In before u/TheImpossible1 attacks the source (it's written by a woman): Attack the message, not the messenger. Each of these cases is sourced.
As long as there aren't serious repercussions for lying about rape and sexual assault it's hard to take any public accusation or declaration seriously.
Well I could attack the source for being written by a woman on an MRA site, but I know that those people irrationally believe women are their allies despite this belief being the core of why they keep failing to make any progress that isn't purely symbolic.
Eh? Janet Bloomfield and the Honey Badgers have been longtime MRAs and have consistently been MRAs for as long as I know. They haven't changed their views for a long time and have consistently defended Men's Rights.
They're a rare group of "NAWALT"s (Not All Women Are Like That). They know gynocentrism is real and that men have unfairly been denigrated in modern society and media. They also understand they hold "privileged" positions in society because of the left and they want to use that "privilege" as a means to defend men and advocate for men's rights.
Like, I get what you mean, a lot of so-called anti-SJW type of women who claim they're for men are unwilling to understand things like gynocentrism and whatnot, but the female MRAs are like the last group of people to attack - much like Ron Paul their ideology has been very consistent and hasn't changed all that much.
In my opinion, female MRAs simply exist to ensure the pendulum doesn't swing back too hard the other way if some miracle causes them to gain power and uproot feminism.
Fair enough, but in my opinion, that's a stupid opinion.
It doesn't even have to be consciously noted, but subconsciously, they are just trying to make sure that they're viewed as good people if men ever say "Fuck this. We've had enough of you psychos. We're taking power back."
Here's another opinion of mine: you probably aren't clairvoyant.
There's already strong sentencing guidelines for pedophilia but everyone has a story about them getting away with that
Everyone has a story about being a pedophile, and getting away with it before a court?
Also: I didn't say that there's something to change it. I said: As long as there aren't serious repercussions (not the threat of repercussions, not some law that says it's a bad no-no, but real tangible serious repercussions) for lying about rape it's hard to take any of these public accusations even somewhat serious.
I always think 'maybe I'd feel differently if I were raped, I never have been so I wouldn't know', but I'm of the opinion that if you don't immediately go to the police (within24-48hrs) of the rape happening, it didn't really bother you that much. By then there'd be no evidence because you've probably showered, and your memory is unreliable as to what he looked like because you've probably slept. So it seems you don't really care about getting some form of justice either.
But then by modern standards I'm a rape victim, so maybe I can cry about it when I go for an interview or something.
That's one of their word games that more people need to be aware of. "Sexual assault" could be something as simple as an unwanted advance. Seriously, look it up. If you look at someone in a way not to their liking, you just sexually assaulted them. It's a meaningless term that should be taken with the complete lack of seriousness it deserves.
I somehow know this has been a common plot point, girl is a bitch that does immoral and evil stuff but you find out she was abused and everything is magically forgiven. Only seems to work for girls.
Rape now means (a female or xir) regretting sleeping with someone.
or regretting not sleeping with someone
or being talked to by someone they don't like
or not getting a job
or not wanting to pay their taxi fair
or not wanting to lose their boyfriend they cheated on
or any other reason you can think of: https://avoiceformen.com/featured/13-women-who-lied-about-being-raped-and-why-they-did-it/
In before u/TheImpossible1 attacks the source (it's written by a woman): Attack the message, not the messenger. Each of these cases is sourced.
As long as there aren't serious repercussions for lying about rape and sexual assault it's hard to take any public accusation or declaration seriously.
Eh? Janet Bloomfield and the Honey Badgers have been longtime MRAs and have consistently been MRAs for as long as I know. They haven't changed their views for a long time and have consistently defended Men's Rights.
They're a rare group of "NAWALT"s (Not All Women Are Like That). They know gynocentrism is real and that men have unfairly been denigrated in modern society and media. They also understand they hold "privileged" positions in society because of the left and they want to use that "privilege" as a means to defend men and advocate for men's rights.
Like, I get what you mean, a lot of so-called anti-SJW type of women who claim they're for men are unwilling to understand things like gynocentrism and whatnot, but the female MRAs are like the last group of people to attack - much like Ron Paul their ideology has been very consistent and hasn't changed all that much.
Fair enough, but in my opinion, that's a stupid opinion.
Here's another opinion of mine: you probably aren't clairvoyant.
Have you ever met a female MRA willing to fight for men's rights? Arguing for them in blog posts doesn't count.
Everyone has a story about being a pedophile, and getting away with it before a court?
Also: I didn't say that there's something to change it. I said: As long as there aren't serious repercussions (not the threat of repercussions, not some law that says it's a bad no-no, but real tangible serious repercussions) for lying about rape it's hard to take any of these public accusations even somewhat serious.
You mean politicians? Yeah.
Correction:
A woman. Not women. A woman. An individual.
I always think 'maybe I'd feel differently if I were raped, I never have been so I wouldn't know', but I'm of the opinion that if you don't immediately go to the police (within24-48hrs) of the rape happening, it didn't really bother you that much. By then there'd be no evidence because you've probably showered, and your memory is unreliable as to what he looked like because you've probably slept. So it seems you don't really care about getting some form of justice either. But then by modern standards I'm a rape victim, so maybe I can cry about it when I go for an interview or something.
"sexual assault" is more along the lines of a guy at the bar touched her butt or an ugly guy hit on her
Or one of the peasants brushed against her in a elevator, the sky's the limit.
That's one of their word games that more people need to be aware of. "Sexual assault" could be something as simple as an unwanted advance. Seriously, look it up. If you look at someone in a way not to their liking, you just sexually assaulted them. It's a meaningless term that should be taken with the complete lack of seriousness it deserves.
Sexual assault and rape are not synonyms.
So women can be hostile towards men because of an alledged rape.. but people cant be biased towards a certain group if they got robbed or assaulted.
Or men can't be hostile to women after being destroyed in family courts or falsely accused of crimes.
Always remember with the left that the ends justify the means
"No bad tactics", "by any means necessary".
I would have preferred a regular plain old assault. The kind where you get your ass kicked.
At least she might have a black eye or a bloody lip to show for it instead of looking A-OK and expecting us to take her at her word.
I somehow know this has been a common plot point, girl is a bitch that does immoral and evil stuff but you find out she was abused and everything is magically forgiven. Only seems to work for girls.
Brunning And Stave©
Vaush is a pedo commie.