Depressing how accurate this is
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
We need goblin coders because elves and humans are too lazy and expensive!
They want foreign coders because these tech companies can literally enslave them. Immigrants have to become slaves of their employers otherwise they can be deported. They can't just quit and find a better job. They are dependent on their employer sponsoring them in order for them to legally move to the USA. Nobody is really benefiting from this except the people who want slaves. The West is still operating under a slavery system like during the early 1800s except now it's done via the 13th amendment(in the USA) and immigration. The ruling class of the West just wants a society that is just them, slaves and A.I. Of course, eventually these immigrants will acquire their freedom but for X amount of years, they have to be a slave. But then these employers can just import new slaves to replace the ones who gain their freedom.
They just migrate to another host, the west is just theor latest puppet empire,before it they used the Ottomans, Persia, Rome, Babylon.
They are international criminals, not some black squatting in a ghetto.
There are not many "good" hosts left. Everything is in decline. It's indianization-niggerfication-chinkzation of the whole world.
My son won't see if fulfilled, but my grandchildren (if we get there) willl
They can make the host, Americans live in a bubble and are largely ignaroant of nations and cultures outside of the anglosphere.
Argentina, El Salvador, China, Russia, Saudia(royal family are crypto jews) are all good candidates.
Argentina would be my best bet, Japan second, but there's not a lot outside these two, if El Salvador gets better in the next 5 years, also good option
I sincerely doubt they'll ever find another host people as domesticated and subservient to them as the Corporate Globohomo States of America.
You can jew all the people for some time, and you can jew some people all the time, but you can't jew all people all the time.
Honestly it's only to be expected. They're taught from birth that they are the chosen people, better than everybody else in a world populated by idiots misled by false prophets. Except it's worse than that, rabbis teach the goyim are literally subhuman with the souls of animals. So the entire jewish view of outsiders is colored by hatred and contempt and that enormous victim complex. Then you get vicious details like... well, the word fraier. It doesn't just mean 'sucker' or 'mark' but somebody that refuses to cut corners to get ahead. If my gentile neighbor leaves his car window down and his wallet is sitting right there on the dash - I am a fraier if I don't steal it, and this is one of the worst insults in their language.
I'm convinced there's no bargaining with them in good faith, there is no cooperation possible. Nothing's left but to expel them en masse. 109 nations figured this out, so far.
110
For the types that preach this cultural destruction, if civilization implodes on itself and causes half of their people to be killed or expelled in retaliation, they are happy because its another shoah or holocaust or victory arch their grandchildren can give the finger to and look back on for hundreds of years and claim ultimate victim points.
You have this backwards. It's their ideology that teaches them to do that. It's not some kind of instinctive drive. There are more than enough individual "jews" like Dave Smith who prove that.
And before you say he's in the minority, people who resist and think for themselves are ALWAYS in the minority. Most people are pathetic sheep in all societies and cultures.
It’s not an instinctive drive toward the abstract concept “undermine this society” - if you dropped them in a society that had porn and hedonism and self-hatred … but somehow was a successful society, I don’t think they’d be trying to infiltrate institutions and outlaw porn and push temperance. I don’t think they’d do that just to be contrarian; just to “undermine” the society.
But that’s a very contrived example. In reality such a society wouldn’t be successful. There’d be nothing to undermine.
What I believe they do have an instinctive drive toward, is what we commonly call “degeneracy” - I think they do just seem to enjoy sick stuff. Their artists write stories about destruction and violation and shit and piss and beautiful things being torn down. That’s their instinct, in my opinion. And it’s just a coincidence that it destroys white civilizations.
Well not quite a coincidence. It is likely an evolutionary adaptation that fosters in-group solidarity. If they lived in white societies and liked whites, they wouldn’t practice as much nepotism, and that would harm their kin. So instead, they act the way they act, and it’s a bond between them so they stick together. Kin selection.
That's called a pattern, but you haven't said anything other than your opinion about why it's innate rather than learned.
You're also completely wrong about it destroying only "white" societies. How many times have they been kicked out? Like 200+?
Well the default hypothesis, whenever we notice any pattern of behavior with an animal, is that the behavior is innate. This is because all animals have genes ...but not all of them have culture.
So for example, if I tell you I'm observing an animal, and I've noticed that it often eats meat, the default hypothesis is that eating meat is coded into its genes. If you want to argue, "no actually, there are no genes for 'eating meat' - that's a learned behavior" then you get to present that argument.
That applies to all behavior, not just the example I gave of eating meat.
Yeah, that's true. They do bullshit like this to non-white countries, and it'll destroy any white or asian country.
But if they did that to, for example, Pakistan, it wouldn't destroy Pakistan, it would actually improve it.
They're human beings, not mere animals. All human beings are a mix of nature and nurture, so your assertion is just false.
Moreover, if you see a cat barking like a dog, the logical assumption is that it was raised with dogs and not that it has barking genetics.
As for what would improve Pakistan, I doubt anything that the Zionists would do to undermine it would have any improvements. Even if they did support importing Japanese people, it would be exclusively criminals or something.
This is the logical fallacy known as “special pleading.” My assertion is true. The default assumption is nature. It’s totally fine if you want to present an argument that a particular behavior is nurture, but that ball is in your court.
That’s logical … but notice, that cat is breaking the pattern - it’s an exception
Above, we were talking about patterns. And now you’re raising an exception.
Furthermore, when you find a cat barking you should not merely assert that it must be nurture. What you should do is start with the assumption that it’s nature, and then disprove that by, for example, finding out if the behavior is only exhibited by cats raised by dogs.
My position here is logical and has survived several challenges. I hope you can admit that.
We agree that Jews (indeed, all races) have certain behavioral tendencies. The default explanation is their relatedness to each other (genes/nature). If you believe otherwise that’s totally fine. But you need to present an argument (show that some of them are raised by dogs who bark, and that the behavior only manifests in those).
If you make another reply where, instead of presenting such an argument, you continue to claim that my position (that nature is the default explanation) is not true (and that therefore you are allowed to assert that the explanation is nurture without an accompanying argument) then I’ll have to assume you have no such argument
https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography
They know. It’s a careful calculus for them at all times.
The real question is why do we tolerate the wildly disproportionate influence of a hostile foreign demographic who are openly subverting us “just the right amount”? Imagine putting up with a chef who only poisons you just enough not to trigger your awareness of it.
yeah.. the recent things trump is doing, especially since doing 180 on epstein, seems to be on making sure small hats arent offended... like wtf?
the only light skin trump is protecting from "discrmination" are tiny hats (even though they are like in half the CEO and admin positions) and already have plenty of protections.. shit.. anti-semitism is already a special category for "hate"
Rule 16: Oy vey! Shut it down!
Did Trump say ANYTHING about his priority being protecting Israel from criticism before he was inaugurated?
He did, but the headline was coded. It read: Trump accepts $100 million from dual citizen Miriam Adelson.
Yeah, they are only deporting a small percentage of immigrants. The Republicans aren't anti mass immigration and will never be anti mass immigration. The only difference between them and the Democrats when it comes to immigration is Democrats think immigrants who are hardcore criminals should be allowed to enter and stay. That's it. So Americans should expect millions of more people entering their country on a regular basis. They just wont be criminals but instead, they will be dirt cheap wage slaves. In fact, I can't think of any political party in the West that is anti mass immigration. And the problem is not really immigrants who are criminals. The problem is mass immigration. Millions of law abiding people entering a nation can cause more problems for the natives than a handful of criminals.
Sinfest.xyz has been on point for the last several months.
His two advisors just finished wringing their hands.