Their hatred for men is so deep that they have these insane (projected) conspiracies of men wanting to hunt them down, kill them and torture them.
Nah.
All the neurotic shit is a direct result of the feminine not being tempered by the masculine.
Women are not happy unless they are under the direct control of a man that they consider a powerful authority. They want to be used and most also want to be abused.
The issue is that "globalists" have broken the structures of family and government and set up the modern woman to be glorified wards of the state, brides of the government.
All that shit ends overnight if benefits for single mothers, divorce courts and family courts, and the anti-family propaganda was outlawed.
Men need to start slapping their bitches more when they do dumb shit or throw a tantrum. If the girl didn't have the idea that she could just run away and be taken care of, all that extra shit would disappear.
In the same way that the existence of dissenting opinions in the world is because we aren't North Korea.
Yes, you could advocate for beating them every time they said something genocidal/hateful. Through conditioning, it would eventually work.
It doesn't really solve the problem though, it just makes them too scared to say what they really think.
I've noticed every solution to their hatred has that in common, to attach consequences to their hate to make it disappear.
Do you think all North Koreans love Kim Jong Un or do you think they're just scared of being shot? Their views haven't changed, they've been hidden because of the consequences.
Yes, you could advocate for beating them every time they said something genocidal/hateful.
Note I did not say to beat. That's generally excessive. A simple slap is enough for most tantrums, same as spanking a child.
It doesn't really solve the problem though, it just makes them too scared to say what they really think.
Have you never been in a relationship from a dominant position?
If you aren't a faggot you can have your girl parroting your ideas and ideals in a few months from any starting position.
Women generally just follow whatever authority is most dominant in their life.
Right now it's the almost always the government and the government is filled to the brim with niggers and faggots and communists.
If you fix that issue women suddenly no longer want any of that shit.
Go look up opinion splits on the women's suffrage movement. The majority of women were against it and the ones that were for were for that because their husbands were simps and didn't tell them no.
The solution always starts and ends with men. Men must be strong and retake the dominant role. We have to build the patriarchy that women say they hate but secretly (openly) are turned on by.
The actual level of force isn't relevant to my point.
When I was in relationships and believed in them, I was just a normie. Then I found TRP and started just pumping and dumping, then I slowly trailed off on doing that until the More Feminine Flu locked everyone down and I completely lost interest in them over my absence of contact with them.
Again, the fact that women follow their man is based on necessity. They don't want to lose their meal ticket. You're establishing consequences for transgressions again, but less obviously.
What I'm curious of, is if it's even possible to "deradicalize" them permanently.
Nah.
All the neurotic shit is a direct result of the feminine not being tempered by the masculine.
Women are not happy unless they are under the direct control of a man that they consider a powerful authority. They want to be used and most also want to be abused.
The issue is that "globalists" have broken the structures of family and government and set up the modern woman to be glorified wards of the state, brides of the government.
All that shit ends overnight if benefits for single mothers, divorce courts and family courts, and the anti-family propaganda was outlawed.
Men need to start slapping their bitches more when they do dumb shit or throw a tantrum. If the girl didn't have the idea that she could just run away and be taken care of, all that extra shit would disappear.
In the same way that the existence of dissenting opinions in the world is because we aren't North Korea.
Yes, you could advocate for beating them every time they said something genocidal/hateful. Through conditioning, it would eventually work.
It doesn't really solve the problem though, it just makes them too scared to say what they really think.
I've noticed every solution to their hatred has that in common, to attach consequences to their hate to make it disappear.
Do you think all North Koreans love Kim Jong Un or do you think they're just scared of being shot? Their views haven't changed, they've been hidden because of the consequences.
Note I did not say to beat. That's generally excessive. A simple slap is enough for most tantrums, same as spanking a child.
Have you never been in a relationship from a dominant position?
If you aren't a faggot you can have your girl parroting your ideas and ideals in a few months from any starting position.
Women generally just follow whatever authority is most dominant in their life.
Right now it's the almost always the government and the government is filled to the brim with niggers and faggots and communists.
If you fix that issue women suddenly no longer want any of that shit.
Go look up opinion splits on the women's suffrage movement. The majority of women were against it and the ones that were for were for that because their husbands were simps and didn't tell them no.
The solution always starts and ends with men. Men must be strong and retake the dominant role. We have to build the patriarchy that women say they hate but secretly (openly) are turned on by.
The actual level of force isn't relevant to my point.
When I was in relationships and believed in them, I was just a normie. Then I found TRP and started just pumping and dumping, then I slowly trailed off on doing that until the More Feminine Flu locked everyone down and I completely lost interest in them over my absence of contact with them.
Again, the fact that women follow their man is based on necessity. They don't want to lose their meal ticket. You're establishing consequences for transgressions again, but less obviously.
What I'm curious of, is if it's even possible to "deradicalize" them permanently.
Not true at all.
Women WANT to be used and controlled. It's part of their genetic programming. If they don't have a strong man to serve then they are unhappy.
Again and again I'll say the point you're ignoring:
This is an issue of government replacing the family and emasculating men.
Yes and it's very easy once you get them out from under the system that pushes them into those radicalized views.
So you broke yourself the same way most women have. Good job profaner.