Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

121
The Supreme Court has issued an opinion today that New York's regulations governing the issuance of concealed carry permits violated the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. Even with snake Cornyn trying to erode our gun rights, Clarence Thomas has expanded it! (mobile.twitter.com)
posted 4 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor 4 years ago by onetruephilosoraptor +121 / -0
38 comments share
38 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (38)
sorted by:
▲ 34 ▼
– CptLightning 34 points 4 years ago +34 / -0

It takes a year, multiple background checks, and like 4 vouchers for character to buy a pistol in NY state. Whether or not you were allowed to carry feels secondary to that issue.

So great precedent going forward but doesn't address the real issue

permalink save report block reply
▲ 33 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor [S] 33 points 4 years ago +33 / -0

The best part of this ruling is this portion:

"Since Heller and McDonald, the Courts of Appeals have developed a 'two-step' framework for analyzing Second Amendment challenges that combines history with means-end scrutiny. The Court rejects that two-part approach as having one step too many."

Henceforth the "history and tradition" model will apply when courts assess the constitutionality of gun laws and regulations.

This changes the whole game.

We might be able to completely undo all of Cornyn's fuckery and more with this!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– elleand202 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I was just looking at several of the California gun cases like Rupp, et al v. Becerra and Miller, et al v. Bonta, and they are both currently paused pending the outcome of this case. I would suspect that the 9th Circuit will reluctantly craft their decision consistently with this ruling.

EDIT: It will be interesting to see what SCOTUS does with Duncan v. Bonta, which earlier tossed the magazine ban but the full panel overruled it and is now pending cert.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Mistercheif 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

They can only address the issue brought to them, but by setting a new standard for review for 2A cases, they've set the stage to challenge those laws too. Undoing a century of authoritarianism in New York will take time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Kaarous 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

You forgot to add "several bribes to the sheriff's office."

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

It takes a year and like 5 background checks to buy a pistol in NY state

Really a year, or is that exaggeration?

Because I've seen gun rights advocates get mad even over 3 day waiting periods. A year seems completely mad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– smashyawaro 22 points 4 years ago +22 / -0

This isn't NY, but in California, they required registration of rifles under their new assault weapon definition. Thousands of people sent in registration forms, but even with a year, the state failed to process them due to being "understaffed". They closed the registration period, and so people sued. It took another year or so for the courts to rule for them to open the period again, and people are still complaining that their forms haven't been approved again. CA DOJ loves playing dirty tricks like this, such as raiding gun shops for off list lowers and going "oops" after the courts rule the stores were operating legally. I wouldn't expect NY to be better.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– CptLightning 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0

No specific waiting period to buy the gun itself, but background checks etc before you are allowed a handgun permit easily takes 6 months if you're lucky. A year is not outside the realm of reasonable expectation here

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

That is crazy, I thought these background checks were basically instantaneous.

How come states like Texas can do them instantaneously? Or is just a criminal background check different from the NY style.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– CptLightning 21 points 4 years ago +21 / -0

Anarcho-tyranny. NY really doesn't want you to have guns so they will drag their feet every step of the way.

Edit: The real time-consumer is that NY sends people out to interview your friends/family you use as references on your permit application. Ostensibly to make sure you're not crazy or unqualified to own a weapon. Maybe this goes away as the court ruling strikes down May-Issue entirely and forces every state to be Shall-Issue in the context of CC, so I don't see why it wouldn't also be applied to ownership

Some counties are better than others, but in any of the ones housing the big cities (Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, NYC ofc) you'll have to wait a long time

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– JediDwag 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Ridiculous levels of infringement. The founding fathers are rolling in their graves.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– almond_activator 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Serialization is an infringement, FFLs are an infringement, NFA 'tax' stamps are an infringement, the automatic registry is an infringement, and its closure a double infringement.

It all needs to be struck down.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Wizardslayer 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

They just do everything to discourage you from getting it. They could do it all in an afternoon while you waited for the most part. But NY especially NYC tries to dig up anything on you to deny you.

Then in NYC they make it even harder because you can't just go buy a gun. You have to get a purchase authorization which takes 3 to 6 months to process. Then you have 30 days to buy a gun, if you don't buy it in 30 days the authorization expires. After you buy the gun then you have to take it to one specific place for NYPD to inspect the gun because they don't trust the FFLs.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– discourse_friendly 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

There's an FBI background check required for any gun purchase from any federally licensed dealer. During periods of low sales volumes its usually 10 minutes - 2 hours. depending on if your name is popular or not. Archimedes Link Usoro will have their background check come back a lot faster than John Smith The last Gun i bought, during the 2020 "summer of love" the background check took 3 weeks. I bought one in 2008 at a gun show and the dealer got an answer back with in a few minutes. He called it in.

Now some states and or cities have a waiting period on top of that. sometimes it depends what you're buying. bolt action riffles versus a hand gun or modern sporting riffle.

Nevada has no waiting period. California has a 10 day waiting period. I think (I could be wrong) you have to pass your background check before you can pay for the gun. and after you pay the waiting period starts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– thepalagoon 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I bought my first gun during the summer of love -- on a saturday morning it (edit: the background check) took about 5 minutes.

Perhaps being deep in red middle america played a part.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TriangleGang 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I anticipate waiting periods will go the way of the dodo. No basis in history and tradition at the time the 2nd Amendment was drafted.

It's going to be a great few years as gun control regulations across the country fall.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– elleand202 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

My guess is that the national standard would be upheld as reasonable, delayed for as long as it takes to receive a "proceed", or three days, whichever is shorter.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– realerfunction 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

that's not reasonable. cash on the counter, walk out with gun.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– elleand202 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

The last Gun i bought, during the 2020 "summer of love" the background check took 3 weeks.

What state was this? I was under the impression that if a state uses the federal rules only without their own, after three days of "pending", the store may proceed with the sale.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– almond_activator 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

If they submitted an electronic background check request, it could've been processed almost instantaneously.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– brimshae 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

I thought these background checks were basically instantaneous.

They are. It's just when they decide to getting around to doing them/releasing the instant check.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– KeeperOfTheGate 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

So gun laws are state-by-state. They also vary by the type of gun.

In my state, a southern reddish state, it's state law that you must get a pistol permit to by a handgun. The county sheriff's office is responsible for issuing pistol permits. In some counties it's done almost instantly. In some blue counties, they will sit on your pistol permit as long as possible. One county stopped issuing pistol permits during covid, saying they didn't have the staff, and they got slapped down by courts.

When I applied for a pistol permit a few years back, I received my permit the day AFTER the legal maximum period the sheriff is allowed to take to review my file. My background check is clean, no criminal record, no debt, no nothing.

So, it's not a waiting period, technically, but you legally have to have one of these permits in order to purchase a handgun, or even to receive one as a gift from a family member.

Fun fact--for many southern states that have pistol permit laws, the origins go back to Jim Crow and segregation. Make blacks apply to the local sheriff for a pistol permit, then turn them down, because, reasons. Authoritarians are going authoritarian, left or right.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– brimshae 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

In some blue counties, they will sit on your pistol permit as long as possible

If your state has a 2A organization see about getting a writ of mandamus filed any/the next time they do that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– DefinitelyNotIGN 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

the origins go back to Jim Crow and segregation.

So... It was the left then, and it was the left now? Not sure how that tracks with your "left or right" statement follow-up.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– realerfunction 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

that's not a right authoritarian thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– JustHereForTheSalmon 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

A 5 minute overview of the process, as described by John Stossel.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– TakenusernameA 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

Clarence and Alito are the only reliable members of the court.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor [S] 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

Today is the birthday of my favorite Justice Thomas!

May he have many more returns of this day.

Thomas has given us all a gift today.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Ahaus667 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

I love how they claim we have a conservative court when it’s really just 1.5 conservatives on the bench.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Bitswitch 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Anyone read the dissenting opinion? Heaven help us if libs ever take the court. They completely ignore the limitations set on government in the 2nd, instead they say there should have been a debate on whether or not the ccw restrictions increase public safety or not.

Like what the actual fuck? You wanna debate if a blatantly unconstitutional law increases public safety? It’s completely irrelevant, and given SCOTS’s ruling that LEOs are not required to defend citizens, just outright insane.

I am tired of criminals being treated better than citizens. It’s way past time for it to stop.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– Smith1980 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0

Great news

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BringTheCat789 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

And yet, I'll still be thrown in jail for 15 years if I get caught carrying the small handgun I carry with me literally every day of my life while travelling to or through New York.

That is the thing with gun laws for me. It's not about me wanting a gun or not wanting a gun. It's literally about throwing innocent people into prison for nothing. Ruining lives of harmless, innocent people is never acceptable, I don't care what the cost is of the other side.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– blackestknight 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Come on, do Roe v Wade already.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor [S] 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

That will likely be saved for the last day of opinions released so the Justices have time to be safely out of D.C when the pro-abortion rioters rage like BLM rioters did in 2020.

According to SCOTUS website there will be more opinions released tomorrow and the remainder released sometime next week.

I think we will have the end of Roe by Sat July 1st.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– warlord30 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I wonder what narrative the Doom Niggers are going to sling today

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BlueDrache 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Don't forget to be a terrible boat driver!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– elleand202 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I'll have you know that with constitutional carry, Texas is now the wild west, pimp style.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Assassin47 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

With a ringing endorsement like that no wonder it passed.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy