Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

51
Journalist Matthew Stadlen would like to legislate against or penalize people who have three children (imgur.com)
posted 3 years ago by AntonioOfVenice 3 years ago by AntonioOfVenice +51 / -0
50 comments share
50 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (50)
sorted by:
▲ 30 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 30 points 3 years ago +30 / -0

Stadlen was born to Sir Nicholas Stadlen, a High Court judge, and Frances Stadlen in London. He is the grandson of concert pianist Peter Stadlen and Hedi Stadlen, the activist and musicologist, both Austrian jews born in Vienna

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 32 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 32 points 3 years ago +32 / -0

The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?

Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– MassivePecorino 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit

desire to know more intensifies

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I am not going into details. Just google him and his son.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Six_z3r0 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Ray Donovan? reads Oh no...well, wait...what did I expect?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.

But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.

Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?

I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Six_z3r0 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Easy now, some of those pampered, privileged, pompous pretenders have penises, and are above reproach.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor

Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.

BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?

Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.

Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.

Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them

So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Vicenzo 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They seized money multiple times for example cyprus and Italy

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

I've already explained this to you. Sure you have to pay a higher kosher toll to own more property, but you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants. The most damaging thing you can do to globohomo is keep property out of its hands indefinitely.

Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.

You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now c) there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants.

About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around.

Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.

There is a theory about medieval Catholic theology that claims that the church intentionally tried to weaken extended families, so more people would not have someone to pass down their property to - resulting in more stuff being bequeathed to the church. Not sure I buy it, but it's definitely good for the state if people die without children.

You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now

Damn son.

Though I don't know if there are non-pozzed organizations. Every organization goes poz sooner or later. By the time you get to die, most likely the organization you willed it to will be poz.

there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.

Damn.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– SR388-SAX 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around

Not everyone that inherits property is a "trust fund kiddy." My aunt lives in her ancestral farm (3rd generation since immigrating to the US) and my extended family is anything but "trust fund kiddies."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yes, didn't mean it like that. But those that accumulate vast fortunes and pass it down to their useless offspring aren't doing their children any favor.

Unless they have Hunter Biden as a role model.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Just goes to show how fucked things are when inheriting a house means you're a trust fund kiddy lmao

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

This is literally the exact same amount of proof that you ever give for your female conspiracies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– SparkMandrill83 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

No you dont. You literally just say, "Oh look, a female in a powerful position!" or "someone in a powerful position said 'More Feminine Way'!" and call it a day

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

The Imp is unfamiliar with the notion of pandering. If his fixation were on race rather than gender, he'd be telling us all how society is structured to benefit blacks - regardless of the fact that 99% of blacks don't benefit from all that nonsense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Feminists or women? I never did figure out if you think the Gearheart agenda is specifically feminist or just something all women want.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The dolphins want us to kill ourselves and be miserable for their amusement. This proves that all things are evidence of the massive dolphin conspiracy.

Yes when you cast a net that wide, and ignore literally any basic sense contrary, anything can follow the same logic and motives.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Except I show a clear motive

What is the motive for this plot of yours to kill 90% of men?

To improve the dating market for the men who remain?

To make sure that, in your words, they cannot leech off men anymore?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The women (who control all of society btw) want us to cease to exist, but also be slaves, but also be tradcucks, but also

Yeah, the antisemitic inconsistency is much worse than yours. Totes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

Oh, yes, we should do it like big good equality China. Force women to have abortions if they exceed their baby quota and take photos with the aborted fetus next to them in bed to use to shame them.
I bet this fuckface thinks China is great.

Also, another case of "too many people in the world". No, too many useless third worlders being kept afloat by them gibz. The world is not overpopulated because a white couple has 3 kids in Oklahoma. It is "overpopulated" when African couples who have zero anything just sit around and have 15 kids who grow up and do the same because libtards like this demand we send them money.

Of course he would say those Asians and Africans don't harm LE ENVIRONMENT, but it's funny how he ignores the fact that those adorable monkeys and elephants are not killed off because of my Eastern European ass. It's Africans killing them so Chinese can buy their body parts to cure their impotence.

EDIT: He says he is "half-Jewish", but his loyalties are obvious.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– OBRIENMUSTSUFFER 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0

Why don’t you start with Africa and China, kike?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Filo76 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Indians Bollywood dance into chat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– OldBullLee 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

What an absolutely narcissistic doom-fag.

"The world is burning." People were having lots of children during much more dangerous periods of history. In fact, perilous times are the best times to have 'em, as a hedge against industrial scale death, something we're not seeing yet in 2022.

He probably can't get it up anyway. Sour grapes.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Methinks the only thing this man has a chance of conceiving is a giant turd. Perhaps a monkeypox infection.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– OldBullLee 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Right . . . SORE grapes (Haw Haw!)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– realerfunction 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

if you're so fucking worried about the planet, kill yourself. you will be doing the planet a service.

oh, are you too important to be the change you want others to be?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Except illegal aliens illegal immigrants poor migrants dreamers refugees, of course.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Archives for this post:

link - archive.org - archive.today

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FrozeInFear 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

What a racist!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

Yes? The point of penalizing is to discourage harmful behaviors and encourage good ones.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Exactly, and nothing is more harmful than continuing to enable women's ego.

TIL a next generation "enables women's ego".

They're far more fragile and insecure than even you are, dummy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Adamrises 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

He has never answered the question of how we continue to have a future if every single ability to have children is either women's ploy, tradcon cuckery, or both.

Which, among many things, is proof that he has no solutions. He just wants to be mad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Six_z3r0 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

When have they not been hit from the left? At this point, those strikes should be slapping against a hard callous.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy