The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?
Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)
A real two-year old's understanding of finance and markets shown here.
manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands"
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Aside from that, the last market crashes were not caused by manipulation, they were caused by an error in how risk was calculated in their systems. In 2008, debt books based on mortgage repayments were regarded as low risk because their trade value didn't fluctuate. This meant that every institution was heavily exposed to them because "zero risk" and decent reward. When those mortgages started defaulting because they were actually a high risk default despite what the systems said, those institutions largely collapsed. Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them, but instead was bailed out with the Big 3 automakers and other mismanaged businesses that were destroyed in the resulting collapse.
2000's market crash was caused by overspeculation on assets based off future value, think if the whole market was made up of hype stock like GME, RIVN and PLTR. This was largely the work of retail traders enamoured with the possibilities the Internet brought.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor. Always assume malice, even if incompetence is likely.
Bankers don't make money when everything collapses, look how many missed earnings in Q1 + Q2 2022. I watch a lot of bank stocks and I think the only one that beat on EPS and revenues was Citigroup, which I didn't own, but also says that the only person doing well from everyone doing awfully happens to be a feminist.
Edit : I checked, the only other bank stock to beat on both was Standard Chartered, a UK based bank that operates mainly in Asia, which was sheltered from the Ukrainian war by the fact that those countries don't care about Ukraine.
Considering we already had one plague from a woman's laboratory in the last few years...
Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?
I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor
Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.
BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.
Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.
Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them
So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.
The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?
Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)
desire to know more intensifies
I am not going into details. Just google him and his son.
Ray Donovan? reads Oh no...well, wait...what did I expect?
A real two-year old's understanding of finance and markets shown here.
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Aside from that, the last market crashes were not caused by manipulation, they were caused by an error in how risk was calculated in their systems. In 2008, debt books based on mortgage repayments were regarded as low risk because their trade value didn't fluctuate. This meant that every institution was heavily exposed to them because "zero risk" and decent reward. When those mortgages started defaulting because they were actually a high risk default despite what the systems said, those institutions largely collapsed. Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them, but instead was bailed out with the Big 3 automakers and other mismanaged businesses that were destroyed in the resulting collapse.
2000's market crash was caused by overspeculation on assets based off future value, think if the whole market was made up of hype stock like GME, RIVN and PLTR. This was largely the work of retail traders enamoured with the possibilities the Internet brought.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor. Always assume malice, even if incompetence is likely.
Bankers don't make money when everything collapses, look how many missed earnings in Q1 + Q2 2022. I watch a lot of bank stocks and I think the only one that beat on EPS and revenues was Citigroup, which I didn't own, but also says that the only person doing well from everyone doing awfully happens to be a feminist.
Edit : I checked, the only other bank stock to beat on both was Standard Chartered, a UK based bank that operates mainly in Asia, which was sheltered from the Ukrainian war by the fact that those countries don't care about Ukraine.
Considering we already had one plague from a woman's laboratory in the last few years...
Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?
I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.
Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.
BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.
Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.
Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.
So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.
They seized money multiple times for example cyprus and Italy