Depressing how accurate this is
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
You have this backwards. It's their ideology that teaches them to do that. It's not some kind of instinctive drive. There are more than enough individual "jews" like Dave Smith who prove that.
And before you say he's in the minority, people who resist and think for themselves are ALWAYS in the minority. Most people are pathetic sheep in all societies and cultures.
It’s not an instinctive drive toward the abstract concept “undermine this society” - if you dropped them in a society that had porn and hedonism and self-hatred … but somehow was a successful society, I don’t think they’d be trying to infiltrate institutions and outlaw porn and push temperance. I don’t think they’d do that just to be contrarian; just to “undermine” the society.
But that’s a very contrived example. In reality such a society wouldn’t be successful. There’d be nothing to undermine.
What I believe they do have an instinctive drive toward, is what we commonly call “degeneracy” - I think they do just seem to enjoy sick stuff. Their artists write stories about destruction and violation and shit and piss and beautiful things being torn down. That’s their instinct, in my opinion. And it’s just a coincidence that it destroys white civilizations.
Well not quite a coincidence. It is likely an evolutionary adaptation that fosters in-group solidarity. If they lived in white societies and liked whites, they wouldn’t practice as much nepotism, and that would harm their kin. So instead, they act the way they act, and it’s a bond between them so they stick together. Kin selection.
That's called a pattern, but you haven't said anything other than your opinion about why it's innate rather than learned.
You're also completely wrong about it destroying only "white" societies. How many times have they been kicked out? Like 200+?
Well the default hypothesis, whenever we notice any pattern of behavior with an animal, is that the behavior is innate. This is because all animals have genes ...but not all of them have culture.
So for example, if I tell you I'm observing an animal, and I've noticed that it often eats meat, the default hypothesis is that eating meat is coded into its genes. If you want to argue, "no actually, there are no genes for 'eating meat' - that's a learned behavior" then you get to present that argument.
That applies to all behavior, not just the example I gave of eating meat.
Yeah, that's true. They do bullshit like this to non-white countries, and it'll destroy any white or asian country.
But if they did that to, for example, Pakistan, it wouldn't destroy Pakistan, it would actually improve it.