Penn will play Simon Choksi, an ambitious game inventor and product developer and a devoted single father. Simon can talk the tech-mogul talk but can’t walk the walk, and his dreams of being the next Bezos
And I remember hearing “you just get mad when you see a gay character”. A gay character here and there sporadically is one thing, nearly every show having this ridiculous push for lgbt representation that far exceeds the actual population is another thing entirely. Same can be said with race/gender representation
This isn’t about “representation” though… it’s about dismantlement and replacement.
They KNOW that the character of Santa Claus is a White straight male, married to a White woman. Just like the character of Mickey Mouse is a mouse, the character of Aladdin is Middle Eastern, etc.
Their purpose isn’t some neutral goal of “representation”, it’s explicitly to DISMANTLE White, Heterosexual, Christian things. They even ADMIT this now, it’s not even a secret.
I agree. I guess you are right. They moved past the over representation phase a long time ago. They may as well make a movie explicitly hating on Christianity. This is why I support pureflix and similar services
It's also about rewriting history. The same globalists pushing this propaganda are also pushing the Kalergi plan, to replace white people in their own countries with non-whites, through open borders and mass immigration. They're priming the population to accept the things being done to them. Why would the people think the current world is abnornal when all the media they're being fed is showing the "new normal". When you confront a normie about this, they'll often say "its always been this way". In reality, they've just been brainwashed to accept the boiling pot they're living in. It's also a form of demoralization. If you rob people of all their heroes and hero myths, they're much less likely to fight back, as they have no one worthy to emulate.
I get mad when I see gay characters because most of them are one-dimensional narcissistic sociopaths who's sole defining feature is an uncontrollable desire for sodomy.
In other words, they remind me of the average LGBTQWERTY activist.
In the sequel series, [Tim Allen] is on the brink of his 65th birthday and realizing that he can’t be Santa forever. He’s suddenly starting to lose his Santa magic, and more important, he’s got a family who could benefit from a life in the normal world, especially his two kids who have grown up at the North Pole. With a lot of elves, children and family to please, Scott sets out to find a suitable replacement Santa
Kal Penn will play Simon Choksi, an ambitious game inventor and product developer and a devoted single father. Simon can talk the tech-mogul talk but can’t walk the walk, and his dreams of being the next Bezos falls drastically short. But all that changes after a visit to the North Pole.
If you’re familiar with the movies, Tim Allen’s Santa’s real name was “Scott Calvin”, initials S.C.
Scott Calvin = Simon Choksi = SC = Santa Claus
Kal Penn is also gay… so you can bet Disney is gonna make a “Mr. & Mr. Claus”. This is unreal.
The plot of a well intentioned but otherwise overly rough around the edges divorced man learning how to have people not just rely on him but celebrate him is a spectacular message, especially in the face of the cultural shifts of the 90's. "I wanna be Bezos, I wanna be Zuck, I wanna billion dollars but I caaaan't." Sounds like the worst of Tom Haverford from Parks and Rec except as the protaganist instead of a whiny side character who exists to be contrasted against far more strong masculine figures, and in the end he's going to learn that money is useless don't own anything just kill whitey and you'll be happy.
Honestly I didn't know this until now, and that's after seeing him in House for a year and a half, and a few other things.
However it does now mean in retrospect "Harold and Kumar Get the Munches/Go to White Castle" had at one point in the same scenes/car:
Kal Penn, Neil Patrick Harris, and John Yo. The first being the topical gay Indian, the second being former Doogie Howser child actor and now gay "icon" who notably played straight womaniser Barney Stinson in 'How I Met Your Mother', and the third having been cast as Sulu in the woke reboots for Star Trek, who in their efforts to truly blur the lines between fiction and reality decided to make Sulu gay in the second reboot movie.
Despite having a daughter in the Prime timeline.
Who they still then included along with Sulu's husband in the second movie.
John Cho, I thought he was good as Sulu. As far as the gay Sulu thing goes, IIRC even George Takei was not happy with the change and thought it was disrespectful to the character. (What a shocking thing--someone who realizes there's a difference between actor and character.) Also, IIRC, gay Sulu was only indiciated in one scene and not particularly remarked on.
The fuck, I even looked up things and saw his name in something. I was planning to include it in my post and yet, didn't 🤔
My issue with how reboot Sulu was portrayed really is a general one of the reboots: Most characters were caricatures. Bad ones at that. The reverse Khan scene for example was both shit and poorly done. Too many characters made quips about things that might do that were literally just lifted references to the original movies, like when Sulu took the con at one point.
Chekov self destructs and takes the Klingon ships with him
Sulu chose not to attempt the rescue but ended up suffering a mutiny because of it.
Scotty tricks the test with math by using theoretical proofs that the test accepted despite said proofs being impossible in practice. When later debriefed by his instructors it turns out the proofs are Scotty's own work and he gets reassigned from Command to Engineering because of it, which was what he wanted all along as he only went into Command to appease his father.
Kirk, being the living embodiment of arrogance and ego reprogrammed the test. But unlike the reboot movies where he simply reprograms it to allow him to fire upon and destroy the hostiles present, TOS Kirk reprograms his own test identity, hails the 3 Klingon ships, and plays the "I'm Zapp Brannigan James Tiberius Kirk, BTFO" card which is precisely the sort of thing he then does in later life when he's an actual captain of a ship. At the time of the test he was still a cadet and yet already that sure of himself.
It can't happen if they stay consistent with what's come before. What we know of the Mrs. Claus reads:
"The cardholder acknowledges... one true love or better half - in fact a woman of his choosing, to be bound in holy matrimony and to be kn... not valid in the state of Utah."
Great catch and good point...but all this likely means is that the diversity hire "writers" of this dreck will need to rub a few brain cells together to come up with a "clever" way to retcon or rewrite that, probably the new Santa will need to sign a different contract that's been "updated" for modern times.
The goal is twofold, to (1) make money off nostalgia, and (2) retcon the old white-Christian-heterosexual nature of pre-21st century media and reshape it to fit modern Wokeist propaganda
Money is a secondary goal at this point. The real aim is to reimagine history as woke. Everything you've ever enjoyed is LGBTQP and support the narrative, didn't you know that?
True...I would've thought money trumps all for these slimeballs, but ultimately the number of Woke financial failures has proven they don't give a shit if it bombs, long as the propaganda gets out there.
Isn't this movie about a dude who accidentally murders a beloved icon before taking the role over and fully replacing him? Boy, a movie where an Indian murders a White Christian figure and after showing minimal guilt over the death he takes his job and replaces him very publicly sure is a bold choice for Disney. Not quite as bold as making a movie about a little girl selling tickets to view her puberty-changing body in light of the groomer bill, but it's still pretty topical.
Ah yes... Kal Penn gets a job from Disney after being an Obama Administration staffer and strong ties to the DNC.
And its cringe af
Well this will certainly put to bed any accusations Disney are groomers who hate whites, christians, straight people, conservatives...
And I remember hearing “you just get mad when you see a gay character”. A gay character here and there sporadically is one thing, nearly every show having this ridiculous push for lgbt representation that far exceeds the actual population is another thing entirely. Same can be said with race/gender representation
This isn’t about “representation” though… it’s about dismantlement and replacement.
They KNOW that the character of Santa Claus is a White straight male, married to a White woman. Just like the character of Mickey Mouse is a mouse, the character of Aladdin is Middle Eastern, etc.
Their purpose isn’t some neutral goal of “representation”, it’s explicitly to DISMANTLE White, Heterosexual, Christian things. They even ADMIT this now, it’s not even a secret.
I agree. I guess you are right. They moved past the over representation phase a long time ago. They may as well make a movie explicitly hating on Christianity. This is why I support pureflix and similar services
It's also about rewriting history. The same globalists pushing this propaganda are also pushing the Kalergi plan, to replace white people in their own countries with non-whites, through open borders and mass immigration. They're priming the population to accept the things being done to them. Why would the people think the current world is abnornal when all the media they're being fed is showing the "new normal". When you confront a normie about this, they'll often say "its always been this way". In reality, they've just been brainwashed to accept the boiling pot they're living in. It's also a form of demoralization. If you rob people of all their heroes and hero myths, they're much less likely to fight back, as they have no one worthy to emulate.
Alladin is black, bigot
I get mad when I see gay characters because most of them are one-dimensional narcissistic sociopaths who's sole defining feature is an uncontrollable desire for sodomy.
In other words, they remind me of the average LGBTQWERTY activist.
So they're accurate to the degenerates they're supposed to be?
"i didn't before"
Well. GLAAD wants 20% lgbt rep in the media.....
But it seems like more than that.
If you’re familiar with the movies, Tim Allen’s Santa’s real name was “Scott Calvin”, initials S.C.
Scott Calvin = Simon Choksi = SC = Santa Claus
Kal Penn is also gay… so you can bet Disney is gonna make a “Mr. & Mr. Claus”. This is unreal.
The plot of a well intentioned but otherwise overly rough around the edges divorced man learning how to have people not just rely on him but celebrate him is a spectacular message, especially in the face of the cultural shifts of the 90's. "I wanna be Bezos, I wanna be Zuck, I wanna billion dollars but I caaaan't." Sounds like the worst of Tom Haverford from Parks and Rec except as the protaganist instead of a whiny side character who exists to be contrasted against far more strong masculine figures, and in the end he's going to learn that money is useless don't own anything just kill whitey and you'll be happy.
Honestly I didn't know this until now, and that's after seeing him in House for a year and a half, and a few other things.
However it does now mean in retrospect "Harold and Kumar Get the Munches/Go to White Castle" had at one point in the same scenes/car:
Kal Penn, Neil Patrick Harris, and John Yo. The first being the topical gay Indian, the second being former Doogie Howser child actor and now gay "icon" who notably played straight womaniser Barney Stinson in 'How I Met Your Mother', and the third having been cast as Sulu in the woke reboots for Star Trek, who in their efforts to truly blur the lines between fiction and reality decided to make Sulu gay in the second reboot movie.
Despite having a daughter in the Prime timeline.
Who they still then included along with Sulu's husband in the second movie.
John Cho, I thought he was good as Sulu. As far as the gay Sulu thing goes, IIRC even George Takei was not happy with the change and thought it was disrespectful to the character. (What a shocking thing--someone who realizes there's a difference between actor and character.) Also, IIRC, gay Sulu was only indiciated in one scene and not particularly remarked on.
I can deal with that.
The fuck, I even looked up things and saw his name in something. I was planning to include it in my post and yet, didn't 🤔
My issue with how reboot Sulu was portrayed really is a general one of the reboots: Most characters were caricatures. Bad ones at that. The reverse Khan scene for example was both shit and poorly done. Too many characters made quips about things that might do that were literally just lifted references to the original movies, like when Sulu took the con at one point.
Also Kirk's solution to the Kobayashi Maru test was absolutely retarded. There's a book of the same name that deals with how TOS Kirk, Chekov, Scotty, and Sulu dealt with the test.
Chekov self destructs and takes the Klingon ships with him
Sulu chose not to attempt the rescue but ended up suffering a mutiny because of it.
Scotty tricks the test with math by using theoretical proofs that the test accepted despite said proofs being impossible in practice. When later debriefed by his instructors it turns out the proofs are Scotty's own work and he gets reassigned from Command to Engineering because of it, which was what he wanted all along as he only went into Command to appease his father.
Kirk, being the living embodiment of arrogance and ego reprogrammed the test. But unlike the reboot movies where he simply reprograms it to allow him to fire upon and destroy the hostiles present, TOS Kirk reprograms his own test identity, hails the 3 Klingon ships, and plays the "I'm
Zapp BranniganJames Tiberius Kirk, BTFO" card which is precisely the sort of thing he then does in later life when he's an actual captain of a ship. At the time of the test he was still a cadet and yet already that sure of himself.Reboot Kirk however was just a fratbro.
It can't happen if they stay consistent with what's come before. What we know of the Mrs. Claus reads:
"The cardholder acknowledges... one true love or better half - in fact a woman of his choosing, to be bound in holy matrimony and to be kn... not valid in the state of Utah."
In other words, Santa Claus must marry a woman.
Great catch and good point...but all this likely means is that the diversity hire "writers" of this dreck will need to rub a few brain cells together to come up with a "clever" way to retcon or rewrite that, probably the new Santa will need to sign a different contract that's been "updated" for modern times.
Because 90's movies need revivals now.
The goal is twofold, to (1) make money off nostalgia, and (2) retcon the old white-Christian-heterosexual nature of pre-21st century media and reshape it to fit modern Wokeist propaganda
Money is a secondary goal at this point. The real aim is to reimagine history as woke. Everything you've ever enjoyed is LGBTQP and support the narrative, didn't you know that?
True...I would've thought money trumps all for these slimeballs, but ultimately the number of Woke financial failures has proven they don't give a shit if it bombs, long as the propaganda gets out there.
They did this because Tim Allen has expressed opinions that are verboten.
Goddamn White Boomer Male saying Old White Guy shit, where did that even come from?? oh...
Tim Allen had work during the pandemic. He got a new remote DIY show with Al from Home Improvement (Tony Khan?). He's not been black listed yet.
Isn't this movie about a dude who accidentally murders a beloved icon before taking the role over and fully replacing him? Boy, a movie where an Indian murders a White Christian figure and after showing minimal guilt over the death he takes his job and replaces him very publicly sure is a bold choice for Disney. Not quite as bold as making a movie about a little girl selling tickets to view her puberty-changing body in light of the groomer bill, but it's still pretty topical.
Why grift on an existing franchise? Why not create an original film about Diwali then you can have all the Indians.
Feminism cannot create only corrupt or destroy.
Working for an audience is harder than simply parasitising an existing one, minor as that may be in the case of this franchise.
Because they can't.
Evil can only destroy.
Have you seen Indian cinema? It stinks!
Guess Disney wants to try their own Santa Inc.
Why is it that any rando on the internet could come up with a better pitch for a movie than a dozen writers getting paid for it?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13049934/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_4 you basically described his 2021 tv series.
Disney is pedo. There will be no revival.
#DISBAND DISNEY
Disney in the front line of the pervertization of children, (with parental consent, apparently).
Glad he offed himself in House.