My point is that she poses no real danger why treat posting online as you are a terrorist. I understand the ideological reasons but how did they manage to justify it?
Actually, some of the most high-profile people persecuted for anti-homo/troon 'hate speech' in England, or otherwise penalized, have been black. Certainly a disproportionate number.
Not sure that was because the only faithful Christians in England come from the outside, or because they intentionally brought them forward to avoid accusations.
I so hate that, words are violence - is such a ridiculous concept but now countries are designing laws for it. 5 mins ago we had "sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me"
"Words are violence" is a concept that can only exist when the demand for violence vastly outstrips the supply. If violence was as plentiful and common as they say it is, there wouldn't be people crying about words. Simple market assessment, they're using a substitute product.
No one in an active slave-ring bloodsport knife fight is saying "by refusing to say my pronouns, you're literally murdering me".
So if anything, we should congratulate them on their peace-privilege any time they say something like that.
She didn't have her loicense for that post.
My point is that she poses no real danger why treat posting online as you are a terrorist. I understand the ideological reasons but how did they manage to justify it?
Because that is easier than chasing down and apprehending ACTUAL criminals. Plus the normies they arrest are all white, so no accusations of racism
Actually, some of the most high-profile people persecuted for anti-homo/troon 'hate speech' in England, or otherwise penalized, have been black. Certainly a disproportionate number.
Not sure that was because the only faithful Christians in England come from the outside, or because they intentionally brought them forward to avoid accusations.
Because they believe the words are violence bs
I so hate that, words are violence - is such a ridiculous concept but now countries are designing laws for it. 5 mins ago we had "sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me"
"Words are violence" is a concept that can only exist when the demand for violence vastly outstrips the supply. If violence was as plentiful and common as they say it is, there wouldn't be people crying about words. Simple market assessment, they're using a substitute product.
No one in an active slave-ring bloodsport knife fight is saying "by refusing to say my pronouns, you're literally murdering me".
So if anything, we should congratulate them on their peace-privilege any time they say something like that.
They have power and you don't. Therefore everything they do is good