Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor. Always assume malice, even if incompetence is likely.
Bankers don't make money when everything collapses, look how many missed earnings in Q1 + Q2 2022. I watch a lot of bank stocks and I think the only one that beat on EPS and revenues was Citigroup, which I didn't own, but also says that the only person doing well from everyone doing awfully happens to be a feminist.
Edit : I checked, the only other bank stock to beat on both was Standard Chartered, a UK based bank that operates mainly in Asia, which was sheltered from the Ukrainian war by the fact that those countries don't care about Ukraine.
Considering we already had one plague from a woman's laboratory in the last few years...
Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?
I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor
Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.
BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.
Interesting how you assume like superhuman calculation and intentional, foaming at mouth malice when you talk about women, coupled with coordination that is basically borg-level.
But you just give the benefit of "oh, honest mistake" to people with a vested interest in the financial world going their way AND the power to make it so.
Interesting how selective you are with what's plausible and what isn't.
You also say I have an infant's intellect when it comes to finance, but you pretend you know everything when it comes to accusing women. Like when you claimed it's more likely women specially made monekypox to kill men only, than a couple gay men on an individual basis molesting kids and infecting them.
You claim the craziest, most ridiculous theories are true, and you know it for a fact, but everyone else is an idiot.
I only assume the malice, actually. I made a joke about it, calling it Impossible's Razor. Always assume malice, even if incompetence is likely.
Bankers don't make money when everything collapses, look how many missed earnings in Q1 + Q2 2022. I watch a lot of bank stocks and I think the only one that beat on EPS and revenues was Citigroup, which I didn't own, but also says that the only person doing well from everyone doing awfully happens to be a feminist.
Edit : I checked, the only other bank stock to beat on both was Standard Chartered, a UK based bank that operates mainly in Asia, which was sheltered from the Ukrainian war by the fact that those countries don't care about Ukraine.
Considering we already had one plague from a woman's laboratory in the last few years...
Then again, if the financial world collapses... in theory... who can outlast that and profit once it comes back?
The billionaires who already have billions, land, assets of every kind, who can live off of that for all their lives.
Or us, normal people?
I know you overestimate your own wealth and societal value a lot here, but you would not even be in the same ballpark as those big banker dynasties.
They lose money. Hell yes, they do. But their never lose it all. I only have this one place where I live. My one moderate car. IF I lose that, I lost what I owned.
The bankers can afford to lose BILLIONS and still stay at the top, just outlast the issues and you even buy the lie that it's an issue for them that they have to fake losses for a few years while we all get fucked over. HAH.
And you laughed with us when the celebs moaned about being locked in their mega mansions during COVID, talking about how they are doing their part and making such sacrifices. This is the same, but bigger.
Easy now, some of those pampered, privileged, pompous pretenders have penises, and are above reproach.
Ockham's razor was adopted because it worked. Impossible's razor only leads to retarded results. So why keep it? FTMs do have an obsession with razors and shaving, they think it makes them a man.
BTW, before you complain: I agree with you that it's not "DA JOOOZ". But I don't believe in blaming it on your substitute Jews, the womans, either.