Imagine doing this to your kid
(i.imgur.com)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
I can’t believe in 2021 people still pretend that it isn’t black people doing the lynching.
That SUV was a gud boy that dindu nothing.
you misspelled nuffin*
My unconcious bias for proper spelling has exposed my inner white supremacist.
Actually, I tricked you into appropriating more AAVE and THAT'S what exposed you. Checkmate KKKraKKKa.
Imagine being a kid dumb enough to believe it when everything is now recorded and there are zero lynchings.
Bet she also teaches them how to game the system for free shit.
Shooting them would be legal in most states. You'd still go through a BS prosecution for defending yourself, but using lethal force to defend yourself against a Lynch mob is perfectly legal.
How else would they grow up to be hateful criminals with a chip the size of boulder on their shoulder?
Watching AOC livestreams?
That grifter has to stay relevant some how.
That's just child abuse right thar.
muh lynching
lynching is more of a meme than anything real.
Excuses me sir!
Juicey Smoley was almost lynched by two Nigerians that he hired in MAGA county!!!!1!1!
Unless you count that dragging death in Texas in the 90's as a lynching. Not exactly sure what happened there but rope was involved.
Oh and don't forget the "high tech lynching" of Clarence Thomas.
wasn't there a gay dude who was dragged behind a truck somewhere, too?
Yeah, who were the party behind that one...
I mean, you do that here all the time. You and the other shill constantly scream and whine about imaginary Nazis every time someone doesn't bow to your sacred cows.
So yeah I absolutely can imagine some nog lying to her children about that.
You're not much of an imaginary Nazi when you actually praised the Nazi regime. Just saying.
You made that up, you vax pushing Marxist shill.
I'm glad that you've wisened up enough to at least deny it.
But I'm sure you do remember it, because me calling you out there was the reason you started sperging outt at me everywhere.
Praising it and wanting to question the legitimacy of the official narrative is very different.
What 'official' narrative do you mean?
The official narrative just lists motive of nazi seems to be only aryan supremacy, when there were other factors in Germany such as they had to dig out of the debt hole by themselves as a result of loss from ww2. Why are there all kinds of races found in their ranks? Why are they so reluctant to say anything more concrete about Weimar republic? Why is it so hard to find any info about aforementioned subject? Big tech seem to censor them that you can only find the info about it in more obscure sites.
Not to mention I've been finding out how leftists love distorting their history for their own convenience. Given all these evidences, they try to sweep other side of the story under the rug several times, then wouldn't it be natural to be curious what else did they make it as an official narrative? I know one thing, watergate also seemed to have more to the story than it is officially known. And then there's this video that explains how the narrative was constructed for the masses to swallow. Then no shit, I would believe there's more to the story than just the nazi is evil official narrative.
Like I said, where are you getting this 'official narrative'?
?
This is cited to an unbelievable in every history book that I have read. Incorrectly, by the way, because (1) the debt provisions were abrogated in the early 1930s.
"Nazis" were a diverse bunch with a diverse bunch of motives. For Hitler, the war was about creating more living space for the expansion of Germans.
Who are 'they'? What are the 'concrete' things?
Maybe you should not be getting your information from 'sites', obscure or not.
You just keep repeating 'official narrative' without specifying what narrative is supposed to be the official one, and what makes it 'official'.
And you don't question it if the information is accurate, it could be exaggerated, after all victors write the history.
The historians that were responsible for the WW2 narrative. the concrete info I"m looking for is both sides of the story. We always get what the germans did were bad, we don't get the german side of the story.
Textbook history. Why would most people believe nazi are evil? Click on the links I gave you. I gave you the evidence why I don't trust the history I learned from textbooks, if you don't read them, there's no point discussing further.
And from my anecdote, I have a korean ancestry, I know from personal experience why you never believe only one side of the story. You have no idea how overly they vilify Japan even in children's book. Not saying Japan is saint, but you know maybe stop exaggerating shit and put their own construed narratives in books for children. I find it unforgivable when your government brainwashes children to keep the disputes ongoing. That's what Korea does, creating next generation of anti japan koreans that still rage at imperial flags. I find the pettiness frankly despicable, and I react towards that pettiness some people display with pure disgust. That is all. I don't really believe what the westerners say in general when there's heavy left wing bias in most media, even fox news isn't enough to tip it to the centre.
Historians write history. And this is often from the perspective of the people who have lost wars.
And who are they? What specifically have they said that you think is incorrect?
Again, where are you getting this idea? What work of history are you referring to that just says "what the Germans did was bad" while not presenting their side.
No serious work of history says anything of the sort. You can read books of close to 1000 pages without anything but an occasional hint that the author disapproves of Nazi atrocities.
Which textbooks? School textbooks are notoriously bad and inaccurate on many different fronts. That is because they are derivative and not written by actual specialists.
You get your history from Youtube videos? No wonder you are confused.
Neither of your links had anything to do with World War II.
Ah, this then makes sense.
I agree that exaggerations are bad. But it is historians who have done a lot to combat exaggerations. Something like the 'Gestapo' has a very sinister reputation, and rightly so, but actual scholarship shows that it was nowhere near what it has been reputed to be.
Not believing Westerners is an excellent strategy, since most of the nonsense in the modern world comes from the West.
Ahh, there's your problem...
Comment Reported for:
So, the slur wasn't directed at a user, but perhaps you should just stop arguing with AoV for today?
Perhaps you should deal with people trying to spam report others to censor them.
Apologies. I'll to keep a better eye out for spam
Did she explain it was always a woman’s false accusations that led to the lynchings?
Did you know Islam requires 4 male witnesses before a woman is allowed to testify that she was raped?
Just get your husband to explain it to them.
I don't have to imagine it. "Don't trust whitey" is an extremely common cultural trope in the Black community.
Only the bullshit "I can't believe in CURRENT YEAR" social media virtue signaling thing is new.
Someone almost nobody follows said something dumb once. Oh no.
Leo Frank - why the ADL was founded Lynching is mob justice but justice none the less.
I can't believe that in 2021 I have to explain to my 5yo daughter and 7yo son that communism is STILL a threat. That I have to explain this kind of menace still threatens them, because schools won't teach it.