34
Comments (55)
sorted by:
26
Killroyomega 26 points ago +27 / -1

When the tranny rapes a girl in a locker room, will the court be found responsible?

Of course not.

Modern justice is a joke, a scam, and a perversion.

22
TeeBP 22 points ago +22 / -0

They'll just try to bury all the rapes like that one high school tried.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +9 / -14
21
Killroyomega 21 points ago +22 / -1

What exactly are you trying to argue for or against here?

Trannys are all mentally ill weirdo sex perverts.

I will never agree to cede them any ground, even if it hurts your "kill all women" credo.

0
deleted 0 points ago +5 / -5
11
Killroyomega 11 points ago +11 / -0

Their hatred for men is so deep that they have these insane (projected) conspiracies of men wanting to hunt them down, kill them and torture them.

Nah.

All the neurotic shit is a direct result of the feminine not being tempered by the masculine.

Women are not happy unless they are under the direct control of a man that they consider a powerful authority. They want to be used and most also want to be abused.

The issue is that "globalists" have broken the structures of family and government and set up the modern woman to be glorified wards of the state, brides of the government.

All that shit ends overnight if benefits for single mothers, divorce courts and family courts, and the anti-family propaganda was outlawed.

Men need to start slapping their bitches more when they do dumb shit or throw a tantrum. If the girl didn't have the idea that she could just run away and be taken care of, all that extra shit would disappear.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +3 / -4

In the same way that the existence of dissenting opinions in the world is because we aren't North Korea.

Yes, you could advocate for beating them every time they said something genocidal/hateful. Through conditioning, it would eventually work.

It doesn't really solve the problem though, it just makes them too scared to say what they really think.

I've noticed every solution to their hatred has that in common, to attach consequences to their hate to make it disappear.

Do you think all North Koreans love Kim Jong Un or do you think they're just scared of being shot? Their views haven't changed, they've been hidden because of the consequences.

8
Killroyomega 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, you could advocate for beating them every time they said something genocidal/hateful.

Note I did not say to beat. That's generally excessive. A simple slap is enough for most tantrums, same as spanking a child.

It doesn't really solve the problem though, it just makes them too scared to say what they really think.

Have you never been in a relationship from a dominant position?

If you aren't a faggot you can have your girl parroting your ideas and ideals in a few months from any starting position.

Women generally just follow whatever authority is most dominant in their life.

Right now it's the almost always the government and the government is filled to the brim with niggers and faggots and communists.

If you fix that issue women suddenly no longer want any of that shit.

Go look up opinion splits on the women's suffrage movement. The majority of women were against it and the ones that were for were for that because their husbands were simps and didn't tell them no.

The solution always starts and ends with men. Men must be strong and retake the dominant role. We have to build the patriarchy that women say they hate but secretly (openly) are turned on by.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +1 / -3

The actual level of force isn't relevant to my point.


When I was in relationships and believed in them, I was just a normie. Then I found TRP and started just pumping and dumping, then I slowly trailed off on doing that until the More Feminine Flu locked everyone down and I completely lost interest in them over my absence of contact with them.

Again, the fact that women follow their man is based on necessity. They don't want to lose their meal ticket. You're establishing consequences for transgressions again, but less obviously.

What I'm curious of, is if it's even possible to "deradicalize" them permanently.

16
bamboozler1 16 points ago +16 / -0

Oddly, you’re right about at least one thing: the RSL, which started out as men only (I guess they let the nurses in, sometimes), the Navy Club AND the former “Working Men’s Club” (latterly the “Workers Club”), in my city were ALL forced to admit women, then become “family friendly”, and now, every single one is broke…

Two out of three are being turned into Chinese apartments, and “social housing” (because the government would rather buy the workers club out, than allow it to continue to exist)…

It’s extraordinary. “Opening up” the spaces completely obliterated them. Meanwhile the notably still segregated “upper class” “ladies and gentlemens” clubs still exist, and still make tonnes of money…

Because class war. And because the same rules don’t apply if you’re a rich shit.

See also: the Anglican Church selling off literally hundreds of heritage-listed churches, mostly to be turned into apartments, to fund “child sex abuse” comp claims…

I fucking hate my country, I really do. 😑🤦🏻‍♂️

4
TheImpossible1 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's because the rich can afford to just pay them off by funding their next racket.

Eventually they don't accept it though, and claim for huge and unsustainable payments, like the $100m they grifted from Riot Games recently.

20
Realchebz 20 points ago +20 / -0

here's my take on this... I really don't care. This whole tranny bullshit was brought on by women. Yes they overwhelmingly vote this crap in and promote it on social media. When I've used to have facebook and gay marriage was a big talk of the day I can remember almost all women in my feed virtue signaling on this. And as expected gay marriage turned into LGBT into trans "rights". And now women are suffering for this. Why? Because trannies don't want 2nd class status of men, they want privileged status of women. And they will invade female spaces virtual or real. Look at the JK Rowling being canceled. Look at women sports being taken over. Same is probably happening to gender hiring quotas and women getting pushed out by trannies. Women got what they've asked.

13
GeneralBoobs 13 points ago +13 / -0

It is perfectly fine to discriminate against people in this manner. If there is exposure of genitalia, it should be legal to segregate and separate the sexes and those who are not quite sure where they fit. Making it illegal to have a business or club based upon gender is what started this bullshit. This was not a step in the right direction or progress, despite what retarded progressives crow.

10
TheImpossible1 10 points ago +11 / -1

But why are men's spaces forced to host women?

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

You don't get to make rules that force everyone to accommodate you, but you can still discriminate openly and obviously.

Send "women's spaces" to the history books once and for all. Justice for all that they took from us.

4
GeneralBoobs 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's what I am saying. Men's Only clubs and businesses should exist and no women allowed.

4
truenationalist 4 points ago +4 / -0

In retrospect it should be quite apparent that "forced" integration of sexes & races was really a social engineering effort being done TO people at the barrel of a gun. There were good reasons why we used to have men-only clubs, or spaces for specific cultures & races.

The destruction of these organic developments was the elite class taking a bulldozer to actual cultures and starting their own homogenized globohomo ideal on the rest of us.

7
send_it 7 points ago +7 / -0

It is perfectly fine to discriminate against people in this manner.

One might even say it's necessary.

7
TheImpossible1 7 points ago +9 / -2

Well, when women withdraw their presence from men's spaces, we can think about it.

7
send_it 7 points ago +8 / -1

The right to discriminate again based on sex would also allow for men-only spaces to be legally enforced so idk what you mean.

7
TheImpossible1 7 points ago +8 / -1

Because we both know nicely that they won't accept that.

They'll demand their usual double standards, where they are free from everyone but each other - because they're incapable of even basic levels of co-existing with others who aren't like them and constantly reaffirm this assumption about them - and we are stuck with them invading our spaces to destroy them out of spite.

Fuck that. Send women's spaces to the history books.

4
send_it 4 points ago +4 / -0

of course not, which is why I'm in full support of trans rights.

The only way to stop it is to honk so loudly that the normies can no longer ignore it. Containment has failed and I don't see how it could be reestablished without radicalizing the genpop by forcing them to confront it.

3
TheImpossible1 3 points ago +4 / -1

I just want everyone to know that transgenderism was supposed to be a weapon against men used by feminists.

All the destroyed lives and harm falls squarely on them.

3
send_it 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh yes, certainly.

The way I see it though, if you want to get from one hill to another you'll have to walk through the valley.

1
Mpetey123 1 point ago +1 / -0

In their minds every male space was created by the patriarchy so it has to be destroyed. Down the road when there is equity, then there will be equal spaces for all groups. But until then only certain people get spaces.

5
dnile1000bc 5 points ago +5 / -0

There are many many exceptions. Women are legally allowed to intrude into men's spaces.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/eo4s2y/bathroom_in_local_shopping_centre_only_has_unisex/.compact

3
TheImpossible1 3 points ago +4 / -1

And that's why I couldn't give a single fuck about their spaces.

3
send_it 3 points ago +3 / -0

With that many exceptions it should be easy for you to list them.

4
dnile1000bc 4 points ago +4 / -0

See my edit. In Canada and many other places in the western world, women can go into men's toilets legally.

In sports women can participate in men's competitions without having to transition (e.g golf).

In Australia, women are allowed to have women's only gyms whilst men cannot have exclusive sporting clubs.

2
send_it 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't see your edit, sorry about that.

Yes, that's the state as it is now. My point is, if it would be enforceable both ways (!) then sex segregation being legal would end the tranny problem and the women getting into men's spaces problem at the same time.

Unfortunately it's a moot point because the ruling parties are either women or simps, so there's no way it would be enforced equally even if the law were on the books. Hence my later comment about accelerating.

7
ukulele [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights has ruled that a transgender woman was discriminated against when she was banned from accessing the female changing rooms at an unnamed fitness centre.

The centre said it did not want other women and girls to be confronted by the transgender woman’s male sexual organs while in the changing rooms and had asked her to use the men’s locker area, the women’s toilets or the staff changing area instead.

The transgender woman, who had not undergone a sex change operation, refused and complained to the human rights institute. The institute said in its ruling that in Dutch law ‘a sex-change operation is not (no longer) necessary to be recognised in the opposite sex’. This means, the institute said, ‘you cannot make a distinction between ciswomen (a woman who was born with the gender characteristics of a woman and who also feels feminine) and a transgender woman, or grant one more rights than the other. They are both part of the same category: woman.’

The Netherlands introduced new legislation in 2014 to make it possible for transgender people to register that they are officially changing sex without having to undergo tough medical procedures, including sterilisation. The human rights institute has an advisory role and its findings are not binding.

3
GeneralBoobs 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they are just and advisor, disband the worthless cunts and redirect their funding to prisons where these perverts should be locked up.

7
Inthecocolime 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is how you make a fitness centre install cubicles for all people to change in.

The tranny just wanted to be a victim or expose their cock to children.

#howtofuckupsociety

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

Two comments, one calling people incels and one spewing TERF crap.

spinster(.xyz) is calling.

6
Inthecocolime 6 points ago +6 / -0

You make no sense. You think the fitness centres are terfs?

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +1 / -4

I'm saying you are one, based on your short history where all you have done is posted feminine insults.

2
Inthecocolime 2 points ago +5 / -3

Ha ha, look at this loser stalking guys on the internet, you have nothing better to do than be a little weirdo.

I guess not being able to argue for yourself you need to ad hominem attack, you know what they say about people that do that.

Hint: they are not very bright.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Ah, appeals to the in-group. Also a very feminine trait.

3
Inthecocolime 3 points ago +3 / -0

You really want me to be a woman don't you, sounds like you might have some"issues" you need to work out.

Try going to a prayer camp, they'll pray the gay away for you.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +2 / -1

He thinks everyone is a woman.

Except me for some reason, even though I continually call him out.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +1 / -1

I call it as I see it.

5
TheImpossible1 5 points ago +5 / -0

End discriminatory, sexist and exclusionary spaces designed for bigoted women to shut out everyone who doesn't look like them.

Don't you just love it when a weapon against you backfires on the user!

5
Knife-TotingRat 5 points ago +6 / -1

Look, I'm not sure why any single-sex space can be considered "safe" if homosexuals are allowed in them in the first place, and really, these should probably have had their own, third space all along if they're going to be included in society in any which way shape or form.

Frankly, it'd make more sense to be in a changing room with a male homosexual who has no interest in me, than to share it with some ogling lesbian ... but it wouldn't be fair to the gay guy.

This kind of nonsense is exactly why they weren't welcome in the military, even though homosexuals are drawn to single-sex organizations like flies to shit.

4
acp_k2win 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dont accept the premise that discrimination is automatically bad

4
Smith1980 4 points ago +4 / -0

For years believing you were something you are not was seen as a mental/psychological issue. Why the movement gained steam to affirm delusions is beyond me.

2
NihilistCaregiver 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just make a 3rd locker room and the door sign is ???

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +4 / -1

Why in the world should fitness centers, and other organizations, be forced to suffer great expenses because some people are whacked in the head?

2
NihilistCaregiver 2 points ago +2 / -0

I won't blame you for not seeing my invisible /s

The joke was that a tranny would be offended to go into a locker where the gender symbol was ???

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

So I am, because there is no question at all about their gender.

1
TakenusernameA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or just have individual bathroos.

1
bamboozler1 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does the exclamation mark (!) symbol mean, next to the post title of this one?? 🧐

2
Grumman 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you hover your cursor over it, it has a tooltip saying it means Not Safe For Work.