I work in the environmental compliance group for a construction company. Invasive species are horrible for native habitats and cause extinction in native species. The author is an idiot.
They aren't stupid, they've become aware that fighting invasive species in non-human environments undermines their position on human invasive elements.
Daily reminder that no net warming has ever been directly measured. Ground stations, satellite and tree rings all have to be massaged by software for warming to appear. It's strange how three totally different measurements all have hidden bias in the same direction.
They run temp data through pairwise homogeneity adjustment software, which in theory is supposed to remove inhomogeneities like someone built a building across from the temperature station so it gets a bit more shade so we adjust previous temperatures to compensate. In Hansen 1999 (https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_ha03200f.pdf) you can see the before and after for PH as it was used in 1999 and it would be difficult to see the minor changes unless you overlaid the graphs. A couple decades later and the difference between raw data and "adjusted" data is staggering. The data is figure 6 has been adjusted to where instead of cooling from 1940 to 1980 (which is well attested to) there's a flat curve and then the recovery to not even 1940s level (the rapid heating from 1880 to 1930 before significant CO2 emissions is also well attested to) becomes a huge increase to unprecedented levels. The only long term temperature data that exists is from the United States and that shows no net temp increase before the data is adjusted.
You can see in figure 5 that the rest of the world is supposedly heating up but the rest of the world doesn't have temp measurements. Europe didn't measure temps until the latter half of the 20th century when the US data shows the world was recovering from a short cold period. And outside US and Europe the rest of the world didn't measure temps until the 21th century.
Then the satellite record. It didn't show significant warming until it was adjusted. What really red pilled me on "climate change" was when I read an article that was smugly declaring that while the satellite record didn't show warming it's now been "adjusted" and shows warming. This was presented as some type of kill shot to "deniers". Climate change is fake and GAE.
If you've heard of Climategate, one of the main issues was the climate scientists stop using tree ring data as a temp proxy for temps after 1960 because the tree ring data doesn't show warming. Something is "wrong" with the tree ring data. All the defenders of climate scientists say it's standard to ignore this data because it isn't good- but they don't know why it isn't good they just assume it isn't because it doesn't match their beliefs. Wow. Much Science.
Probably written by some broad with half a dozen cats.
I think it's got more to do with Muslims than cats. They want to push this idea of "climate refugees" and it apparently includes non-humans.
And a really big nose, for some reason.
Aaaand now climate cultists are actively advocating for the destruction of local habitats.
I work in the environmental compliance group for a construction company. Invasive species are horrible for native habitats and cause extinction in native species. The author is an idiot.
They aren't stupid, they've become aware that fighting invasive species in non-human environments undermines their position on human invasive elements.
Why do I have a vision of climate change hysteria fueling government overreach in the not so distant future.
The not so distant future of "earlier this year".
Germany's supreme court already ruled that "climate change" overrides fundamental rights.
Wow!
Canada had it's first death listed as "climate change" recently because someone died of heat stroke. It's coming faster than any of us expect.
Germany =/= Fundamental Rights....anytime in history.
Around 20 something AD There was a guy named Joel
CrOsSeD StAtE LiNeS
And like many people, are not truly alive. Some don't make choices, but just react to their environment in the only way they can.
Dump a fire ant colony inside the writer's apartment, tell her not to be bigoted.
Oh my God. It's real article. It's actually fucking real. I didn't think there was anything left that could surprise me any more.
So I guess we can eliminate the endangered species list and protected wildlife reserves.
They have some fascination with genociding native species in today's day and age.
Environmentalists really are brain-dead.
No, they're communists.
Lol true
Daily reminder that no net warming has ever been directly measured. Ground stations, satellite and tree rings all have to be massaged by software for warming to appear. It's strange how three totally different measurements all have hidden bias in the same direction.
What do you mean? What hidden bias? And where can I find this data. Every time i search google it always gives me the BS climate change fudged up data
They run temp data through pairwise homogeneity adjustment software, which in theory is supposed to remove inhomogeneities like someone built a building across from the temperature station so it gets a bit more shade so we adjust previous temperatures to compensate. In Hansen 1999 (https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_ha03200f.pdf) you can see the before and after for PH as it was used in 1999 and it would be difficult to see the minor changes unless you overlaid the graphs. A couple decades later and the difference between raw data and "adjusted" data is staggering. The data is figure 6 has been adjusted to where instead of cooling from 1940 to 1980 (which is well attested to) there's a flat curve and then the recovery to not even 1940s level (the rapid heating from 1880 to 1930 before significant CO2 emissions is also well attested to) becomes a huge increase to unprecedented levels. The only long term temperature data that exists is from the United States and that shows no net temp increase before the data is adjusted.
You can see in figure 5 that the rest of the world is supposedly heating up but the rest of the world doesn't have temp measurements. Europe didn't measure temps until the latter half of the 20th century when the US data shows the world was recovering from a short cold period. And outside US and Europe the rest of the world didn't measure temps until the 21th century.
Then the satellite record. It didn't show significant warming until it was adjusted. What really red pilled me on "climate change" was when I read an article that was smugly declaring that while the satellite record didn't show warming it's now been "adjusted" and shows warming. This was presented as some type of kill shot to "deniers". Climate change is fake and GAE.
If you've heard of Climategate, one of the main issues was the climate scientists stop using tree ring data as a temp proxy for temps after 1960 because the tree ring data doesn't show warming. Something is "wrong" with the tree ring data. All the defenders of climate scientists say it's standard to ignore this data because it isn't good- but they don't know why it isn't good they just assume it isn't because it doesn't match their beliefs. Wow. Much Science.
Idiocracy
When they say half of women are mentally ill... i can believe it.
Only half seems a bit low honestly.
Psychology literally started because people wanted to know why women were looney.
"What the fuck is a snapper? Anyways, pass me the lionfish."
Can't wait to toss some Japanese knotweed seeds against the side of this moron's house.
This is what I'd give her property to enjoy the delicious invasiveness
Johnson grass, knotweed, burdock, thistles, blackberry vines, laurels, doused with a healthy dose of imported south american fire ants.
Theyre just trying to be consistent with their genocidal intent.
"space rocks"
and you understand