countries are designing laws for it. 5 mins ago we had "sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me"
"Words are violence" is a concept that can only exist when the demand for violence vastly outstrips the supply. If violence was as plentiful and common as they say it is, there wouldn't be people crying about words. Simple market assessment, they're using a substitute product.
No one in an active slave-ring bloodsport knife fight is saying "by refusing to say my pronouns, you're literally murdering me".
So if anything, we should congratulate them on their peace-privilege any time they say something like that.
They have power and you don't. Therefore everything they do is good
Power, that's how.
Power is its own justification.
The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must.
It's not about a written constitution. The rest of Europe does have a written constitution, which counts for exactly nothing. They do whatever the hell they want and then call that "democracy".
I think the same thing can be said on most countries with a written constitution. It is just there for looks, as it's worth nothing.
I assume the UK police is run by Islamic Sharia police
Don't be silly. Islamic Sharia would be less repressive. They'd allow you to call a man a man.
that would unironically be an improvement.
I'd guess the offending post violated some hate-speech law. The accusers were trans, so the police didn't want to offend them and the accused was Christian, which many non-Christians seem to enjoy mortifying.
at this point.. its modern day witch hunt. accuse everyone of being racist or some poster on some obscure site lol.
KF now has 3x more users than before it was "dropped".
I can only hope they'll get bored and leave. A large userbase is only detrimental to a site like that
How so? Because too much crap gets posted? Then you allow only approved users to post.
Too many eyes lets normalfags in. Clutter up threads with nonsense. They also see others poking bears and want in on the action too, without any idea of how to do so effectively. I've been watching GenoSamuel's Comprehensive History of Chris Chan, and around ep21, there's a dude who completely fails at trolling Chris. The easiest man in the world to troll and he just whiffs so painfully. That's the kind of person increased attention attracts, and enough of those will kill that site imo
At the end of the day, anyone sufficiently interested in lolcows and edrama already knew about the site, it was effectively gatekept. In the public eye, it's harder to do so. Not that I particularly care either way, I've never posted and only check it once or twice a year when there's some kerfuffle going on. Think the last time I looked was when Shadman got arrested. But it's the principle of the thing to me. KF feels like one of the last places the old internet can still exist
Which KF is up and running other than Tor?
I haven't been able to access any of the alts since shit went down.
Just tried .top with no luck.
.net works just fine for the past few days
Thanks.
I haven't tried .net since the Cloudflare betrayal
UK police need to be rounded up by the population, drawn and quartered.
The police need to be abolished in the UK, everyone allowed swords and flintlock pistols and all disagreements should be settled by duels.
The UK needs to be abolished.
https://twitter.com/CF_Farrow/status/1577092705154666496
The Gestapo had higher standards than the jackbooted thugs in the British police.
Kiwifarms is illegal now?
She doesn't have a loicense for her opinions.
Trannies are prone to performative hysteria because 1) emotional imbalance brought on my hormone abuse and mental illness and 2) it is an effective tool for controlling people who are confused or scared. People are very much scared at the prospect of being summarily fired or prosecuted for any perceived infraction, so they leap to action in service of hysterical trannies.
We need to aggressively criminalize and prosecute abuses of our legal systems. False claims, lies under oath, misuse of law enforce resources - these offenses must become serious.
So, it's not Jerusalem, exactly, that's been built in England's green and pleasant land.
You can be arrested simply by an accusation that you can prove is false?
I like how this starts from the position that posting to a Brazilian lobster breeding forum is illegal.
Shit like this is why people want to smuggle guns in from the US to start a civil war.