Stadlen was born to Sir Nicholas Stadlen, a High Court judge, and Frances Stadlen in London. He is the grandson of concert pianist Peter Stadlen and Hedi Stadlen, the activist and musicologist, both Austrian jews born in Vienna
The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?
Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)
A real two-year old's understanding of finance and markets shown here.
manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands"
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Aside from that, the last market crashes were not caused by manipulation, they were caused by an error in how risk was calculated in their systems. In 2008, debt books based on mortgage repayments were regarded as low risk because their trade value didn't fluctuate. This meant that every institution was heavily exposed to them because "zero risk" and decent reward. When those mortgages started defaulting because they were actually a high risk default despite what the systems said, those institutions largely collapsed. Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them, but instead was bailed out with the Big 3 automakers and other mismanaged businesses that were destroyed in the resulting collapse.
2000's market crash was caused by overspeculation on assets based off future value, think if the whole market was made up of hype stock like GME, RIVN and PLTR. This was largely the work of retail traders enamoured with the possibilities the Internet brought.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.
Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.
Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them
So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.
I've already explained this to you. Sure you have to pay a higher kosher toll to own more property, but you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants. The most damaging thing you can do to globohomo is keep property out of its hands indefinitely.
Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.
You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now c) there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.
you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants.
About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around.
Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.
There is a theory about medieval Catholic theology that claims that the church intentionally tried to weaken extended families, so more people would not have someone to pass down their property to - resulting in more stuff being bequeathed to the church. Not sure I buy it, but it's definitely good for the state if people die without children.
You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now
Damn son.
Though I don't know if there are non-pozzed organizations. Every organization goes poz sooner or later. By the time you get to die, most likely the organization you willed it to will be poz.
there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.
About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around
Not everyone that inherits property is a "trust fund kiddy." My aunt lives in her ancestral farm (3rd generation since immigrating to the US) and my extended family is anything but "trust fund kiddies."
No you dont. You literally just say, "Oh look, a female in a powerful position!" or "someone in a powerful position said 'More Feminine Way'!" and call it a day
The dolphins want us to kill ourselves and be miserable for their amusement. This proves that all things are evidence of the massive dolphin conspiracy.
Yes when you cast a net that wide, and ignore literally any basic sense contrary, anything can follow the same logic and motives.
Zero fucking consistency.
The people who own banks want us to just keep more money with them they can control, "whoopsies, just lost", manipulate the investments and stock markets to "whoops, just became valueless Monopoly money, let us take it off your hands", etc.
You yourself complained about some bank being "more feminine way" because some woman became some high position there and how you can not trust them with your money.
But the others are genuinely nice people who just want to help you, right?
Then again, you excuse men, especially Jewish men even when they publicly, obviously do fucked up shit, even on an individual basis.
Like pedophiles and such.
(I would love to hear your hot take on Liev Schreiber, that fucking disgusting piece of Satanic shit.)
desire to know more intensifies
I am not going into details. Just google him and his son.
A real two-year old's understanding of finance and markets shown here.
This has never happened - no bank has ever seized investments during a market crash. Are you mixing it up with how FDR seized gold?
Aside from that, the last market crashes were not caused by manipulation, they were caused by an error in how risk was calculated in their systems. In 2008, debt books based on mortgage repayments were regarded as low risk because their trade value didn't fluctuate. This meant that every institution was heavily exposed to them because "zero risk" and decent reward. When those mortgages started defaulting because they were actually a high risk default despite what the systems said, those institutions largely collapsed. Lehman Brothers were the largest casualty and Citigroup arguably should have joined them, but instead was bailed out with the Big 3 automakers and other mismanaged businesses that were destroyed in the resulting collapse.
2000's market crash was caused by overspeculation on assets based off future value, think if the whole market was made up of hype stock like GME, RIVN and PLTR. This was largely the work of retail traders enamoured with the possibilities the Internet brought.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
Theoretically, companies can make your stocks worthless by just emitting a trillion new stocks.
Not saying it's likely. But a lot of stuff that I thought was unlikely came to pass with such rapidity, that I don't know anymore.
So typical of the Matriarchy to collapse a company called Lehman BROTHERS, thereby reinforcing the notion that men are bad at their job and that they should bring in more oppressors from the Nazi gender in order to fix things up.
They seized money multiple times for example cyprus and Italy
I've already explained this to you. Sure you have to pay a higher kosher toll to own more property, but you get property in the end which can then be passed on to your descendants. The most damaging thing you can do to globohomo is keep property out of its hands indefinitely.
Genetic dead ends like you however, will have all their assets dispersed to the system when you die. It won't stay in your family.
You could avoid this if you had a will and had some reliably non-pozzed organization to leave it but a) you've already said you don't have a will b) you are too mentally ill to do this now c) there is basically zero awareness of this in MGTOW circles because, as liberals, you have the trademark liberal main character syndrome and cannot comprehend the trite brevity of a single person's life.
About that. It sound very good. But I notice that trust fund kiddies tend to be the most repellent creatures around.
There is a theory about medieval Catholic theology that claims that the church intentionally tried to weaken extended families, so more people would not have someone to pass down their property to - resulting in more stuff being bequeathed to the church. Not sure I buy it, but it's definitely good for the state if people die without children.
Damn son.
Though I don't know if there are non-pozzed organizations. Every organization goes poz sooner or later. By the time you get to die, most likely the organization you willed it to will be poz.
Damn.
Not everyone that inherits property is a "trust fund kiddy." My aunt lives in her ancestral farm (3rd generation since immigrating to the US) and my extended family is anything but "trust fund kiddies."
This is literally the exact same amount of proof that you ever give for your female conspiracies.
Except I show a clear motive and they all follow the same logic, that feminists want to reduce the male population and will do anything to achieve it.
No you dont. You literally just say, "Oh look, a female in a powerful position!" or "someone in a powerful position said 'More Feminine Way'!" and call it a day
Feminists or women? I never did figure out if you think the Gearheart agenda is specifically feminist or just something all women want.
Yes when you cast a net that wide, and ignore literally any basic sense contrary, anything can follow the same logic and motives.
What is the motive for this plot of yours to kill 90% of men?
To improve the dating market for the men who remain?
To make sure that, in your words, they cannot leech off men anymore?
Yeah, the antisemitic inconsistency is much worse than yours. Totes.