That's totally different. The judge ruled that there can't be multiple punishments for the same crime, not that there can't be multiple punishments for no crime at all.
Are you arguing they treated Chauvin fairly? 2nd degree murder and manslaughter are mutually exclusive. If the law was fair and blind, he couldn't have been charged and convicted of both at the same time. He also shouldn't have been charged at all, given Floyd died of an overdose.
Well, on Chauvin, they're at least concurrent sentences.
That's not what happened to Chauvin. He was charged and convicted of both 2nd degree murder and manslaughter. Murder implies intent to kill. Manslaughter implies there is NO intent to kill. They both can't be true at the same time.
Yes. I'm am describing how he is serving the sentence for both convictions at the same time, not one after the other. This does not contradict the fact that the elements of manslaughter and Murder 2 are mutually exclusive; that fact just points out that juries are stupid and politically motivated.
Just for literally all the other elements of the case. I think my "favorite" is how the AG refused to accept a guilty plea to 2nd degree murder, and forced him to go through the trial. It wasn't about justice, it was about corpse-standing for political gain.
Do you have problem with comprehension? He's accused of six intentional murders and not "homicide by vehicle, use of a controlled substance" in addition to these 6 separate murders.
How are the parents of the children mutilated not on fire in that city? How is there not some furious father out there to bring righteous justice on the evil dancing on their pain and tragedy?
Leftists are unbelievably sick, depraved monsters.
If he doesn't get life without parole, that judge runs a very real risk of getting murdered. Brooks took everything from multiple people who now have nothing to lose. Letting him off light would be a horrible idea.
The charges were 'just-in-case' they can't convict on the first degree intentional, they can still get him for the lesser. And, yes, you can be be found guilty of multiple charges and multiple variations if the jury finds you meet the legal definition of those charges.
This was a way to clear the man of the more severe charges. The judge knows this and granted the defense's motion so that his client won't get convicted of murder. The challenge is used by defense attorneys for black criminals successfully all across blue shitholes playing to these activist judges with an extreme liberal bias.
Women are entirely unsuited to be judges, as evidenced by a concocted "parallel" moral development path to skirt around the fact that women never develop a sense of justice and instead only develop compassion.
Waukesha County Judge Jennifer Dorow sided with the defense Thursday and struck Counts 78-83 (six counts of homicide by vehicle, use of a controlled substance). The judge ruled there cannot be multiple punishments for the same crime.
The six charges of first-degree intentional homicide remain.
Video of Darrell Brooks Jr. allegedly driving through Waukesha Christmas parade
Brooks now faces 77 counts, down from 83 originally filed.
You read the fucking article, you worthless horse cunt. RULED is not the same as law. It's a discretionary decision. Now go back to fucking reddit and your kiddie porn, faggot.
Waukesha County Judge Jennifer Dorow sided with the defense Thursday and struck Counts 78-83 (six counts of homicide by vehicle, use of a controlled substance). The judge ruled there cannot be multiple punishments for the same crime.
The six charges of first-degree intentional homicide remain.
I dont know what's your problem. He could appeal to invalidate the whole trial if it was conducted incorrectly.
Well this is payback for.....things that never occurred to them personally being meted out on strangers that also had nothing to do with anything.
Black people are the most morally righteous and just people on the planet. Minus all the rape and murder and violent crime they commit and horrific things they do to each other, even their own children. They waz kangz on TV.
yes the fuck there can, and should, when "the same crime" is done to a crowd of people.
once can be an accident, twice is a pattern of behavior.
They literally just gave the Arbery Three multiple life sentences from two different convictions stemming from two different trials for same offense.
They also charged and convicted Chauvin with both second degree murder and manslaughter for the same offense.
That's totally different. The judge ruled that there can't be multiple punishments for the same crime, not that there can't be multiple punishments for no crime at all.
There is no justice. The only thing the law cares about now is your identity and politics.
Well, on Chauvin, they're at least concurrent sentences. Idea being if a more severe one gets overturned on appeal, the less severe one still sticks.
Doesn't mean he didn't get railroaded. Just that they weren't being overly unfair on that aspect.
Are you arguing they treated Chauvin fairly? 2nd degree murder and manslaughter are mutually exclusive. If the law was fair and blind, he couldn't have been charged and convicted of both at the same time. He also shouldn't have been charged at all, given Floyd died of an overdose.
I am not arguing he was treated fairly. I'm just describing how concurrent sentences work and why they're used.
Except in your previous comment you said:
That's not what happened to Chauvin. He was charged and convicted of both 2nd degree murder and manslaughter. Murder implies intent to kill. Manslaughter implies there is NO intent to kill. They both can't be true at the same time.
Am I misconstruing what you're trying to argue?
Yes. I'm am describing how he is serving the sentence for both convictions at the same time, not one after the other. This does not contradict the fact that the elements of manslaughter and Murder 2 are mutually exclusive; that fact just points out that juries are stupid and politically motivated.
Just whatever happened to his case since, and with the other cops for that matter?
Just for literally all the other elements of the case. I think my "favorite" is how the AG refused to accept a guilty plea to 2nd degree murder, and forced him to go through the trial. It wasn't about justice, it was about corpse-standing for political gain.
There was a second trial?
She's clearly an activist because she's ignoring the entire history of sentencing
Do you have problem with comprehension? He's accused of six intentional murders and not "homicide by vehicle, use of a controlled substance" in addition to these 6 separate murders.
As well as 71 different other charges.
We need to get rid of these judges
Google the bitch… she looks like a judge from a porno set, not a real judge.
lol you werent kidding
Disgusting.
How are the parents of the children mutilated not on fire in that city? How is there not some furious father out there to bring righteous justice on the evil dancing on their pain and tragedy?
Leftists are unbelievably sick, depraved monsters.
It's Wisconsin. The blue liberals love their black masters.
White people don't chimp out
The difference is that when blacks chimp out, their own hoods burn. When Whites chimp out, entire continents go up in flames.
Then it is about damned time we find out how flammable the world really is, ain't it?
Really makes me want to fedpost against this judge.
If this piece of shit gets off because of this commie, judeo-bitch... something needs to be done.
If he doesn't get life without parole, that judge runs a very real risk of getting murdered. Brooks took everything from multiple people who now have nothing to lose. Letting him off light would be a horrible idea.
That shit happens all the time and yet noone ever goes all Law Abiding Citizen on the judges, lawyers, and other slimy creatures.
any sentence that isn't him swinging an hour later is too lenient.
Don't worry guys. We'll just vote our way out of this
Ridiculous.
The charges were 'just-in-case' they can't convict on the first degree intentional, they can still get him for the lesser. And, yes, you can be be found guilty of multiple charges and multiple variations if the jury finds you meet the legal definition of those charges.
This was a way to clear the man of the more severe charges. The judge knows this and granted the defense's motion so that his client won't get convicted of murder. The challenge is used by defense attorneys for black criminals successfully all across blue shitholes playing to these activist judges with an extreme liberal bias.
No. There can be multiple punishments for the same crime. See Derek Chauvin.
Did he even appeal at all?
What about the other cops?
The story like totally vanished right away.
Women are entirely unsuited to be judges, as evidenced by a concocted "parallel" moral development path to skirt around the fact that women never develop a sense of justice and instead only develop compassion.
read the fucking article.
You read the fucking article, you worthless horse cunt. RULED is not the same as law. It's a discretionary decision. Now go back to fucking reddit and your kiddie porn, faggot.
Are you ok? I don't think you are.
Op is a faggot and the thread is a homosexual orgy. I hope they all get monkeypox.
It's important to note it was 6 out of 83.
I dont know what's your problem. He could appeal to invalidate the whole trial if it was conducted incorrectly.
I think the idea of hate crimes are stupid but I get the point you are making. Amazing how quickly they lost interest in this story
They never had interest. It was "I'm here live, where moments ago, an SUV just ran...oh shit, he's black, back to you in the studio, Malik!"
That honestly sounds like something classic South Park would do lol
Well this is payback for.....things that never occurred to them personally being meted out on strangers that also had nothing to do with anything.
Black people are the most morally righteous and just people on the planet. Minus all the rape and murder and violent crime they commit and horrific things they do to each other, even their own children. They waz kangz on TV.
Lol remember when they were totally going to charge those black teens who kidnapped and tortured an autistic white kid for being white?
filming your race-based kidnapping and torture is ok if you have enough melanin
That kid was a magat. Also he wasn't just autistic he was also mentally retarded
No thanks, I'm already having enough trouble breathing with my allergies.