That's totally different. The judge ruled that there can't be multiple punishments for the same crime, not that there can't be multiple punishments for no crime at all.
Are you arguing they treated Chauvin fairly? 2nd degree murder and manslaughter are mutually exclusive. If the law was fair and blind, he couldn't have been charged and convicted of both at the same time. He also shouldn't have been charged at all, given Floyd died of an overdose.
Just for literally all the other elements of the case. I think my "favorite" is how the AG refused to accept a guilty plea to 2nd degree murder, and forced him to go through the trial. It wasn't about justice, it was about corpse-standing for political gain.
Do you have problem with comprehension? He's accused of six intentional murders and not "homicide by vehicle, use of a controlled substance" in addition to these 6 separate murders.
yes the fuck there can, and should, when "the same crime" is done to a crowd of people.
once can be an accident, twice is a pattern of behavior.
They literally just gave the Arbery Three multiple life sentences from two different convictions stemming from two different trials for same offense.
They also charged and convicted Chauvin with both second degree murder and manslaughter for the same offense.
That's totally different. The judge ruled that there can't be multiple punishments for the same crime, not that there can't be multiple punishments for no crime at all.
There is no justice. The only thing the law cares about now is your identity and politics.
Well, on Chauvin, they're at least concurrent sentences. Idea being if a more severe one gets overturned on appeal, the less severe one still sticks.
Doesn't mean he didn't get railroaded. Just that they weren't being overly unfair on that aspect.
Are you arguing they treated Chauvin fairly? 2nd degree murder and manslaughter are mutually exclusive. If the law was fair and blind, he couldn't have been charged and convicted of both at the same time. He also shouldn't have been charged at all, given Floyd died of an overdose.
I am not arguing he was treated fairly. I'm just describing how concurrent sentences work and why they're used.
Just whatever happened to his case since, and with the other cops for that matter?
Just for literally all the other elements of the case. I think my "favorite" is how the AG refused to accept a guilty plea to 2nd degree murder, and forced him to go through the trial. It wasn't about justice, it was about corpse-standing for political gain.
There was a second trial?
She's clearly an activist because she's ignoring the entire history of sentencing
Do you have problem with comprehension? He's accused of six intentional murders and not "homicide by vehicle, use of a controlled substance" in addition to these 6 separate murders.
As well as 71 different other charges.