Every single female supremacist claims to have been raped. Is this some kind of bizarre deflection ritual that makes their dehumanization campaigns somehow okay?
It's like saying "Hitler had bad experiences with Jews so it's okay that he did the Holocaust."
It's not. It's an excuse for being a psychopath who never approaches the traits we expect in actual human beings. But why should I be surprised? They're always making some fucking excuse for why they say they want to kill us. Satire, just venting, not all women...blah blah blah endlessly.
AOC, you weren't raped. Everyone fucking knows that you're lying except for your deluded cult of self-hating men and psychopathic women. The only reason you brought it up is because you need to play the victim while throwing men's rights down the toilet. I'd have a lot more respect for you and your cult if you just owned up to being genocidal psychos.
I'm sure you wouldn't mind showing us the arrest record to prove that wrong though. After all, women never lie about rape. Except for Duke lacrosse team accuser, mattress girl, the woman who accused Neymar Jr, all of Trump's accusers, all the women who claimed rape to have black men lynched...should I continue or will she get the point?
I don't care about your past, it's not an excuse. Your cult tells men who have had their lives ruined not to hate women, time for people like you to play by your own rules.
Eh? Janet Bloomfield and the Honey Badgers have been longtime MRAs and have consistently been MRAs for as long as I know. They haven't changed their views for a long time and have consistently defended Men's Rights.
They're a rare group of "NAWALT"s (Not All Women Are Like That). They know gynocentrism is real and that men have unfairly been denigrated in modern society and media. They also understand they hold "privileged" positions in society because of the left and they want to use that "privilege" as a means to defend men and advocate for men's rights.
Like, I get what you mean, a lot of so-called anti-SJW type of women who claim they're for men are unwilling to understand things like gynocentrism and whatnot, but the female MRAs are like the last group of people to attack - much like Ron Paul their ideology has been very consistent and hasn't changed all that much.
In my opinion, female MRAs simply exist to ensure the pendulum doesn't swing back too hard the other way if some miracle causes them to gain power and uproot feminism.
It doesn't even have to be consciously noted, but subconsciously, they are just trying to make sure that they're viewed as good people if men ever say "Fuck this. We've had enough of you psychos. We're taking power back."
Fair enough, but in my opinion, that's a stupid opinion.
Here's another opinion of mine: you probably aren't clairvoyant.
Have you ever met a female MRA willing to fight for men's rights? Arguing for them in blog posts doesn't count.