I'm stating a commonly accepted fact that is in every high school history manual. I'm open to the idea of it being ideologically tainted bullshit(wouldn't be the first time), but no the burden of proof isnt on me.
and i've yet to see any proof beyond "he didnt really mean it, trust me bro"
I'd have more sympathy for them if their plan at the time wasnt to genocide 90% of eastern europe.
its the deepest irony that the part of Germans that hasnt been stripped of its will to exist is the one that spent 50 years under the boot of the Slavs they wanted to genocide.
in my experience, their slacker types are very good at generating alot of "management noise", so that anyone not aggressively paying attention can be misled for months into thinking actual work is being done.
and then, once the con becomes obvious, the exec would need to come clean that he personally failed at his supervision duties, and wasted possibly hundreds of man-years. going into confrontation is risky, just from the corpo politics side, and then there's the threat of accusations of racism, so its a very unpleasant uphill battle. unsurprisingly most chose to cover it up instead, and pretend everything is fine.
the only reliable use i found for it is "awk on steroids". it is absolutely unbeatable at tasks like "write me a python script that reads a file and finds every instance of X while Y and Z are also matched, and print me context C around each match". saved me hundreds of hours.
but beyond that its very hit and miss. you have to ask questions where you know an answer exists, because you're getting a plausible sounding one whether one exists or not.
China be like "ooooh yes we'll take them all if you dont hurry! hurry up hurry up or we'll have them all! yess import them now or you will lose to us!"
Who do they think they're fooling by pretending they have an urgent need for males(with their maoist baby-girl-drowning history...), let alone a need for dishonest male slackers. if anything they need to shed off some surplus males. (by invading somewhere, maybe?)
eh. its a corpo bigwig, if he wasn't pushing leftist woke crap we'd hear about it and he'd stop being a corpo bigwig very quickly.
how you feel about friendly fire incidents among the opposition is up to you.
when its a dumb pro-rapefugee girl getting to face the practical consequences of her political advocacy, the consensus seems to be to point and laugh. no reason to see if differently in this case.
so, its about setting stinky things on fire, i read that right?