Living life based around religious and tribal nonsense is how we got into this mess, and why the goat fuckers in the sandbox remain the way they are.
Maybe instead of asking "what would magic sky king tell me to do?", ask " what would a good and moral man tell himself to do?", and live life around that.
Anyway, that's why the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, and while we may be lacking in the former, we sure do have a surplus of the latter...
If that's all you can comprehend from what I wrote, it's eminently absurd for you to call someone else a midwit.
Look, here's the simple deal. You don't want others to say something about your religion? Stop bringing it up in unrelated conversations.
Super quick and easy way to avoid having you jimmies rustled.
Otherwise, you're gonna have to deal with the fact that some people aren't in your cult, or heaven forfend, in any fucking cult, and aren't shy about letting you know that.
Or, since I get the impression you have a brick in place of a brain and need a tl;dr, if you don't insert "but muh jesus..." into random unrelated stuff, I won't say "fuck off with your jesus".
ask " what would a good and moral man tell himself to do?"
Ok, and how do you define what's moral or not, if there's no absolutely morality laying above humans, anyway?
Because according to those pedos, what they're doing is perfectly moral, hence why they keep doing it. Meanwhile, trying to stop them would, thus, be considered immoral.
Ok, and how do you define what's moral or not, if there's no absolutely morality laying above humans, anyway?
Arbitrarily, the same way we define anything that doesn't have a basis in physical reality. We decide it for ourselves, agree to a society-wide agreeable standard, and go with that.
We don't need to make up a magic sky king to enforce these things on us. People were good and decent before the jesus cult, and they'll figure out how to be good and decent long after it's died out.
Because according to those pedos, what they're doing is perfectly moral, hence why they keep doing it. Meanwhile, trying to stop them would, thus, be considered immoral.
The fact that morals are relative doesn't stop you from making judgements or enforcing your own morals. It doesn't matter if they think it's moral if you do not; you can still judge them as a person. You simply want the comforting blanket of a pocket-nuke equivalent that you can point to as your biggest stick when your foes refuse your demands. That's always what religion was: the absolute authority that people were told to follow else they face absolute destruction and eternal punishment.
You don't need religion to have morality. You simply use religion to enforce a moral system.
We decide it for ourselves, agree to a society-wide agreeable standard, and go with that.
Yeah, that worked great for all those societies in human history. Like the one who performed human sacrifices, even children, muslim countries were women are basically objects, communism where they can kill or enslave any citizen they want, dictatorships like North Korea or extreme Authoritarianism like China where there's no private life and people can boarded up in their own homes...
Look at the most civilised countries in the world, by "coincidence", they are almost all funded on Christians beliefs.
People were good and decent before the jesus cult
Even heard of the Old Testament? The part that's the majority of the Bible?
Plenty of laws were written in it, while all their neighbours had instead terrible laws and morals.
The fact that morals are relative doesn't stop you from making judgements or enforcing your own morals.
If it's your "own moral" and nothing else, then it doesn't matter. What matters is the moral the society you live in use. If you don't believe abortions is moral, yet the entire society thinks so, do you think "Judging them" is going to change anything at all?
Meanwhile, they can think that killing you is moral because you don't agree with their points and you're a danger to society (exactly what the modern Left is doing right now).
Jesus warned us all about this, but somehow people mentally block out his words when it comes to the tribe.
Living life based around religious and tribal nonsense is how we got into this mess, and why the goat fuckers in the sandbox remain the way they are.
Maybe instead of asking "what would magic sky king tell me to do?", ask " what would a good and moral man tell himself to do?", and live life around that.
Anyway, that's why the tree of liberty needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants, and while we may be lacking in the former, we sure do have a surplus of the latter...
Go back to Reddit, midwit.
If that's all you can comprehend from what I wrote, it's eminently absurd for you to call someone else a midwit.
Look, here's the simple deal. You don't want others to say something about your religion? Stop bringing it up in unrelated conversations.
Super quick and easy way to avoid having you jimmies rustled.
Otherwise, you're gonna have to deal with the fact that some people aren't in your cult, or heaven forfend, in any fucking cult, and aren't shy about letting you know that.
Or, since I get the impression you have a brick in place of a brain and need a tl;dr, if you don't insert "but muh jesus..." into random unrelated stuff, I won't say "fuck off with your jesus".
Ok, and how do you define what's moral or not, if there's no absolutely morality laying above humans, anyway?
Because according to those pedos, what they're doing is perfectly moral, hence why they keep doing it. Meanwhile, trying to stop them would, thus, be considered immoral.
Arbitrarily, the same way we define anything that doesn't have a basis in physical reality. We decide it for ourselves, agree to a society-wide agreeable standard, and go with that.
We don't need to make up a magic sky king to enforce these things on us. People were good and decent before the jesus cult, and they'll figure out how to be good and decent long after it's died out.
The fact that morals are relative doesn't stop you from making judgements or enforcing your own morals. It doesn't matter if they think it's moral if you do not; you can still judge them as a person. You simply want the comforting blanket of a pocket-nuke equivalent that you can point to as your biggest stick when your foes refuse your demands. That's always what religion was: the absolute authority that people were told to follow else they face absolute destruction and eternal punishment.
You don't need religion to have morality. You simply use religion to enforce a moral system.
Yeah, that worked great for all those societies in human history. Like the one who performed human sacrifices, even children, muslim countries were women are basically objects, communism where they can kill or enslave any citizen they want, dictatorships like North Korea or extreme Authoritarianism like China where there's no private life and people can boarded up in their own homes...
Look at the most civilised countries in the world, by "coincidence", they are almost all funded on Christians beliefs.
Even heard of the Old Testament? The part that's the majority of the Bible?
Plenty of laws were written in it, while all their neighbours had instead terrible laws and morals.
If it's your "own moral" and nothing else, then it doesn't matter. What matters is the moral the society you live in use. If you don't believe abortions is moral, yet the entire society thinks so, do you think "Judging them" is going to change anything at all?
Meanwhile, they can think that killing you is moral because you don't agree with their points and you're a danger to society (exactly what the modern Left is doing right now).