It's the double standards that get me every time. The fact that one thing is said, another thing is done, and we're all just supposed to pretend that nothing is wrong with this.
Living life based around religious and tribal nonsense is how we got into this mess, and why the goat fuckers in the sandbox remain the way they are.
Maybe instead of asking "what would magic sky king tell me to do?", ask " what would a good and moral man tell himself to do?", and live life around that.
Anyway, that's why the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, and while we may be lacking in the former, we sure do have a surplus of the latter...
If that's all you can comprehend from what I wrote, it's eminently absurd for you to call someone else a midwit.
Look, here's the simple deal. You don't want others to say something about your religion? Stop bringing it up in unrelated conversations.
Super quick and easy way to avoid having you jimmies rustled.
Otherwise, you're gonna have to deal with the fact that some people aren't in your cult, or heaven forfend, in any fucking cult, and aren't shy about letting you know that.
Or, since I get the impression you have a brick in place of a brain and need a tl;dr, if you don't insert "but muh jesus..." into random unrelated stuff, I won't say "fuck off with your jesus".
ask " what would a good and moral man tell himself to do?"
Ok, and how do you define what's moral or not, if there's no absolutely morality laying above humans, anyway?
Because according to those pedos, what they're doing is perfectly moral, hence why they keep doing it. Meanwhile, trying to stop them would, thus, be considered immoral.
Ok, and how do you define what's moral or not, if there's no absolutely morality laying above humans, anyway?
Arbitrarily, the same way we define anything that doesn't have a basis in physical reality. We decide it for ourselves, agree to a society-wide agreeable standard, and go with that.
We don't need to make up a magic sky king to enforce these things on us. People were good and decent before the jesus cult, and they'll figure out how to be good and decent long after it's died out.
Because according to those pedos, what they're doing is perfectly moral, hence why they keep doing it. Meanwhile, trying to stop them would, thus, be considered immoral.
The fact that morals are relative doesn't stop you from making judgements or enforcing your own morals. It doesn't matter if they think it's moral if you do not; you can still judge them as a person. You simply want the comforting blanket of a pocket-nuke equivalent that you can point to as your biggest stick when your foes refuse your demands. That's always what religion was: the absolute authority that people were told to follow else they face absolute destruction and eternal punishment.
You don't need religion to have morality. You simply use religion to enforce a moral system.
We decide it for ourselves, agree to a society-wide agreeable standard, and go with that.
Yeah, that worked great for all those societies in human history. Like the one who performed human sacrifices, even children, muslim countries were women are basically objects, communism where they can kill or enslave any citizen they want, dictatorships like North Korea or extreme Authoritarianism like China where there's no private life and people can boarded up in their own homes...
Look at the most civilised countries in the world, by "coincidence", they are almost all funded on Christians beliefs.
People were good and decent before the jesus cult
Even heard of the Old Testament? The part that's the majority of the Bible?
Plenty of laws were written in it, while all their neighbours had instead terrible laws and morals.
The fact that morals are relative doesn't stop you from making judgements or enforcing your own morals.
If it's your "own moral" and nothing else, then it doesn't matter. What matters is the moral the society you live in use. If you don't believe abortions is moral, yet the entire society thinks so, do you think "Judging them" is going to change anything at all?
Meanwhile, they can think that killing you is moral because you don't agree with their points and you're a danger to society (exactly what the modern Left is doing right now).
Yeah, that worked great for all those societies in human history. Like the one who performed human sacrifices, even children, muslim countries were women are basically objects, communism where they can kill or enslave any citizen they want, dictatorships like North Korea or extreme Authoritarianism like China where there's no private life and people can boarded up in their own homes...
Look at the most civilised countries in the world, by "coincidence", they are almost all funded on Christians beliefs.
No, no, please, continue cherry picking examples. We don't need to discuss extreme christian examples like inquisition-era Spain, or any part of the Byzantine empire, nor do we need to discuss any abuses done by the christian or catholic church. It was always exactly perfect in your specific examples, and certainly perfect elsewhere. And we certainly don't need to discuss successful and prosperous civilizations like ancient china, or greece, or rome, or any of a bunch of other non-christian nations. They never existed, since we've not chosen them while cherry picking.
Also, it's rich to try to tar the mohammedians with a "children and women are objects, not people" when the exact same requirements appear in christian, catholic, and jewish traditions as well. Almost like there was a common ancestor religion that had a bunch of breakaways...
But never mind that. As we know, jesus people good, mohammed people bad.
Even heard of the Old Testament? The part that's the majority of the Bible?
Plenty of laws were written in it, while all their neighbours had instead terrible laws and morals.
Something something Code of Hammurabi something something oldest known legal codex with moral prescriptions something something basis for a lot of classic legal systems.
And, again, we'll skip over inconvenient places like the mediterranean, where people made perfectly functional laws and societies while worshipping a completely different set of magic sky kings, and oddly enough seemed to prosper.
If it's your "own moral" and nothing else, then it doesn't matter. What matters is the moral the society you live in use. If you don't believe abortions is moral, yet the entire society thinks so, do you think "Judging them" is going to change anything at all?
Meanwhile, they can think that killing you is moral because you don't agree with their points and you're a danger to society (exactly what the modern Left is doing right now).
At the risk of being accused of fedposting, judging people for their actions does plenty if and when you act in it. If you just retreat to your jesus safety blanket and say "my god calls that a sin! You are the bad people!", well, all you've done is bloviated and patted yourself on the back while, in your estimation, innocent babies were being murdered.
What was that old quote, that all it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing, or something to that effect? That's you, the good man doing less then nothing, because you have a religion to hide inside to support your moral code.
And as for my enemies, they can think killing me is moral all day, until they begin to act on it. At which point I will judge them with my morals, and my morals are cast in steel and etched in brass. Again, at the risk of being called an internet tough guy or a glowie, I don't need anyone's god to tell me what is right or wrong, and I don't need anyone's church to serve as the impetus for my actions.
Why do you? Am I somehow that much better than you? I don't believe so; I like to imagine we're fairly comparable as individuals. Surely we can both stand out in the cold and do the hard tasks that need to be done, without the need for a safety blanket drsped over our backs and clasped around our throats.
The elites aren’t on the list. The elites created Epstein. He was their asset. They used him to blackmail non-elites.
Note also that Epstein’s girls were teens. The elites, as we saw in pizzagate (and even if that wasn’t “real” the artwork was real and sufficient to make this point), aren’t into teens, they’re into children, and boys.
It's the double standards that get me every time. The fact that one thing is said, another thing is done, and we're all just supposed to pretend that nothing is wrong with this.
Im willing to bet the ceo of mastercard ans visa and all those major payment processors are pedos and are on the epstein list.
Why the hell do we have pedos telling us what is right or wrong?
Jesus warned us all about this, but somehow people mentally block out his words when it comes to the tribe.
Living life based around religious and tribal nonsense is how we got into this mess, and why the goat fuckers in the sandbox remain the way they are.
Maybe instead of asking "what would magic sky king tell me to do?", ask " what would a good and moral man tell himself to do?", and live life around that.
Anyway, that's why the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, and while we may be lacking in the former, we sure do have a surplus of the latter...
Go back to Reddit, midwit.
If that's all you can comprehend from what I wrote, it's eminently absurd for you to call someone else a midwit.
Look, here's the simple deal. You don't want others to say something about your religion? Stop bringing it up in unrelated conversations.
Super quick and easy way to avoid having you jimmies rustled.
Otherwise, you're gonna have to deal with the fact that some people aren't in your cult, or heaven forfend, in any fucking cult, and aren't shy about letting you know that.
Or, since I get the impression you have a brick in place of a brain and need a tl;dr, if you don't insert "but muh jesus..." into random unrelated stuff, I won't say "fuck off with your jesus".
Ok, and how do you define what's moral or not, if there's no absolutely morality laying above humans, anyway?
Because according to those pedos, what they're doing is perfectly moral, hence why they keep doing it. Meanwhile, trying to stop them would, thus, be considered immoral.
Arbitrarily, the same way we define anything that doesn't have a basis in physical reality. We decide it for ourselves, agree to a society-wide agreeable standard, and go with that.
We don't need to make up a magic sky king to enforce these things on us. People were good and decent before the jesus cult, and they'll figure out how to be good and decent long after it's died out.
The fact that morals are relative doesn't stop you from making judgements or enforcing your own morals. It doesn't matter if they think it's moral if you do not; you can still judge them as a person. You simply want the comforting blanket of a pocket-nuke equivalent that you can point to as your biggest stick when your foes refuse your demands. That's always what religion was: the absolute authority that people were told to follow else they face absolute destruction and eternal punishment.
You don't need religion to have morality. You simply use religion to enforce a moral system.
Yeah, that worked great for all those societies in human history. Like the one who performed human sacrifices, even children, muslim countries were women are basically objects, communism where they can kill or enslave any citizen they want, dictatorships like North Korea or extreme Authoritarianism like China where there's no private life and people can boarded up in their own homes...
Look at the most civilised countries in the world, by "coincidence", they are almost all funded on Christians beliefs.
Even heard of the Old Testament? The part that's the majority of the Bible?
Plenty of laws were written in it, while all their neighbours had instead terrible laws and morals.
If it's your "own moral" and nothing else, then it doesn't matter. What matters is the moral the society you live in use. If you don't believe abortions is moral, yet the entire society thinks so, do you think "Judging them" is going to change anything at all?
Meanwhile, they can think that killing you is moral because you don't agree with their points and you're a danger to society (exactly what the modern Left is doing right now).
No, no, please, continue cherry picking examples. We don't need to discuss extreme christian examples like inquisition-era Spain, or any part of the Byzantine empire, nor do we need to discuss any abuses done by the christian or catholic church. It was always exactly perfect in your specific examples, and certainly perfect elsewhere. And we certainly don't need to discuss successful and prosperous civilizations like ancient china, or greece, or rome, or any of a bunch of other non-christian nations. They never existed, since we've not chosen them while cherry picking.
Also, it's rich to try to tar the mohammedians with a "children and women are objects, not people" when the exact same requirements appear in christian, catholic, and jewish traditions as well. Almost like there was a common ancestor religion that had a bunch of breakaways...
But never mind that. As we know, jesus people good, mohammed people bad.
Something something Code of Hammurabi something something oldest known legal codex with moral prescriptions something something basis for a lot of classic legal systems.
And, again, we'll skip over inconvenient places like the mediterranean, where people made perfectly functional laws and societies while worshipping a completely different set of magic sky kings, and oddly enough seemed to prosper.
At the risk of being accused of fedposting, judging people for their actions does plenty if and when you act in it. If you just retreat to your jesus safety blanket and say "my god calls that a sin! You are the bad people!", well, all you've done is bloviated and patted yourself on the back while, in your estimation, innocent babies were being murdered.
What was that old quote, that all it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing, or something to that effect? That's you, the good man doing less then nothing, because you have a religion to hide inside to support your moral code.
And as for my enemies, they can think killing me is moral all day, until they begin to act on it. At which point I will judge them with my morals, and my morals are cast in steel and etched in brass. Again, at the risk of being called an internet tough guy or a glowie, I don't need anyone's god to tell me what is right or wrong, and I don't need anyone's church to serve as the impetus for my actions.
Why do you? Am I somehow that much better than you? I don't believe so; I like to imagine we're fairly comparable as individuals. Surely we can both stand out in the cold and do the hard tasks that need to be done, without the need for a safety blanket drsped over our backs and clasped around our throats.
The elites aren’t on the list. The elites created Epstein. He was their asset. They used him to blackmail non-elites.
Note also that Epstein’s girls were teens. The elites, as we saw in pizzagate (and even if that wasn’t “real” the artwork was real and sufficient to make this point), aren’t into teens, they’re into children, and boys.
So all the games featuring bear rape scenes will be removed?
Depends on the bear.
I presume the ones women fantasize about stay up.
Goddamn I hate troons.
like a very wise man turned broke ass cuck once said “Either all of them are okay, or none of them are.”
They need to be held up to their own standards, difficulty: impossible
The new "it's not rape when a Muslim does it".
It’s because it’s violence on men. That’s fine.
A game called YMKET: Strade just released this week that is straight up gay snuff.
i remember this shit well, it was one of the first big exceptions to the "no porn" rule on steam.