Imagine doing this to your kid
(i.imgur.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Praising it and wanting to question the legitimacy of the official narrative is very different.
What 'official' narrative do you mean?
The official narrative just lists motive of nazi seems to be only aryan supremacy, when there were other factors in Germany such as they had to dig out of the debt hole by themselves as a result of loss from ww2. Why are there all kinds of races found in their ranks? Why are they so reluctant to say anything more concrete about Weimar republic? Why is it so hard to find any info about aforementioned subject? Big tech seem to censor them that you can only find the info about it in more obscure sites.
Not to mention I've been finding out how leftists love distorting their history for their own convenience. Given all these evidences, they try to sweep other side of the story under the rug several times, then wouldn't it be natural to be curious what else did they make it as an official narrative? I know one thing, watergate also seemed to have more to the story than it is officially known. And then there's this video that explains how the narrative was constructed for the masses to swallow. Then no shit, I would believe there's more to the story than just the nazi is evil official narrative.
Like I said, where are you getting this 'official narrative'?
?
This is cited to an unbelievable in every history book that I have read. Incorrectly, by the way, because (1) the debt provisions were abrogated in the early 1930s.
"Nazis" were a diverse bunch with a diverse bunch of motives. For Hitler, the war was about creating more living space for the expansion of Germans.
Who are 'they'? What are the 'concrete' things?
Maybe you should not be getting your information from 'sites', obscure or not.
You just keep repeating 'official narrative' without specifying what narrative is supposed to be the official one, and what makes it 'official'.
And you don't question it if the information is accurate, it could be exaggerated, after all victors write the history.
The historians that were responsible for the WW2 narrative. the concrete info I"m looking for is both sides of the story. We always get what the germans did were bad, we don't get the german side of the story.
Textbook history. Why would most people believe nazi are evil? Click on the links I gave you. I gave you the evidence why I don't trust the history I learned from textbooks, if you don't read them, there's no point discussing further.
And from my anecdote, I have a korean ancestry, I know from personal experience why you never believe only one side of the story. You have no idea how overly they vilify Japan even in children's book. Not saying Japan is saint, but you know maybe stop exaggerating shit and put their own construed narratives in books for children. I find it unforgivable when your government brainwashes children to keep the disputes ongoing. That's what Korea does, creating next generation of anti japan koreans that still rage at imperial flags. I find the pettiness frankly despicable, and I react towards that pettiness some people display with pure disgust. That is all. I don't really believe what the westerners say in general when there's heavy left wing bias in most media, even fox news isn't enough to tip it to the centre.
Ahh, there's your problem...