5
exilde 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bitcoin is an idea. That idea is spawning technologies based on it. Those technologies have real value. The Bitcoin protocol itself seems too bloated to me to really do too much with, but it's a beautiful iteration of people having a financial incentive to act as a decentralized node of information exchange.

17
exilde 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yeah, but short term, we're probably going to see capital flight. Some of it will likely hit crypto.

Also, there's a real market for decentralized data right now. Something uncancellable. The different blockchain based technologies are starting to come into their own, and be able to accommodate that market.

Obvious bubble right now, but capital flight could pump it hard. It's also starting to gain fundamental value.

23
exilde 23 points ago +23 / -0

Wonder if crypto is gonna break out when this pimple pops.

14
exilde 14 points ago +14 / -0

Schlomo big mad.

24
exilde 24 points ago +24 / -0

According to leading Jewish scholars, the 11 million "people" figure is anti-semitic. It detracts from the significance of the 6 million Jews.

3
exilde 3 points ago +3 / -0

The faggotry is the trap, though.

18
exilde 18 points ago +18 / -0

Trump was a massive step in the right direction, even if he fell way short of the destination.

7
exilde 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because blackjack, and hookers.

4
exilde 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's no who. The most important thing is to remember the most corrosive elements of our old society, and those who propagate it, when we reconstitute our methods of government. This nation is likely to dissolve. I think it's prudent to consider the possibility.

12
exilde 12 points ago +12 / -0

The liberal view holds tightly to the Tabula Rasa myth, despite its self-evident falsehood. This auspice binds liberals to the left. Being clear in language helps cut through dogma.

14
exilde 14 points ago +14 / -0

Individuals meet standards, not races. It's just a matter of proportions.

7
exilde 7 points ago +7 / -0

I doubt it will get that bad, but if it does, dishonesty violates my deeply held beliefs.

8
exilde 8 points ago +8 / -0

Why? So we can spend our national treasure on the impossible task of trying to bring their demographic nightmare into line? I'd rather just cut off the gangrenous parts. With a higher quality population, we can have greater liberty.

12
exilde 12 points ago +12 / -0

Well, Britain gave material naval aid so that southern cotton could make it to their ports, often to be sold back to the union for extreme profit. Kinda like how US Jews sold guns from union factories to the south in exchange for black market cotton. I don't think cotton production really shifted significantly through the war.

32
exilde 32 points ago +32 / -0

The division is firmly set. We're only accelerating the separation now. Hopefully we can find something we can mutually agree on, and both fuck off to our own devices.

1
exilde 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's the point of electors with such a small userbase? Representation isn't really necessary until it becomes impractical for individual voters to have their say, and it just encourages cliquism.

We should have a supreme decider, who all are free to petition with their points. This person should not be an idiot, so the masses should have little say in their appointment. I suggest electors.

13
exilde 13 points ago +13 / -0

User friendliness was the real culprit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›