But would it be wrong to say "quietly doing the bidding of jews" if he were to, say, declare that he would refuse to criminalize circumcision in order to protect religious freedom? Well, no. Jews, mostly by definition, are going to want circumcision not criminalized. That's not the same as a racial conspiracy.
It's not going to be white supremacy either if someone was "catering to whites" by increasing police funding. Politicians regularly appeal to demographics, and those demographics may, in abstract, favor one policy or another.
Take another example, the Labour Party clearly isn't taking any strong actions against grooming gangs in the UK, nor are they taking any action against antisemitism in those communities either. Why? Well, the Pakistani Muslim migrant community in those communities heavily favors or runs apologetics for both of those things. They are catering to Pakistani Muslims. That's not evidence of a conspiracy.
I think it does when he refers to "quietly doing the bidding of the tribe." as that means he is referring to some sort of grandiose conspiracy
But would it be wrong to say "quietly doing the bidding of jews" if he were to, say, declare that he would refuse to criminalize circumcision in order to protect religious freedom? Well, no. Jews, mostly by definition, are going to want circumcision not criminalized. That's not the same as a racial conspiracy.
It's not going to be white supremacy either if someone was "catering to whites" by increasing police funding. Politicians regularly appeal to demographics, and those demographics may, in abstract, favor one policy or another.
Take another example, the Labour Party clearly isn't taking any strong actions against grooming gangs in the UK, nor are they taking any action against antisemitism in those communities either. Why? Well, the Pakistani Muslim migrant community in those communities heavily favors or runs apologetics for both of those things. They are catering to Pakistani Muslims. That's not evidence of a conspiracy.