Once again the difference between gays and fags on display. Out of all the gay people I’ve known none were predatory (aside from military lesbians). Even then I have come across fags, people so self absorbed in their own sex fetish they forget that reality exists. The problem is that fags have always been in control politically and showed the polite gays until it was convenient to go full sodom and gomorrah.
The first time I noticed that something was deeply wrong with the homosexual "rights" movement, was when I saw them cry about laws criminalizing intentional spreading of AIDS. This was way before the California thing that brought it to mainstream attention. Their arguments were really piss-poor, like "it's everyone's responsibility to use 'protection'". Yes, but that does not remove from an diseased lowlife the responsibility to not spread it intentionally.
The only ones who agreed with me were the lesbians. I assume they were not as sex-addicted to completely lose their minds.
But I dismissed this as a fluke. It took years for me to recognize the saddest words in the English language: the religious right was right again.
I was told, and I don't know if it's true, that this was mostly about the "knowingly" part of that crime. People weren't getting tested so they couldn't "knowingly" pass it and the penalties were so high.
The problem with this statement is what does Gay even mean? I knew a guy who got fucked up on drugs and stuck his dick in any hole he could find, male, female, or miscellaneous. He was 'gay' by his own statement. Meanwhile I know another dude who called himself 'bi' but was a fugly little troll that women couldn't run away from fast enough. Are incels 'gay'? I think he was just lonely.
I've said this at length but the modern conception of homosexuality makes no sense and bears little resemblance to readily observable evidence.
it is fake (and gay) - and caused by molestation in most cases, gays reproduce by fucking kids
dicks in pussies is instinctual, all of the other deviant behaviors are learned and imprinted by the brain because of the supremacy of that reward system, at usually too young of an age - that is one reason porn needs to be made illegal to greatly decrease the likelihood of kids stumbling on it
Sexual stimulation for pleasure is a hobby and a hobby that consumes an unhealthy portion of a person's life (time, energy, attention, resources) is just another addiction.
Activist fags who teach elementary school are obviously trying to groom children, if not for immediate sex, then for accepting sexual perversion as normal. I think the more general threat is worse than the occasional child rape. At least a rape victim has the chance to recover, but recovery is impossible if you're told by every adult authority ruling your young life to roll over and take it up the ass to be inclusive and not be a bigot homophobe.
Only a few years ago I wouldn't have imagined making such a claim but it's obvious. They're not hiding anymore, they're crowing about it.
I'd say that's a discussion about sexual behavior as a whole. Is straight good when it basically just means fucking and using whores and never having healthy relationships?
There never needs to be a "discussion about sexual behavior". Particularly in a public setting. The destruction of the partition between public and private spheres is quite possibly the prime cause of civilizational decay.
Is straight good
There is a no "straight", there is only normal. Which is the opposite of degenerate. The idea of calling normal "straight" is part of the cultural subversion.
just means fucking and using whores
Fornication used to be and still should be stigmatized. Sodomy used to be and still should be criminalized. Obscenity needs to be enforced regardless of how "arbitrary" it is and how many sympathetic "harmless perverts" are scooped up.
The difference between the sane LGBs and the gender ideology pedophiles is also on display. The former have a serious fag problem as you note, but it's the troons are who are mutilating children. The LGBs aren't inherently evil. The TQ+ crowd is.
That's actually my biggest complaint about the LGBs. Their "movement" is fully on board with helping the gender perverts push us off this cliff. That's why I said the sane ones. The ones running the shit show certainly aren't sane.
At this point I will not be surprised if any day now they advocate for P acceptance into their movement. It's gonna happen openly and probably is already secretly. I have zero issues with those that actively call out the sex pests, sadly it isn't a lot who do.
Dumb cunt should have realized that not being burned as a witch was enough "equality" and left it alone
The moment the "thinking sex" paper came out full on supporting pedos and "regular" gays and lesbos didnt put gayle reuben's head on a pike (metaphorically) they became complicit
The degenerates who call the shots in the alphabet movement have always had an on again off again relationship with the pedophiles (of which the troons are just a subset). To normalize homosexuality they put the sane LGBs out front and hid the rest in the dark hole they originated from. Now that they've succeeded they're pushing troonery hard because they're the easiest group of pedophiles to shield from accountability with the "oppressed minority" shtick. Once that's normalized they can normalize the rest of the pedophiles. For now kiddy diddlers will have to be content with transing themselves if they want to get away with child molestation.
I'm going to be an asshole for a second. She is clearly old enough that she WAS around when nambla was associated with the LGBT movement. That shit wasn't severed until the 90s.
There has always been a group that has tried to associate pedophilia and the LGBT movement. Always. Anyone saying otherwise is ignorant of history.
That said, what mattered back then was that the severing of ties happened (for the most part. There were still some associations, but relative to how it was prior it was relatively minor (though obviously still should have been severed)). I cannot say that I see that happening in the modern day. I don't think the LGBT "community" has the spine, nor the moral compass, to stand against pedophilia.
So this lesbian might be saying something good now, but she's old enough that there were still plenty of ties to pedos back in the day. This isn't a new development.
About the nicest thing that can be said about her is, she probably thought the LGB's were winning against the P's. (Child-targeting T's were as yet unknown back in the '70s.)
But she probably supported pro-gay content in schools, so yeah, she should feel remorse.
I'll accept responding to Clarence Thomas writing the majority opinion on a case overturning nationwide gay marriage with a solemn 'we deserved this' and combating the many fellow queers who will inevitably disagree as a bare minimum. Alongside the Dobbs decision, it will represent the first concrete step on the long, long road to once more re-stigmatizing deviant sexual behaviors and promoting healthy norms that actually positively contribute to a civilization's survival.
So that's the excuse? You didn't know? You were 100% warned that it would happen, and it's happening. You didn't listen to them because you couldn't think beyond your own selfish desires.
The really sad part is that she will never pay for her transgressions. Just like the boomers voted for every candidate that promised any god damn social program and welfare handouts because "lol why not". They get to die comfortable in their sleep while the rest of us wonder if we'll even have beds to lay in after 10 years.
It all started with the legalization of Gay marriage. The institution of marriage is sacred and it is always between a man and a woman. Always. Now, I am not saying that gays should be in prison or persecuted, that gay sex should be ilegal, that two man or two woman can't share a house... No, the question is about Civilization and the preservation of a fixed point of moral and values.
It's always been regret. That's why the end game is the Fortress of Regrets, and the final dialog stuff is all about regrets and how it changed him.
There's a point when you're asked the question and you can answer, and belief has a strong evidence backing it based on the shit you talk to the final boss about how belief can move planes.
But thematically it's regret. The question was not designed for all of mankind. It wasn't a rhetorical question, but one with real consequences specifically about how to go about actually changing the fundamental nature of one man in particular, and in the context of the story that one man had his answer.
We told you, and when we did you spat in our faces. Now it personally affects you because other, even more degenerate fetishes have taken over the limelight - and suddenly it's a big problem?
People hate on "the npcs" but for one, we are all someone's npc, someone out there thinks of your beliefs specifically as that of some ineffectual majority horde. And the other thing is, the traits we associate with npc are the traits that lead people to support authority in any case, these are just "the people" and everyone has been sneering about them like Cersei fuckin Lannister since the beginning of civilization. Yknow who didn't smirk, was Jesus and all those "npcs" count time from the year he was born to this day, so
My point is we get caught up in d&c too easy, I guess. This lady has been a lesbian for God knows how long, imagine all the shit she would have talked online if it existed all that while, as something develops which nobody wants. One day it just IS and we're so entrenched in the d&c rituals we just react like "STUPID FEMINIST BOOMERS" lol
Once again the difference between gays and fags on display. Out of all the gay people I’ve known none were predatory (aside from military lesbians). Even then I have come across fags, people so self absorbed in their own sex fetish they forget that reality exists. The problem is that fags have always been in control politically and showed the polite gays until it was convenient to go full sodom and gomorrah.
The first time I noticed that something was deeply wrong with the homosexual "rights" movement, was when I saw them cry about laws criminalizing intentional spreading of AIDS. This was way before the California thing that brought it to mainstream attention. Their arguments were really piss-poor, like "it's everyone's responsibility to use 'protection'". Yes, but that does not remove from an diseased lowlife the responsibility to not spread it intentionally.
The only ones who agreed with me were the lesbians. I assume they were not as sex-addicted to completely lose their minds.
But I dismissed this as a fluke. It took years for me to recognize the saddest words in the English language: the religious right was right again.
I was told, and I don't know if it's true, that this was mostly about the "knowingly" part of that crime. People weren't getting tested so they couldn't "knowingly" pass it and the penalties were so high.
Well, if they slut around without getting tested, they deserve the firing squad, anyway.
First time for me was when I read about bugchasers
The problem with this statement is what does Gay even mean? I knew a guy who got fucked up on drugs and stuck his dick in any hole he could find, male, female, or miscellaneous. He was 'gay' by his own statement. Meanwhile I know another dude who called himself 'bi' but was a fugly little troll that women couldn't run away from fast enough. Are incels 'gay'? I think he was just lonely.
I've said this at length but the modern conception of homosexuality makes no sense and bears little resemblance to readily observable evidence.
it is fake (and gay) - and caused by molestation in most cases, gays reproduce by fucking kids
dicks in pussies is instinctual, all of the other deviant behaviors are learned and imprinted by the brain because of the supremacy of that reward system, at usually too young of an age - that is one reason porn needs to be made illegal to greatly decrease the likelihood of kids stumbling on it
Sexual stimulation for pleasure is a hobby and a hobby that consumes an unhealthy portion of a person's life (time, energy, attention, resources) is just another addiction.
100%.
Activist fags who teach elementary school are obviously trying to groom children, if not for immediate sex, then for accepting sexual perversion as normal. I think the more general threat is worse than the occasional child rape. At least a rape victim has the chance to recover, but recovery is impossible if you're told by every adult authority ruling your young life to roll over and take it up the ass to be inclusive and not be a bigot homophobe.
Only a few years ago I wouldn't have imagined making such a claim but it's obvious. They're not hiding anymore, they're crowing about it.
I'd say that's a discussion about sexual behavior as a whole. Is straight good when it basically just means fucking and using whores and never having healthy relationships?
There never needs to be a "discussion about sexual behavior". Particularly in a public setting. The destruction of the partition between public and private spheres is quite possibly the prime cause of civilizational decay.
There is a no "straight", there is only normal. Which is the opposite of degenerate. The idea of calling normal "straight" is part of the cultural subversion.
Fornication used to be and still should be stigmatized. Sodomy used to be and still should be criminalized. Obscenity needs to be enforced regardless of how "arbitrary" it is and how many sympathetic "harmless perverts" are scooped up.
Well that's exactly what I mean. We can't just look at straight being normal when it involves abnormal sexual deviancy
is your reasoning "normal people sometimes do shit they shouldn't therefore faggotry is fine?"
No I am condemning the overall state of sexual degeneracy both homosexual and heterosexual deviancy.
sodomy IS degeneracy, there is no such thing as non-deviant homosexuality
by accepting the premise that there can be "good" faggotry you are doing your small part in undermining civilization
The difference between the sane LGBs and the gender ideology pedophiles is also on display. The former have a serious fag problem as you note, but it's the troons are who are mutilating children. The LGBs aren't inherently evil. The TQ+ crowd is.
See that would be a reasinable stance if the L, G, and Bs weren't 100% complicit with the Ts actions.
That's actually my biggest complaint about the LGBs. Their "movement" is fully on board with helping the gender perverts push us off this cliff. That's why I said the sane ones. The ones running the shit show certainly aren't sane.
At this point I will not be surprised if any day now they advocate for P acceptance into their movement. It's gonna happen openly and probably is already secretly. I have zero issues with those that actively call out the sex pests, sadly it isn't a lot who do.
There are no sane queers.
I believe the word is "queers", not "fags" which is a slur against any homo.
Gay is the sexual preference for your own sex, queer is being different for it's own sake and then shaming others for not being as different as you.
I believe I don’t care what pedophile enablers call themselves
Dumb cunt should have realized that not being burned as a witch was enough "equality" and left it alone
The moment the "thinking sex" paper came out full on supporting pedos and "regular" gays and lesbos didnt put gayle reuben's head on a pike (metaphorically) they became complicit
The degenerates who call the shots in the alphabet movement have always had an on again off again relationship with the pedophiles (of which the troons are just a subset). To normalize homosexuality they put the sane LGBs out front and hid the rest in the dark hole they originated from. Now that they've succeeded they're pushing troonery hard because they're the easiest group of pedophiles to shield from accountability with the "oppressed minority" shtick. Once that's normalized they can normalize the rest of the pedophiles. For now kiddy diddlers will have to be content with transing themselves if they want to get away with child molestation.
no, literally.
I'm going to be an asshole for a second. She is clearly old enough that she WAS around when nambla was associated with the LGBT movement. That shit wasn't severed until the 90s.
There has always been a group that has tried to associate pedophilia and the LGBT movement. Always. Anyone saying otherwise is ignorant of history.
That said, what mattered back then was that the severing of ties happened (for the most part. There were still some associations, but relative to how it was prior it was relatively minor (though obviously still should have been severed)). I cannot say that I see that happening in the modern day. I don't think the LGBT "community" has the spine, nor the moral compass, to stand against pedophilia.
So this lesbian might be saying something good now, but she's old enough that there were still plenty of ties to pedos back in the day. This isn't a new development.
About the nicest thing that can be said about her is, she probably thought the LGB's were winning against the P's. (Child-targeting T's were as yet unknown back in the '70s.)
But she probably supported pro-gay content in schools, so yeah, she should feel remorse.
Ah yes the they pretended to not be pedophiles anymore so it's all good defense
Taking the words right out of my mouth.
Talk is cheap, actions are expensive. What is this old, dried up cunt doing to rectify her mistake?
Bitching on TikTok for attention it seems.
I'll accept responding to Clarence Thomas writing the majority opinion on a case overturning nationwide gay marriage with a solemn 'we deserved this' and combating the many fellow queers who will inevitably disagree as a bare minimum. Alongside the Dobbs decision, it will represent the first concrete step on the long, long road to once more re-stigmatizing deviant sexual behaviors and promoting healthy norms that actually positively contribute to a civilization's survival.
So that's the excuse? You didn't know? You were 100% warned that it would happen, and it's happening. You didn't listen to them because you couldn't think beyond your own selfish desires.
The really sad part is that she will never pay for her transgressions. Just like the boomers voted for every candidate that promised any god damn social program and welfare handouts because "lol why not". They get to die comfortable in their sleep while the rest of us wonder if we'll even have beds to lay in after 10 years.
Remorse is good. Let's see repentance now.
It all started with the legalization of Gay marriage. The institution of marriage is sacred and it is always between a man and a woman. Always. Now, I am not saying that gays should be in prison or persecuted, that gay sex should be ilegal, that two man or two woman can't share a house... No, the question is about Civilization and the preservation of a fixed point of moral and values.
liberal
I thought it was belief? Damn it I need to install Planescape: Torment again.
It's always been regret. That's why the end game is the Fortress of Regrets, and the final dialog stuff is all about regrets and how it changed him.
There's a point when you're asked the question and you can answer, and belief has a strong evidence backing it based on the shit you talk to the final boss about how belief can move planes.
But thematically it's regret. The question was not designed for all of mankind. It wasn't a rhetorical question, but one with real consequences specifically about how to go about actually changing the fundamental nature of one man in particular, and in the context of the story that one man had his answer.
Regret is correct. Or does it change based on playthrough? I've only played it once.
We told you, and when we did you spat in our faces. Now it personally affects you because other, even more degenerate fetishes have taken over the limelight - and suddenly it's a big problem?
Get fucked, cunt.
People hate on "the npcs" but for one, we are all someone's npc, someone out there thinks of your beliefs specifically as that of some ineffectual majority horde. And the other thing is, the traits we associate with npc are the traits that lead people to support authority in any case, these are just "the people" and everyone has been sneering about them like Cersei fuckin Lannister since the beginning of civilization. Yknow who didn't smirk, was Jesus and all those "npcs" count time from the year he was born to this day, so
My point is we get caught up in d&c too easy, I guess. This lady has been a lesbian for God knows how long, imagine all the shit she would have talked online if it existed all that while, as something develops which nobody wants. One day it just IS and we're so entrenched in the d&c rituals we just react like "STUPID FEMINIST BOOMERS" lol
Can't tell whether you're ironically agreeing with the last dozen words of my comment or not.
Gag lol