Do UK cops do anything but police homos and trannies or otherwise act as PR for Social Justice?
According to a British podcast that I listen to, no, no they don't. They're basically just the social justice police now.
This is true, but way too many people are still afraid to say the same thing about homosexuality. Even among the red pilled community, you're not supposed to say that homosexuality is a disorder or mental illness or even a fetish... we're all supposed to pretend like gay marriage was wonderful and gay people are completely normal.
We'll never get back to the top of the slippery slope if people on our side can't acknowledge where the slippery slope started.
This is why I believe China will be where the new civilization comes up.
I'm not so sure. China wouldn't even have a civilization if it weren't for the West. Pretty much everything they have in modern China, they borrowed or stole from the West.
The Catholic Church has been around for nearly two-thousand years. If you have to go back that far to find an example where the church wasn't in a position of power and influence, you're more or less making my point.
That aside, the Catholic Church has little in common with the early church.
The early church were pockets of believers that rose up organically throughout Mediterranean world via the ministry of the apostles and their disciples. This early church didn't have an organizational structure with doctrines and a hierarchy determined by church politics. Most of this came later with the "Romanization" of Christianity, which only increased exponentially with Constantine's legalization of Christianity following the persecution of the first three centuries.
In many respects the early church had far more in common with modern Evangelicals, with their small in-home church groups and narrow focus on Jesus and the Bible, than the modern Catholic Church which has centuries worth of doctrines and traditions that have little-to-nothing to do with Christianity in it's original form.
I'd wager there are many scientists -- maybe even the majority -- that think what is going on in the scientific community is insane but are just too scared to say or do anything about it.
The Left operates like the mafia -- or more accurately, an authoritarian government -- using fear, intimidation and lies to control people. By trying to personally destroy anyone who disagrees with them, they create a culture of coerced obedience, and it only takes a few radicals to create this culture. In reality the number of insane radicals on the Left is minuscule but their behavior so viscous and their voice so loud, they've successfully fooled people into believing they're far more powerful than they are, which ends up being a self-fulfilling prophesy in a way.
Yes, it's true that people appreciate seeing someone like themselves represented on-screen, and this doesn't necessarily just mean race or gender. Seeing someone of your nationality, faith, sports team, profession, etc. represented in popular media can be cool and inspiring.
It's not a surprise that young girls would be inspired by seeing a woman scientist or woman athlete in media. Everyone enjoys it to some extent. However, the Left has taken this simple truth and twisted it for their own purposes. It's no longer about inspiring little girls -- if it ever was at all -- it's about disparaging motherhood, convincing women that careers are more important than families, and emasculating men, particularly white men, who are the primary opposition to the Left in the West.
It IS however the only earthly authority Jesus said can speak for Him. You can't ignore that scripture.
Nobody knows exactly what Jesus meant by Matthew 16:18-19. Anyone that says they do is lying. It's open to interpretation.
The Catholic Church is the dead husk of the old establishment. Almost all of their doctrines and traditions were created to solidify their power and influence over society. Of course they would claim Matthew 16:18-19 is referring to them.
If you spend enough time in scripture, it's clear the "church" -- the body of Christ -- is referring to the body of believers, not some human institution which is prone to corruption by human influence.
The scientific establishment has never had a good track record.
The eugenicists of the last century, the atrocities (human experimentation) committed by Japanese and German scientists during WW2, global warming alarm-ism, modern gain-of-function research leading to a global pandemic, the butchery of children in the name of "trans-rights"... just to name a few. There's a reason why the stereotype of the "mad scientist" has been around for as long as it has.
The "hard" sciences are for the most part fine because they are readily testable, reproducible and rigorously follow the scientific method, but the "soft" sciences are much more open to interpretation and manipulation and therefore ride the coattails of credibility that the hard sciences have earned.
You seem to be one of those people who thinks porn is bad, but people who have been saying "porn bad" have been 100% wrong in all their predictions about all the evils porn would bring to society.
They’ve been 100% wrong? Have you been paying attention to the state of our society lately? Things are far from okay, and sexual degeneracy is at the forefront of our problems.
Hate to break it to you, but porn is not good for you. It destroys your drive, harms your relationships and desensitizes you to perversion and degeneracy. It’s a large reason why our society started down the slippery slope in the first place.
Even if you disagree about the slippery slope (and you’d be wrong), many of the negative effects of porn are well documented at this point. You’re fooling yourself if you think it’s harmless. You’d be wise to heed the warning.
She didn't enjoy it "at the time" though. She felt really shitty about herself throughout.
You don’t seem to understand how these things work. You do something for the dopamine hit or the buzz or the high — usually as a way to escape from your unfulfilling life — but when you come back to earth you’re even more miserable than before. The shame, the guilt, the bite of your conscience, the emptiness of your life… you brush it off and pretend it’s fine but you just end up repeating the cycle. You literally hate what you do but you keep doing it because it gives you that temporary hit.
And keep in mind this dire state is usually only realized years after making the same mistake over and over, never realizing why they’re so miserable in the first place. This is why many people don’t change their until they’re well into their 30’s or later, if ever.
Everything you’re describing is typical for people in this situation.
There are well-known male pickup artists who can attest to the fact that this applies to men as well as women.
People like getting drunk and porn, though.
Yes, and people also like having sex.
The vast majority of people who consume alcohol and watch porn have 0 issues or regrets.
Do you have anything to back that up?
There are entire communities of people who disavow porn or alcohol because they hate what it does to them, and there is plenty of evidence of its negative effects on people… many of who unfortunately don’t recognize the negative impact until much later in their life like this woman.
The fact that you spread your legs for men who use you as a wet hole and make you feel worthless after is a totally different problem.
Not really. It’s regret for living a destructive lifestyle because you enjoyed it at the time.
Anecdotally, I know plenty of examples of people having similar experiences after living a lifestyle indulging in sex, porn, alcohol, drugs and even videogames. It’s actually quite a common tale.
Sam was super popular back when when the New Atheist movement was alive and well (~10-15 years ago) when hating on conservatives and Christians was popular with anyone under the age of 30.
Then the slippery slope hit the West hard and the cracks in the movement began to show. People realized none of the claims the New Atheists made about religion were actually true, and began to see how the New Atheists were just as dogmatic as the religious people they hated. This was assisted in no small part by JBP who introduced a new way of looking at religion that allowed atheists to appreciate its utility without requiring them to acknowledge supernatural influences. This was basically the nail in the coffin for the movement.
After the death of New Atheism, most atheists now are either (#1) fanatical followers of the woke religion, or (#2) normal non-religious people who see religion as silly at worst or useful at best, but either way far preferable to the woke religion that is in the process of destroying our culture from the inside.
Sam always had "Jesus Derangement Syndrome", and since Trump entered the political scene it appears he has "Trump Derangement Syndrome". Sam clearly has something wrong with him; a weak point or blind spot that he just can't get past.
Several, they're a good watch, but the first one which was on Sam's podcast was very bad. It may be worth listening to hear the trainwreck, but the second one on Sam's podcast was good and all subsequent ones were good.
So how dumb does a woman have to be to do a thing that made her feel "empty and demoralized. And worthless." DOZENS OF TIMES without learning her lesson? lol. Did I ever tell you what the definition of insanity is?
This is actually common for everyone, regardless of gender.
How many people drink heavily, watch porn or do hard drugs and regret it soon after, yet continue to do it their entire lives?
Human beings are weak. If something gives them short term pleasure, they'll create an excuse to do it even if it hurts them in the long term. Then they'll justify it after-the-fact and pretend like it's not a problem.
The religious leadership of many major denominations are part of the establishment as well. The modern paradigm is establishment + useful idiots vs. everyone else, so yeah, a establishment-lead inquisition would be the opposite of what we want.
I know this forum isn't very religious, but if this scripture doesn't sum up the state of Western civilization right now, I don't know what does:
For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged natural relations for that which is contrary to nature, and likewise the men, too, abandoned natural relations with women and burned in their desire toward one another, males with males committing shameful acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error.
And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a depraved mind, to do those things that are not proper, people having been filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, and evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, and malice; they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, without understanding, untrustworthy, unfeeling, and unmerciful; and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also approve of those who practice them.
-- Romans 1:26-32
Also:
But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come. For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, slanderers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding to a form of godliness although they have denied its power; avoid such people as these.
-- 2 Timothy 3:1-5
The West is in trouble, and IMHO all this degeneracy is being intentionally pushed and promoted by people who hate the West and want to replace it with a Communist "utopia" where the almighty state is your "god" who directs every aspect of your lives.
The OP's story actually pales to the one a few days ago where they found Monkey Pox infecting the anal area of a gay couple's dog, being the first recorded case of human-to-dog transmission, or the one from a month ago where children of a gay couple got Monkey Pox. Conveniently nobody in the media is actually asking the obvious questions in both these cases. Our culture is sliding down the slippery slope faster than even the most fundamental Christians thought possible 15-20 years ago.
It sounds smart to say “the victors write the history books”, but when evil people have the problem of leaving a trail of death and destruction in their wake, it’s not hard to see why they always lose in the end… if for no other reason that people are eventually forced to rise up and put them down in order to survive.
This perspective also naively assumes we don’t have any historical evidence beyond the written opinion of people in power, which isn’t true at all.
That being said, modern technology has the chance of changing this paradigm and actually giving the villains a chance to win by giving governments unprecedented power over information and making it nearly impossible to overthrow the power structures that can literally see and hear everything you do or say. Only time will tell.
I'm essentially on the same page as you.
I do believe nepotism plays a larger role for certain ethnicities or sub-cultures than others. Think: the Italian mob, where loyalty to the family was everything and disloyalty often meant death. Ethnicities and cultures with especially strong in-group loyalty will naturally be more prone to nepotism. Culturally Jews do value loyalty to the in-group very highly, so it makes sense there would be more nepotism. That said, it's not a specifically "Jewish problem", as you see the same strong in-group loyalty in many other groups like the Chinese, Italians, and Indians, for example.
You're also correct that this isn't a right-wing issue. The Left -- including many progressive Jews -- hates Israel and the Jews. Leftist Jews suffer from self-loathing just like white Leftists do, and believe marxism/globalism/communism is their salvation.
This idea that there's something magical about Jewish genetics that makes them more evil than everyone else is patently absurd. People often see patterns they can't explain so they use whatever explanation makes sense to them at the moment, having no idea how little they actually know. Racism is generally just people assuming they know more than they do, and explaining patterns they see with incomplete information, often to support some incorrect bias or moral intuition that they have.
EDIT: I'd like to add that there's ultimately a lot more going on here than the topics of IQ and nepotism. People also have an attribution bias when thinking in terms of groups rather than individuals, as well as the in-group versus out-group.
People are more likely to be racist because when a member of the out-group does something bad, they attribute it to the entire out-group compared to when someone in the in-group does something bad, they attribute it to the individual. The reverse happens when someone does something good.
There's also this pattern recognition bias that occurs when someone sees a pattern, they tend latch onto it and become blind to other patterns that might exist in parallel. For example, looking at a bunch of chickens with varying colors, someone might notice all the black chickens and wonder why there are so many black chickens, becoming temporarily blind to the fact that there are just as many red chickens in the group.
Human nature is a mess and most people don't have the wisdom or self-awareness to recognize when they're making these mistakes.
Great point.
From what I've seen of the show and heard about the writers, it just reeks of "single women in their late 30's writing about the struggles of single women in their late 30's". In other words, extremely vapid and shallow.
It's a shame because the lead actress is actually super talented. See: Orphan Black.
Honestly, all you need to do is not give them your money or attention, and that would solve the problem.
Men don't want women to be whores? Then stop being a thirsty simp.
Whores exist because there is demand for whores.