Simple. Ask the potential Pope what his stance is on Jews and then have him go public with his views on Jews. Only elect a Pope who is absolutely vicious on Jews, condemning them to hell as being a cursed race. Anyone nice to Jews, you don't elect.
I know, I know. This seems trivial or Nazi or whatever but trust me, it will 100% work for selecting a good Pope.
I'll be the first to admit my understanding of catholic practice is not complete. Is the pope chosen directly by the cardinals or through every catholic church constituent voting? If it's the latter, then yes, that's definitely the way to do it, but if it isn't how should the people get the cardinals to do this?
Saving a religion by breaking its commandments sounds a lot like saving democracy by shutting down democratic processes. On the other hand, due to the unfathomable and ineffable nature of the divine, such actions could easily fall into the category of murders done in times of war/crusade.
In the end, I think maintaining a cohesive religion of that size without having that leeway to condone "inexcusable" actions is just as impossible as preventing 100% of the possible corruption of the organization. And honestly, I can't think of a more effective way of removing corruption within an organization.
Great and the current Pope is as uncatholic as you can get also. See how little it matters. Let's do the right thing instead of what some Pharisees say is "the real Catholicism".
It has become common discussion among Catholics how the Pope is failable, heresy is more tolerable than going along with Pope Francis' decrees. The next confrence will look hard at the rise of a call for tradition from global Catholics.
Lefties firebombed churches in Aus (specifically Victoria, as always) and Canada, too, to protest whatever bullshit cause du jour, from "sexual abuse" to the supposed "mass graves" in Canada that were conveniently never found...
And celebrities plus media figures justified and largely even glorified it, which tells you all you need to know, really, about where the West is headed...
The last time we saw large-scale public ransacking of churches? Mao's "Great Leap Forward". Which is also the main precedent for our trend of statue-toppling, which has also become ubiquitous across the West...
When they talk about sexual abuse, I always like to bring up that a man that molests boys is a homosexual.
The fucking shitfits libtards have is AMAZING. Even on the kia2 sub there was some gay guy who was supposedly one of us, but he told me that being a pedophile means homosexuality is just negated. The persona is a pedo, not gay anymore, even if they specifically target boys and boys only and their legal relationships are all homosexual.
I'm like Gandalf. Just randomly come out of the forest, leveled up. (Read: found a new job, much happier, financially better off, busy as fuck but whatever.)
This guy must be one of the greatest masterminds of the 21st century. Completely independently he infiltrated France, operated behind lines to discover vulnerabilities in security, got enough burnable material to create a massive fire, trained to breach patrols, transported all of his tools to the locations, and got away with hundreds of millions of damages undetected for years.
I don't care what you are, but if you're getting offended by me calling islamic terrorists "dipshits" and "lizards", then maybe you should go fix that about yourself.
But no pictures of the Muhamed that did it.
they only do that for synagogues
Or if perp's white.
How can we stop these Random Acts of Violence®? It's probably white supremacy that is causing it.
White supremacy is a solution to this situation.
If only there was some pattern we could use to lock people up forever (or deport them the hard way) before they destroyed the west.
If only
At least the Catholics aren't staying quiet entirely.
They need to get rid of their current pope. Jettison him into space and replace him with someone who isn't a weaselly globalist.
How do they keep the cardinals from picking another just like the last one though?
Simple. Ask the potential Pope what his stance is on Jews and then have him go public with his views on Jews. Only elect a Pope who is absolutely vicious on Jews, condemning them to hell as being a cursed race. Anyone nice to Jews, you don't elect.
I know, I know. This seems trivial or Nazi or whatever but trust me, it will 100% work for selecting a good Pope.
I'll be the first to admit my understanding of catholic practice is not complete. Is the pope chosen directly by the cardinals or through every catholic church constituent voting? If it's the latter, then yes, that's definitely the way to do it, but if it isn't how should the people get the cardinals to do this?
In older times the way the people got the Pope they wanted was through some unfortunate balcony accidents and cooking ingredient mix-ups.
I thought about it a while before responding.
Saving a religion by breaking its commandments sounds a lot like saving democracy by shutting down democratic processes. On the other hand, due to the unfathomable and ineffable nature of the divine, such actions could easily fall into the category of murders done in times of war/crusade.
In the end, I think maintaining a cohesive religion of that size without having that leeway to condone "inexcusable" actions is just as impossible as preventing 100% of the possible corruption of the organization. And honestly, I can't think of a more effective way of removing corruption within an organization.
To my knowledge, it's entirely the former, not the latter...
Hence the whole "secret meeting with coloured smoke to indicate choice" thing...
Jews being a 'cursed race' is as anti-Catholic an idea as you can get.
Great and the current Pope is as uncatholic as you can get also. See how little it matters. Let's do the right thing instead of what some Pharisees say is "the real Catholicism".
The difference is that he didn't get elected advertising his heresy.
Wait, what? You want to label the Savior of Catholics as part of a 'cursed race' and think they'll just go along with it?
If that's what you think Jews are to Catholics then yes the religion needs to be changed so that it becomes good.
It has become common discussion among Catholics how the Pope is failable, heresy is more tolerable than going along with Pope Francis' decrees. The next confrence will look hard at the rise of a call for tradition from global Catholics.
Need to declare 'wokeness' a heresy and start smiting/defrocking/excommunicating some clergy.
Obligatory reminder that when a modern lefty says "racist", they mean "White". So, guess what that means when they're posting about "anti-racism"?
Lefties firebombed churches in Aus (specifically Victoria, as always) and Canada, too, to protest whatever bullshit cause du jour, from "sexual abuse" to the supposed "mass graves" in Canada that were conveniently never found...
And celebrities plus media figures justified and largely even glorified it, which tells you all you need to know, really, about where the West is headed...
The last time we saw large-scale public ransacking of churches? Mao's "Great Leap Forward". Which is also the main precedent for our trend of statue-toppling, which has also become ubiquitous across the West...
Makes you think.
When they talk about sexual abuse, I always like to bring up that a man that molests boys is a homosexual.
The fucking shitfits libtards have is AMAZING. Even on the kia2 sub there was some gay guy who was supposedly one of us, but he told me that being a pedophile means homosexuality is just negated. The persona is a pedo, not gay anymore, even if they specifically target boys and boys only and their legal relationships are all homosexual.
Holy shit, you're alive! :o
I'm like Gandalf. Just randomly come out of the forest, leveled up. (Read: found a new job, much happier, financially better off, busy as fuck but whatever.)
This guy must be one of the greatest masterminds of the 21st century. Completely independently he infiltrated France, operated behind lines to discover vulnerabilities in security, got enough burnable material to create a massive fire, trained to breach patrols, transported all of his tools to the locations, and got away with hundreds of millions of damages undetected for years.
"Jesus Christ, it's Hussain Burn!"
burn him in front of the church
300 years ago he would have been tortured for hours before being burnt alive.
How ya doin rabbi?
Have you still not figured out that this guy isn't what he's pretending (badly) that he is?
It's possible, but I'd put more money on direct subversion rather than the second layer speculation.
If he's trying to subvert anything, it's pro-Israel and Jews. People imagine he's earnest because it suits them.
This is at the level of "HA HA, WE ARE JEWS AND WE ARE EVIL".
That he's a bad actor on this forum and an outsider?
That's without question.
Israel just likes bombing churches.
Reason #6000001 why we need a new crusade to reclaim the Holy Land for Christiandom.
Except it is already claimed by allies. So what needs is there for another crusade?
Those filthy heathens you call allies are merely temporary squatters.
Comment Removed: do not get baited
What's the matter, gopower2024? Struck a little close to the truth didn't I?
I'm not gopower.
Go power is very likely a NatSoc troll, so no.
I don't care what you are, but if you're getting offended by me calling islamic terrorists "dipshits" and "lizards", then maybe you should go fix that about yourself.
Comment Reported for: Troll user
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Glorification of violence
Do not advocate for the bombing of churches because a terrorist attacked a church.