That guy has been an open shill for Israel and jews in general for his entire time here. That's the one thing he's always consistent on. Everything he'll bullshit for the one thread, but he will never miss an opportunity to protect the tribe.
What do you think the commission's findings will be, and what controls do you think the state should put in place to "combat anti-semitism"? I'm not sure entirely what either of those words mean to Youngkin, so interpret it as you please.
It might make sense to a European - where laws to control what people say, where they work, and how and with whom they gather are more or less acceptable depending on who is in charge, but traditionally in the USA that's not OK. (well, ideally - obviously we've come a long way)
Personally I think this was just throwing a bone to the Israel First crowd aka big donors. He's not going to do anything but waste the state's money on some feel-good proclamation.
Not sure as he only wrote a paragraph(more likely his aides), but some of what Generalboobs said would be good. I realize that giving information, factual information and facts to these antisemites is mostly a waste of time. Like trying to tell democrats that Russia did not collude with Trump. So I am open to ideas.
Definitely no to following the European method.
But I think you are right, he is a politician after all... And like all politicians, promises and no fulfilment. So yes, perhaps, and very likely, nothing will be done.
First two things they need to tackle are the college campuses and ghettos where the real antisemites live, and take on the ADL and other bad actors who have "bigot!!!" tourettes.
He certainly killed all the theories that he was just going to be controlled opposition. Turns out, we are now in a position where someone who only desires power can get it by enacting and enforcing populist desires. Ironic.
On the other hand, its a bit more (for want of a better word) "acceptable" when its a governor. After all, the states are supposed to have far more power, so it makes sense that a governor will have more power. Besides, everything I saw of those orders is about effecting things he has direct control over as governor (like getting rid of mask and vaccine mandates for state employees). So its not like he is usurping the legislature on any major issues.
So, all good things! I like him!
See here folks, the end point of all contrarianism. Reflexive responses. As long as you think everyone will hate it, you must love it.
It's not contrarianism at all.
That guy has been an open shill for Israel and jews in general for his entire time here. That's the one thing he's always consistent on. Everything he'll bullshit for the one thread, but he will never miss an opportunity to protect the tribe.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This is not how that rule works, it's actually a condemnation of a user.
What do you think the commission's findings will be, and what controls do you think the state should put in place to "combat anti-semitism"? I'm not sure entirely what either of those words mean to Youngkin, so interpret it as you please.
It might make sense to a European - where laws to control what people say, where they work, and how and with whom they gather are more or less acceptable depending on who is in charge, but traditionally in the USA that's not OK. (well, ideally - obviously we've come a long way)
Personally I think this was just throwing a bone to the Israel First crowd aka big donors. He's not going to do anything but waste the state's money on some feel-good proclamation.
Not sure as he only wrote a paragraph(more likely his aides), but some of what Generalboobs said would be good. I realize that giving information, factual information and facts to these antisemites is mostly a waste of time. Like trying to tell democrats that Russia did not collude with Trump. So I am open to ideas.
Definitely no to following the European method.
But I think you are right, he is a politician after all... And like all politicians, promises and no fulfilment. So yes, perhaps, and very likely, nothing will be done.
First two things they need to tackle are the college campuses and ghettos where the real antisemites live, and take on the ADL and other bad actors who have "bigot!!!" tourettes.
I have to agree there. Hope he does more or at least some of what you suggested. We only got a paragraph(AFAIK) of what heplans to do.
He certainly killed all the theories that he was just going to be controlled opposition. Turns out, we are now in a position where someone who only desires power can get it by enacting and enforcing populist desires. Ironic.
he still hired pronouns.
Ok. It clearly has no influence on his policies or enforcement of said policies, so what's your point?
it's unacceptable for a conservative to hire leftist trash.
We'll see over time.
yet
Yes, because I expect every politician to just pump out EOs like some sort of magistrate.
On the other hand, its a bit more (for want of a better word) "acceptable" when its a governor. After all, the states are supposed to have far more power, so it makes sense that a governor will have more power. Besides, everything I saw of those orders is about effecting things he has direct control over as governor (like getting rid of mask and vaccine mandates for state employees). So its not like he is usurping the legislature on any major issues.