Do you actually believe that all Jews support Santa inc? I can't tell if you are being retarded or genuinely retarded for believing in that. Monolithism is retarded.
This is why I just veer into white nationalism these days. There's always gonna be idpol, might as well go to bat for my team. No one else is gonna look out for us, as evidenced by the behavior of everyone like Jester who preaches "idpol bad" and then participates anyway.
Genocide of white Americans is successful, European culture is destroyed.
White nationalism gains power, removes every single kebab, things get really shitty for everyone who isn't a WASP.
Everyone puts down the damn ethno-centrism and tries to get back to "here's the local culture, it's welcoming to people who put forth the effort to integrate themselves into it. If you dislike the culture, go somewhere else." This is the only option that doesn't end violently, and it's looking less and less likely every day.
It wasn't the average American that started this fight, and I dearly hope they won't need to be the ones to finish it.
Everyone puts down the damn ethno-centrism and tries to get back to "here's the local culture, it's welcoming to people who put forth the effort to integrate themselves into it. If you dislike the culture, go somewhere else." This is the only option that doesn't end violently, and it's looking less and less likely every day.
I've come to the conclusion that this is a childhood fantasy. I wish it could work, but the evidence keeps stacking up that it will not. This is why so many in the pro-white sphere are openly discussing the possibility of balkanization. We don't want bloodshed but we recognize that continuing to pursue this fever dream of everyone living together will result in extreme conflict and desolation. The best course of action to avoid bloodshed is to separate all the disparate populations before it all comes to a head and forces open warfare.
On the flipside however, this is my fucking country and I don't want to have to relinquish any of it to foreigners. Not sure if it's worth the fight though, particularly if there isn't sufficient will to win that fight.
So... can people get as angry as you are when everyone here is against anti-white sentiment? Apparently it is ok to attack Jews here, but not ok to attack whites. Despite me being against both attacks.
Ah, I understand now, confession through projection. People here are allowed to criticize or be angry at anti-white sentiments and attack(and blame their failures) on Jews. Others and I are not allowed to tell these idiots that they are using the same ideas and tactics these SJWs use against whites.
In other words I will quote you. "Idpol bad... except for me".
Comment Approved: It's very borderline, but there is a reality that politicians will cater to specific demographics. Killroyomega hasn't said anything about a vast jewish conspiracy, just criticism of appealing to a specific ethnic group.
But would it be wrong to say "quietly doing the bidding of jews" if he were to, say, declare that he would refuse to criminalize circumcision in order to protect religious freedom? Well, no. Jews, mostly by definition, are going to want circumcision not criminalized. That's not the same as a racial conspiracy.
It's not going to be white supremacy either if someone was "catering to whites" by increasing police funding. Politicians regularly appeal to demographics, and those demographics may, in abstract, favor one policy or another.
Take another example, the Labour Party clearly isn't taking any strong actions against grooming gangs in the UK, nor are they taking any action against antisemitism in those communities either. Why? Well, the Pakistani Muslim migrant community in those communities heavily favors or runs apologetics for both of those things. They are catering to Pakistani Muslims. That's not evidence of a conspiracy.
As royalty you might even get invited to the torture and execution of a prominent journalist! Being a prince and all, the cops will let you cut off any limb you want.
(edit: just saw your other comment... I think we're on the same page)
Whether that is good or bad depends on who is involved. If they just target BDS for trying to support a genocidal war and the Black Hebrew Israelites for street-level thuggery, great! If it tries to protect anti-white, anti-Jewish Marxists under the same umbrella or tries to pretend male genital mutilation should be above reproach, it's going to be shit.
It'll be shit then. As far as I'm concerned we know where the vast majority of any anti-semitism is coming from and it isn't whites. You'd have no idea if you just listened to the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, though!
That guy has been an open shill for Israel and jews in general for his entire time here. That's the one thing he's always consistent on. Everything he'll bullshit for the one thread, but he will never miss an opportunity to protect the tribe.
First two things they need to tackle are the college campuses and ghettos where the real antisemites live, and take on the ADL and other bad actors who have "bigot!!!" tourettes.
What do you think the commission's findings will be, and what controls do you think the state should put in place to "combat anti-semitism"? I'm not sure entirely what either of those words mean to Youngkin, so interpret it as you please.
It might make sense to a European - where laws to control what people say, where they work, and how and with whom they gather are more or less acceptable depending on who is in charge, but traditionally in the USA that's not OK. (well, ideally - obviously we've come a long way)
Personally I think this was just throwing a bone to the Israel First crowd aka big donors. He's not going to do anything but waste the state's money on some feel-good proclamation.
Not sure as he only wrote a paragraph(more likely his aides), but some of what Generalboobs said would be good. I realize that giving information, factual information and facts to these antisemites is mostly a waste of time. Like trying to tell democrats that Russia did not collude with Trump. So I am open to ideas.
Definitely no to following the European method.
But I think you are right, he is a politician after all... And like all politicians, promises and no fulfilment. So yes, perhaps, and very likely, nothing will be done.
He certainly killed all the theories that he was just going to be controlled opposition. Turns out, we are now in a position where someone who only desires power can get it by enacting and enforcing populist desires. Ironic.
To combat the Bolsheviks we cannot afford these milquetoast centrist idealisms that will always be undermined and capitulated into nothing. Nor can we afford the conservatism that serves to merely be a slower form of liberalism. Only through hard nationalistic, racist, sexist, anti-gay, anti-jew etc rhetoric and platforms can the pendulum be made to swing once more.
Our ranks will bolster naturally as the common folk come to understand the truth of what I just wrote.
Perhaps I am getting a little ahead of myself, but its not over partisan loyalty. Its the same standard I hold to everyone and everything: I dont care if they pronouns in the bio, I dont care if they virtue signal on twitter, I care about their actions. And while it is admittedly early, it does at least show that if anything for many of these people its a defense mechanism, not a true belief.
Is Younkin only in this for the power? Most likely, considering his past affiliation. But as long as his actions taken are populist, he can have all the power he wants because he is doing the correct actions.
On the other hand, its a bit more (for want of a better word) "acceptable" when its a governor. After all, the states are supposed to have far more power, so it makes sense that a governor will have more power. Besides, everything I saw of those orders is about effecting things he has direct control over as governor (like getting rid of mask and vaccine mandates for state employees). So its not like he is usurping the legislature on any major issues.
cry. harder.
Does the fact that whites are breaking the jewish conditioning keep you up at night?
What conditioning and whites against whites?
They are decidedly not white. They will even tell you that.
They are. Sorry, facts don't care about your feelings nor the stupidity of leftists.
What? You thi k jews are a monolith? Only retards think like that.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
Do you actually believe that all Jews support Santa inc? I can't tell if you are being retarded or genuinely retarded for believing in that. Monolithism is retarded.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
The last sentence in particular about inherent values.
That's a yes, then.
Thanks for the confirmation. 👌🏻
No problem, glad I helped you come out of the closet.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: This doesn't get to that level.
Ok...
Sure buddy...
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: This isn't really harassing behavior.
This is why I just veer into white nationalism these days. There's always gonna be idpol, might as well go to bat for my team. No one else is gonna look out for us, as evidenced by the behavior of everyone like Jester who preaches "idpol bad" and then participates anyway.
There are three possible endings to this story:
It wasn't the average American that started this fight, and I dearly hope they won't need to be the ones to finish it.
I've come to the conclusion that this is a childhood fantasy. I wish it could work, but the evidence keeps stacking up that it will not. This is why so many in the pro-white sphere are openly discussing the possibility of balkanization. We don't want bloodshed but we recognize that continuing to pursue this fever dream of everyone living together will result in extreme conflict and desolation. The best course of action to avoid bloodshed is to separate all the disparate populations before it all comes to a head and forces open warfare.
On the flipside however, this is my fucking country and I don't want to have to relinquish any of it to foreigners. Not sure if it's worth the fight though, particularly if there isn't sufficient will to win that fight.
[citation needed]
So... can people get as angry as you are when everyone here is against anti-white sentiment? Apparently it is ok to attack Jews here, but not ok to attack whites. Despite me being against both attacks.
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Threaten harass, bully, defame
Comment Approved: This doesn't do that.
Ah, I understand now, confession through projection. People here are allowed to criticize or be angry at anti-white sentiments and attack(and blame their failures) on Jews. Others and I are not allowed to tell these idiots that they are using the same ideas and tactics these SJWs use against whites.
In other words I will quote you. "Idpol bad... except for me".
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Reported for:
Comment Removed: Don't be doing that, even if he's annoying.
Ah yes, the "protecting my donors" promise.
Classic pressure release valve grifter.
Push a bunch of meaningless and vague bullshit, while quietly doing the bidding of the tribe.
Give it a year and he'll be full WE LOVE OUR SOMALIS.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: It's very borderline, but there is a reality that politicians will cater to specific demographics. Killroyomega hasn't said anything about a vast jewish conspiracy, just criticism of appealing to a specific ethnic group.
I think it does when he refers to "quietly doing the bidding of the tribe." as that means he is referring to some sort of grandiose conspiracy
But would it be wrong to say "quietly doing the bidding of jews" if he were to, say, declare that he would refuse to criminalize circumcision in order to protect religious freedom? Well, no. Jews, mostly by definition, are going to want circumcision not criminalized. That's not the same as a racial conspiracy.
It's not going to be white supremacy either if someone was "catering to whites" by increasing police funding. Politicians regularly appeal to demographics, and those demographics may, in abstract, favor one policy or another.
Take another example, the Labour Party clearly isn't taking any strong actions against grooming gangs in the UK, nor are they taking any action against antisemitism in those communities either. Why? Well, the Pakistani Muslim migrant community in those communities heavily favors or runs apologetics for both of those things. They are catering to Pakistani Muslims. That's not evidence of a conspiracy.
Do they even have enough of a MENA population for it to be worth the bother? /s
As royalty you might even get invited to the torture and execution of a prominent journalist! Being a prince and all, the cops will let you cut off any limb you want.
(edit: just saw your other comment... I think we're on the same page)
You can do the same thing just by leaving your webcam on for an hour.
It has certainly contributed to my hatred for the mall. The mall is basically foreign territory these days. Very few Americans there.
Yeah every mall. Or, basically going outside. Fuck the cities. White people have been moving away in droves.
And anyone's surprised why? We already know Repubs aren't going to distance themselves from the tiny hats.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: Again, this is not claiming that jews are inferior. This is a point about republicans appealing to a demographic.
Whether that is good or bad depends on who is involved. If they just target BDS for trying to support a genocidal war and the Black Hebrew Israelites for street-level thuggery, great! If it tries to protect anti-white, anti-Jewish Marxists under the same umbrella or tries to pretend male genital mutilation should be above reproach, it's going to be shit.
It'll be shit then. As far as I'm concerned we know where the vast majority of any anti-semitism is coming from and it isn't whites. You'd have no idea if you just listened to the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center, though!
So, all good things! I like him!
See here folks, the end point of all contrarianism. Reflexive responses. As long as you think everyone will hate it, you must love it.
It's not contrarianism at all.
That guy has been an open shill for Israel and jews in general for his entire time here. That's the one thing he's always consistent on. Everything he'll bullshit for the one thread, but he will never miss an opportunity to protect the tribe.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This is not how that rule works, it's actually a condemnation of a user.
First two things they need to tackle are the college campuses and ghettos where the real antisemites live, and take on the ADL and other bad actors who have "bigot!!!" tourettes.
I have to agree there. Hope he does more or at least some of what you suggested. We only got a paragraph(AFAIK) of what heplans to do.
What do you think the commission's findings will be, and what controls do you think the state should put in place to "combat anti-semitism"? I'm not sure entirely what either of those words mean to Youngkin, so interpret it as you please.
It might make sense to a European - where laws to control what people say, where they work, and how and with whom they gather are more or less acceptable depending on who is in charge, but traditionally in the USA that's not OK. (well, ideally - obviously we've come a long way)
Personally I think this was just throwing a bone to the Israel First crowd aka big donors. He's not going to do anything but waste the state's money on some feel-good proclamation.
Not sure as he only wrote a paragraph(more likely his aides), but some of what Generalboobs said would be good. I realize that giving information, factual information and facts to these antisemites is mostly a waste of time. Like trying to tell democrats that Russia did not collude with Trump. So I am open to ideas.
Definitely no to following the European method.
But I think you are right, he is a politician after all... And like all politicians, promises and no fulfilment. So yes, perhaps, and very likely, nothing will be done.
He certainly killed all the theories that he was just going to be controlled opposition. Turns out, we are now in a position where someone who only desires power can get it by enacting and enforcing populist desires. Ironic.
he still hired pronouns.
Ok. It clearly has no influence on his policies or enforcement of said policies, so what's your point?
it's unacceptable for a conservative to hire leftist trash.
Which is why we need something beyond Conservatives. This is entirely in line with Convervatism. They play to lose, not to win.
The far right welcomes you with open arms.
To combat the Bolsheviks we cannot afford these milquetoast centrist idealisms that will always be undermined and capitulated into nothing. Nor can we afford the conservatism that serves to merely be a slower form of liberalism. Only through hard nationalistic, racist, sexist, anti-gay, anti-jew etc rhetoric and platforms can the pendulum be made to swing once more.
Our ranks will bolster naturally as the common folk come to understand the truth of what I just wrote.
https://i.imgur.com/wdjd2Vg.png
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: He explained the ideology, and did not actually make an attack.
And yet... stormcuck ranks is always dwindling.
We'll see over time.
yet
Perhaps I am getting a little ahead of myself, but its not over partisan loyalty. Its the same standard I hold to everyone and everything: I dont care if they pronouns in the bio, I dont care if they virtue signal on twitter, I care about their actions. And while it is admittedly early, it does at least show that if anything for many of these people its a defense mechanism, not a true belief.
Is Younkin only in this for the power? Most likely, considering his past affiliation. But as long as his actions taken are populist, he can have all the power he wants because he is doing the correct actions.
Yes, because I expect every politician to just pump out EOs like some sort of magistrate.
On the other hand, its a bit more (for want of a better word) "acceptable" when its a governor. After all, the states are supposed to have far more power, so it makes sense that a governor will have more power. Besides, everything I saw of those orders is about effecting things he has direct control over as governor (like getting rid of mask and vaccine mandates for state employees). So its not like he is usurping the legislature on any major issues.