Once again the difference between gays and fags on display. Out of all the gay people I’ve known none were predatory (aside from military lesbians). Even then I have come across fags, people so self absorbed in their own sex fetish they forget that reality exists. The problem is that fags have always been in control politically and showed the polite gays until it was convenient to go full sodom and gomorrah.
The first time I noticed that something was deeply wrong with the homosexual "rights" movement, was when I saw them cry about laws criminalizing intentional spreading of AIDS. This was way before the California thing that brought it to mainstream attention. Their arguments were really piss-poor, like "it's everyone's responsibility to use 'protection'". Yes, but that does not remove from an diseased lowlife the responsibility to not spread it intentionally.
The only ones who agreed with me were the lesbians. I assume they were not as sex-addicted to completely lose their minds.
But I dismissed this as a fluke. It took years for me to recognize the saddest words in the English language: the religious right was right again.
I was told, and I don't know if it's true, that this was mostly about the "knowingly" part of that crime. People weren't getting tested so they couldn't "knowingly" pass it and the penalties were so high.
The problem with this statement is what does Gay even mean? I knew a guy who got fucked up on drugs and stuck his dick in any hole he could find, male, female, or miscellaneous. He was 'gay' by his own statement. Meanwhile I know another dude who called himself 'bi' but was a fugly little troll that women couldn't run away from fast enough. Are incels 'gay'? I think he was just lonely.
I've said this at length but the modern conception of homosexuality makes no sense and bears little resemblance to readily observable evidence.
it is fake (and gay) - and caused by molestation in most cases, gays reproduce by fucking kids
dicks in pussies is instinctual, all of the other deviant behaviors are learned and imprinted by the brain because of the supremacy of that reward system, at usually too young of an age - that is one reason porn needs to be made illegal to greatly decrease the likelihood of kids stumbling on it
Sexual stimulation for pleasure is a hobby and a hobby that consumes an unhealthy portion of a person's life (time, energy, attention, resources) is just another addiction.
Activist fags who teach elementary school are obviously trying to groom children, if not for immediate sex, then for accepting sexual perversion as normal. I think the more general threat is worse than the occasional child rape. At least a rape victim has the chance to recover, but recovery is impossible if you're told by every adult authority ruling your young life to roll over and take it up the ass to be inclusive and not be a bigot homophobe.
Only a few years ago I wouldn't have imagined making such a claim but it's obvious. They're not hiding anymore, they're crowing about it.
I'd say that's a discussion about sexual behavior as a whole. Is straight good when it basically just means fucking and using whores and never having healthy relationships?
There never needs to be a "discussion about sexual behavior". Particularly in a public setting. The destruction of the partition between public and private spheres is quite possibly the prime cause of civilizational decay.
Is straight good
There is a no "straight", there is only normal. Which is the opposite of degenerate. The idea of calling normal "straight" is part of the cultural subversion.
just means fucking and using whores
Fornication used to be and still should be stigmatized. Sodomy used to be and still should be criminalized. Obscenity needs to be enforced regardless of how "arbitrary" it is and how many sympathetic "harmless perverts" are scooped up.
The difference between the sane LGBs and the gender ideology pedophiles is also on display. The former have a serious fag problem as you note, but it's the troons are who are mutilating children. The LGBs aren't inherently evil. The TQ+ crowd is.
That's actually my biggest complaint about the LGBs. Their "movement" is fully on board with helping the gender perverts push us off this cliff. That's why I said the sane ones. The ones running the shit show certainly aren't sane.
At this point I will not be surprised if any day now they advocate for P acceptance into their movement. It's gonna happen openly and probably is already secretly. I have zero issues with those that actively call out the sex pests, sadly it isn't a lot who do.
Once again the difference between gays and fags on display. Out of all the gay people I’ve known none were predatory (aside from military lesbians). Even then I have come across fags, people so self absorbed in their own sex fetish they forget that reality exists. The problem is that fags have always been in control politically and showed the polite gays until it was convenient to go full sodom and gomorrah.
The first time I noticed that something was deeply wrong with the homosexual "rights" movement, was when I saw them cry about laws criminalizing intentional spreading of AIDS. This was way before the California thing that brought it to mainstream attention. Their arguments were really piss-poor, like "it's everyone's responsibility to use 'protection'". Yes, but that does not remove from an diseased lowlife the responsibility to not spread it intentionally.
The only ones who agreed with me were the lesbians. I assume they were not as sex-addicted to completely lose their minds.
But I dismissed this as a fluke. It took years for me to recognize the saddest words in the English language: the religious right was right again.
I was told, and I don't know if it's true, that this was mostly about the "knowingly" part of that crime. People weren't getting tested so they couldn't "knowingly" pass it and the penalties were so high.
Well, if they slut around without getting tested, they deserve the firing squad, anyway.
First time for me was when I read about bugchasers
The problem with this statement is what does Gay even mean? I knew a guy who got fucked up on drugs and stuck his dick in any hole he could find, male, female, or miscellaneous. He was 'gay' by his own statement. Meanwhile I know another dude who called himself 'bi' but was a fugly little troll that women couldn't run away from fast enough. Are incels 'gay'? I think he was just lonely.
I've said this at length but the modern conception of homosexuality makes no sense and bears little resemblance to readily observable evidence.
it is fake (and gay) - and caused by molestation in most cases, gays reproduce by fucking kids
dicks in pussies is instinctual, all of the other deviant behaviors are learned and imprinted by the brain because of the supremacy of that reward system, at usually too young of an age - that is one reason porn needs to be made illegal to greatly decrease the likelihood of kids stumbling on it
Sexual stimulation for pleasure is a hobby and a hobby that consumes an unhealthy portion of a person's life (time, energy, attention, resources) is just another addiction.
100%.
Activist fags who teach elementary school are obviously trying to groom children, if not for immediate sex, then for accepting sexual perversion as normal. I think the more general threat is worse than the occasional child rape. At least a rape victim has the chance to recover, but recovery is impossible if you're told by every adult authority ruling your young life to roll over and take it up the ass to be inclusive and not be a bigot homophobe.
Only a few years ago I wouldn't have imagined making such a claim but it's obvious. They're not hiding anymore, they're crowing about it.
I'd say that's a discussion about sexual behavior as a whole. Is straight good when it basically just means fucking and using whores and never having healthy relationships?
There never needs to be a "discussion about sexual behavior". Particularly in a public setting. The destruction of the partition between public and private spheres is quite possibly the prime cause of civilizational decay.
There is a no "straight", there is only normal. Which is the opposite of degenerate. The idea of calling normal "straight" is part of the cultural subversion.
Fornication used to be and still should be stigmatized. Sodomy used to be and still should be criminalized. Obscenity needs to be enforced regardless of how "arbitrary" it is and how many sympathetic "harmless perverts" are scooped up.
Well that's exactly what I mean. We can't just look at straight being normal when it involves abnormal sexual deviancy
The difference between the sane LGBs and the gender ideology pedophiles is also on display. The former have a serious fag problem as you note, but it's the troons are who are mutilating children. The LGBs aren't inherently evil. The TQ+ crowd is.
See that would be a reasinable stance if the L, G, and Bs weren't 100% complicit with the Ts actions.
That's actually my biggest complaint about the LGBs. Their "movement" is fully on board with helping the gender perverts push us off this cliff. That's why I said the sane ones. The ones running the shit show certainly aren't sane.
At this point I will not be surprised if any day now they advocate for P acceptance into their movement. It's gonna happen openly and probably is already secretly. I have zero issues with those that actively call out the sex pests, sadly it isn't a lot who do.
There are no sane queers.
I believe the word is "queers", not "fags" which is a slur against any homo.
Gay is the sexual preference for your own sex, queer is being different for it's own sake and then shaming others for not being as different as you.
I believe I don’t care what pedophile enablers call themselves