The first time I noticed that something was deeply wrong with the homosexual "rights" movement, was when I saw them cry about laws criminalizing intentional spreading of AIDS. This was way before the California thing that brought it to mainstream attention. Their arguments were really piss-poor, like "it's everyone's responsibility to use 'protection'". Yes, but that does not remove from an diseased lowlife the responsibility to not spread it intentionally.
The only ones who agreed with me were the lesbians. I assume they were not as sex-addicted to completely lose their minds.
But I dismissed this as a fluke. It took years for me to recognize the saddest words in the English language: the religious right was right again.
I was told, and I don't know if it's true, that this was mostly about the "knowingly" part of that crime. People weren't getting tested so they couldn't "knowingly" pass it and the penalties were so high.
The first time I noticed that something was deeply wrong with the homosexual "rights" movement, was when I saw them cry about laws criminalizing intentional spreading of AIDS. This was way before the California thing that brought it to mainstream attention. Their arguments were really piss-poor, like "it's everyone's responsibility to use 'protection'". Yes, but that does not remove from an diseased lowlife the responsibility to not spread it intentionally.
The only ones who agreed with me were the lesbians. I assume they were not as sex-addicted to completely lose their minds.
But I dismissed this as a fluke. It took years for me to recognize the saddest words in the English language: the religious right was right again.
I was told, and I don't know if it's true, that this was mostly about the "knowingly" part of that crime. People weren't getting tested so they couldn't "knowingly" pass it and the penalties were so high.
Well, if they slut around without getting tested, they deserve the firing squad, anyway.
First time for me was when I read about bugchasers