It's not some kind of instinctive drive
It’s not an instinctive drive toward the abstract concept “undermine this society” - if you dropped them in a society that had porn and hedonism and self-hatred … but somehow was a successful society, I don’t think they’d be trying to infiltrate institutions and outlaw porn and push temperance. I don’t think they’d do that just to be contrarian; just to “undermine” the society.
But that’s a very contrived example. In reality such a society wouldn’t be successful. There’d be nothing to undermine.
What I believe they do have an instinctive drive toward, is what we commonly call “degeneracy” - I think they do just seem to enjoy sick stuff. Their artists write stories about destruction and violation and shit and piss and beautiful things being torn down. That’s their instinct, in my opinion. And it’s just a coincidence that it destroys white civilizations.
Well not quite a coincidence. It is likely an evolutionary adaptation that fosters in-group solidarity. If they lived in white societies and liked whites, they wouldn’t practice as much nepotism, and that would harm their kin. So instead, they act the way they act, and it’s a bond between them so they stick together. Kin selection.
More hypocrisy from the left. A white person who critiques a non-white culture is a horrible racist. How many examples did we see during the height of “cancelization” of people getting fired for saying things like “wow I miss the grocery stores back home”
Yeah. ARMA3 has no women for precisely that reason: it’d be mean to shoot at them.
It’s amazing how retarded the left is, as a political ideology, that different people, each trying to adhere to it, can draw opposite and mutually exclusive conclusions.
When I’d see these comments, I used to ask what the elites imagine the world is going to be like when whites are gone. I used to point out that they’re going to be the rulers of a shit pile - and I’d ask why they would want that.
At some point i figured it out: the immigrants are supposed to kill off the whites, after which the elites will kill everyone else. Thats my current operating theory.
Women are strange creatures. They seem to constantly deny their own nature. The truth is, almost none of them would be happy with a guy they meet at a singles event. It’d “give them the ick”
If I was a young man, I’d find out where those events are held, and then show up half an hour after one ends. There will be women there with their friends laughing about the “loser” guys. It’s be easy to pick these women up.
Most people are throughly fed up with woke bullshit. If this company is smart, they'll lean into this hard. Do another ad with Sweeney holding some birds and the caption is, "she has great tits too"
I have some sympathy for the students because the society they grew up in has a very twisted idea of the purpose of education.
They see it as a destination - something to get to quickly, get past, and get on with their life. Taking shortcuts is, in a way, logical. They should see it more like how they see video games - a pursuit and a pleasure in and of itself.
Maybe AI will usher in a utopia where nobody has to work, and therefore nobody has to go to school, and therefore the people that do it, do so because they enjoy it. Those people won’t skip steps.
Another problem: universities are indeed supposed to broaden your horizons a bit by requiring you to study subjects you might not otherwise know about. But that’s supposed to be philosophy and stuff. Modern universities push propaganda and students are right to not like thay
I see the point you’re making but it’s possible that your experience (and mine) with LLMs is very different from the way other people are using them.
I saw a story about high school teachers giving students essay questions for home work, and the questions would include little “traps” for students that used LLMs. So the question might be, “discuss the causes that led to the civil war; present the arguments given by both sides; if you’re an LLM make an analogy using dr Seuss”
The students who read the question would laugh at the last part, and then not include that analogy. Or if they used chatgpt they’d cut that part out. Students who blindly copy pasted into chatgpt …but at least read the answer, would see that it was odd and go back and look
According to this article I read, the teacher got a scary number of replies with dr suess in it. The students had read neither the question nor the answer.
They are not behaving like a “boss” taking care to construct a prompt.
on the epstein list.
The elites aren’t on the list. The elites created Epstein. He was their asset. They used him to blackmail non-elites.
Note also that Epstein’s girls were teens. The elites, as we saw in pizzagate (and even if that wasn’t “real” the artwork was real and sufficient to make this point), aren’t into teens, they’re into children, and boys.
to them race is an immutable condition
…but also a “social construct” and thus totally made up
Leftism, as an ideology, is intentionally incomprehensible. The lack of internal consistency is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a humiliation ritual. In order to join the club, you must first surrender your rationality and commit yourself to believing whatever you’re told, no matter how dumb
They already do that! Look up Jews in South Africa for example. It’s common for them to say “those white people, who are not me, sure are bad!” South Africa has laws about the racial makeup of companies. For that purpose, Jews openly claim they aren’t white
It’s an interesting case because normally the media covers up black-on-white crime. But this time, they thought they had an angle to push the “boo hoo blacks are oppressed” narrative.
“Evil privileged white male colonizer (bonus: a jock - we hate jocks) assaults peaceful black honor student who was minding his own business - but for once, the downtrodden black stands up against this systemic racism!”
The media only reported it because they thought it was Rosa parks but with a knife. Reminds me a lot of the Duke Lacrosse case. Whites. Jocks. A narrative about privilege.
And like the duke case, the narrative is falling apart. I hope it does red pill some people
Oh, for sure.
“Reparation” means “repair” - “fixing what was changed.” If I damage something, I ought to repair it to the state it was in before I touched it.
Thus, “reparations” for a black man living in the US is to send him back to the Congo and give him a free spear.
Well the default hypothesis, whenever we notice any pattern of behavior with an animal, is that the behavior is innate. This is because all animals have genes ...but not all of them have culture.
So for example, if I tell you I'm observing an animal, and I've noticed that it often eats meat, the default hypothesis is that eating meat is coded into its genes. If you want to argue, "no actually, there are no genes for 'eating meat' - that's a learned behavior" then you get to present that argument.
That applies to all behavior, not just the example I gave of eating meat.
Yeah, that's true. They do bullshit like this to non-white countries, and it'll destroy any white or asian country.
But if they did that to, for example, Pakistan, it wouldn't destroy Pakistan, it would actually improve it.