Every single female supremacist claims to have been raped. Is this some kind of bizarre deflection ritual that makes their dehumanization campaigns somehow okay?
It's like saying "Hitler had bad experiences with Jews so it's okay that he did the Holocaust."
It's not. It's an excuse for being a psychopath who never approaches the traits we expect in actual human beings. But why should I be surprised? They're always making some fucking excuse for why they say they want to kill us. Satire, just venting, not all women...blah blah blah endlessly.
AOC, you weren't raped. Everyone fucking knows that you're lying except for your deluded cult of self-hating men and psychopathic women. The only reason you brought it up is because you need to play the victim while throwing men's rights down the toilet. I'd have a lot more respect for you and your cult if you just owned up to being genocidal psychos.
I'm sure you wouldn't mind showing us the arrest record to prove that wrong though. After all, women never lie about rape. Except for Duke lacrosse team accuser, mattress girl, the woman who accused Neymar Jr, all of Trump's accusers, all the women who claimed rape to have black men lynched...should I continue or will she get the point?
I don't care about your past, it's not an excuse. Your cult tells men who have had their lives ruined not to hate women, time for people like you to play by your own rules.
or regretting not sleeping with someone
or being talked to by someone they don't like
or not getting a job
or not wanting to pay their taxi fair
or not wanting to lose their boyfriend they cheated on
or any other reason you can think of: https://avoiceformen.com/featured/13-women-who-lied-about-being-raped-and-why-they-did-it/
In before u/TheImpossible1 attacks the source (it's written by a woman): Attack the message, not the messenger. Each of these cases is sourced.
As long as there aren't serious repercussions for lying about rape and sexual assault it's hard to take any public accusation or declaration seriously.
Well I could attack the source for being written by a woman on an MRA site, but I know that those people irrationally believe women are their allies despite this belief being the core of why they keep failing to make any progress that isn't purely symbolic.
As such, it's expected they'd invite a woman to write because they're scared of being labeled as misogynistic. This is quite the contrast to myself, someone who gladly accepts all the labels and simply fires back. They're the side in a war that they haven't even acknowledged has begun yet, and it's a zero sum game they'll lose by 2030 if they don't realize.
That said, back to the topic. I've heard all kinds of horror stories about the motives for false accusations, so the article doesn't surprise me. It's actually a bit tame, but I only skimmed. Maybe they do cover accusations based on gender hatred and I just missed it.
I don't think increasing the penalty would do anything. There's already strong sentencing guidelines for pedophilia but everyone has a story about a woman getting away with that, whether they saw it on the local news or actually were a victim of said woman. I think I posted a few, way back. There's too many female activist judges, tradcucked losers who believe women are good at heart no matter what they did and a friendly media to cover for them too.
The only way to fix this is at the policing level but there's starting to be a strong enough demographic shift to prevent even that, thanks to diversity hiring that leads to gendered nepotism.
In conclusion, false accusations can't really be fixed without somehow fixing women's hatred. I don't know if that's possible.
Eh? Janet Bloomfield and the Honey Badgers have been longtime MRAs and have consistently been MRAs for as long as I know. They haven't changed their views for a long time and have consistently defended Men's Rights.
They're a rare group of "NAWALT"s (Not All Women Are Like That). They know gynocentrism is real and that men have unfairly been denigrated in modern society and media. They also understand they hold "privileged" positions in society because of the left and they want to use that "privilege" as a means to defend men and advocate for men's rights.
Like, I get what you mean, a lot of so-called anti-SJW type of women who claim they're for men are unwilling to understand things like gynocentrism and whatnot, but the female MRAs are like the last group of people to attack - much like Ron Paul their ideology has been very consistent and hasn't changed all that much.
In my opinion, female MRAs simply exist to ensure the pendulum doesn't swing back too hard the other way if some miracle causes them to gain power and uproot feminism.
It doesn't even have to be consciously noted, but subconsciously, they are just trying to make sure that they're viewed as good people if men ever say "Fuck this. We've had enough of you psychos. We're taking power back."
Fair enough, but in my opinion, that's a stupid opinion.
Here's another opinion of mine: you probably aren't clairvoyant.
Everyone has a story about being a pedophile, and getting away with it before a court?
Also: I didn't say that there's something to change it. I said: As long as there aren't serious repercussions (not the threat of repercussions, not some law that says it's a bad no-no, but real tangible serious repercussions) for lying about rape it's hard to take any of these public accusations even somewhat serious.
I knew I phrased that badly. Going to go fix it now. I meant everyone has a story of "them" (meaning women) getting away with it.
Just as a general rule, assume people like AOC will lie through their teeth to justify their actions and not even have the slightest hesitation.
You mean politicians? Yeah.
Correction:
A woman. Not women. A woman. An individual.
Individualism with them didn't work for Trump.