San Diego teacher defines 'fascist' to class as 'whites,' 'heterosexuals,' and 'Christians'
(www.washingtonexaminer.com)
Comments (49)
sorted by:
always meant "not promoting marxism to my satisfaction"
White men, non-degenerates, and Christians (real ones, not fake subverted "liberation" ones) are less likely to support marxism
But that is a message that our side needs to spread. When they say "fascist" and "Nazi" they mean EVERYONE who doesn't enthusiastically support them and kiss their ass. Neutrality is not an option, it is yet another relic from a more innocent time that the commies have destroyed.
As a Christian, it breaks my heart to see so many Christian denominations engaging in wokeness and degeneracy. On the up-side, it's really is separating the wheat from the chaff and forcing Christians to pick a side... their faith or this rapidly degenerating culture.
Protestants be like, "whatever feels good bro. it's all just love. we are all equal. now let's hear from our traditional butch lesbian pastor. God bless."
Catholics be like, "yeah, we gotta listen to the progressive, Argentinian pedophile, he's the representation of Christ on earth! Whatever words come from his mouth are like hearing directly from God. Until later Popes determine him to be a heretic. Then, we knew all along he wasn't REALLY of Christ. Not like this new guy we got that is TOTALLY the real thing this time."
I can see why they’re calling people fascists. They redefined it as ‘far right nationalism and those benefitting from their race’. They think everyone on the right is far right as everyone now’s an extremist if you don’t support transing the kids, nationalism’s still there, and they redefined racism, so in the minds of those using it, the term is accurate. Then they read over historical commentary against fascism differently and assume all the terrors of history they read associated with it are because people aren’t okay with late term abortion and like nationalism and are white.
They’re using it accurately within their circle that has redefined it.
Depends on how you define white, Proto-Iranians are classified under Caucasian, but it goes to show you how stupid the term “white” is
Again, the Caucasus Mountains from where Caucasian came from is Georgia/ Russia. These definitions make zero sense, it’s mass conglomeration of multiple continents of people.
Yeah those are white people. I don't understand the problem.
Naw I’ll stick with not being “white”
Arabs did not exist in that region for centuries after the death of Christ. Stop spouting lies some atheist Bolshevik in the 60s made up.
Jesus is literally a semite.
Based
And Republicans, that was a given
What happens when a typical r-politics commenter is allowed to teach children.
But parents are crazy for noticing this lunacy?
Noticing is NEVER the right thing to do!
Crap, I'm attracted to Fascists, well better go by some Hugo Boss and buy a Mercedes then...
Now, now, let's not jump to conclusions. Get this:
'"We were supposed to be learning how to make an argument for an argumentative essay," the student said. "And the first thing he turns to is that. Then, he just got to the definition of fascism and what he thinks. He put down the Nazi Party and the modern-day Republican Party, which is just ridiculous."'
I myself might use such a thesis in a class on argumentation. It provides the opportunity to research evidence for the claim and sure as shit would generate a substantial counter-claim. It would also encourage a competing definition of "fascism," illustrating the importance of stipulative and/or ostensive definitions. It may also serve as an illustration of the concept of argumentation as a method of arriving at truth.
Any arguments that raise blood-pressure and galvanize refutations can work very well as lessons in the rhetoric of argument and in recognizing bias in sources of researched information.
You might just as easily begin with a sample thesis coming from the Right.
How does the rest of the lesson on argumentation proceed, if at all? My guess is that the students complaining are providing only half the story. At least I hope so.
What you're describing here would be more in line with a formal debate or philosophy course.
This is a high school. Argumentative essays are very simplistic in that setting. You make a claim, explain the argument/provide evidence or examples to your claim for a few paragraphs, and then summarize and conclude. It's basically just getting your toes wet for researching, depending on the topic.
I hope the teacher followed through with a counter-claim at least, but I suppose these days anything goes in public schools.
When did you go to school, the 80s? Teachers are not to be questioned in Current Year schools, especially regarding the topic of politics. By the time they're in fourth grade, public school kids have already adopted an abused dog mindset: keep your head down, do what you're told, and hope your teacher isn't having a bad day and decides to take it out on you.
If a teacher says something, it's the truth. Regurgitate it come exam time or fail, and probably get accused of being a white supremacist.
This is only true of white students. Teachers are actually powerless in the face of belligerent black students.
Well, you're not wrong there. But those "students" aren't exactly itching to open a critical dialogue with their teacher either.
I was in HS from 75-78.
I taught composition and rhetoric in a few California universities and community colleges from 1997-2017. That's where my reply comes from.
I know the state of US public schools. Believe it or not there are some private Catholic schools that still teach without all the "social-emotional learning" BS and other woke indoctrination.
If home-schooling is not an option, I'd rather American kids be encouraged to believe Catholicism in the context of a real education rather than be force-fed the social justice catechism all the time in every subject.
Bet you that teacher has a nose that almost scrapes the board from five feet away.
And what are any of these parents going to do about it? What's that? Literally nothing? Well then enjoy watching your child get raped to death by the vibrant diversity they were too brainwashed to avoid.
you're free to leave. in fact you should be made to.
“Fascism” has been nothing more than an anti-nationalist smear since umberto eco created his retarded “14 features”.
There are private schools that do financial aid, and there are public schools that are less Marxist. Every parent has a choice, but some of them involve sacrifice. You would think that the last thing parents would want to sacrifice is their children, but I also support fighting versus running. Just do something.
One islamic sect destroys another islamic sect, especially if its degenerate or liberal.
Write white women, coward.
They always weasel out of saying it.
Why would he write white women? Women are pro marxism, he is most likely to put men on it but it would be awkward.
Because "whites" implies white women too, but they're never included when groups are vilified.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This doesn't actually do that.
Leftists politics are centered on eternal strife. They can never admit they are actually in control of everything because then our problems can be correctly attributed to leftist policies. The game is to ruthlessly wield statist power against us while disingenuously pretending that we are somehow holding the reins.