We are OK with paying women more than men for doing less purely based on them being women. Why the uproar here?
Maria has a PhD in Cancer Biology. She could have just said feminism.
Must be because of patriarchy / capitalism / climate change.
In the war between TERFs and TRAs, I actually support TRAs (other than the kids stuff). TRAs' agitation for gender neutral everything is doing more for equality than decades of MRA efforts.
For example by making it easier to change your gender to F (without surgery or chemical castration) it finally allows men to bypass unfair laws in employment, education and funding. What MRA actions in 30 years comes even close to that?
We will never get rid of feminism because women love it. However, we can at least get closer to equality so the impact of feminism on men is lessened.
Isn't she one of the main influencers for Anita S?
According to Terfs this phenomena is because males have a fetish to be women. So many men want to be women. This must be a really popular fetish.
Feminists like JK refuse to acknowledge that they caused these problems. Serves them right.
I would love it if then is used against women protesting against TRA invasion. Serves them right.
Hurray for cost overruns. Remaining competant male workers should be charging a fortune forvtheir services.
We have accepted this kind of rationale in our society for over 100 years. Sexism is power plus prejudice therefore you can't be sexist against men.
Just redefine the problem and the problem goes away. Can't use experimental drugs on humans? No problems just don't call it experimental.
What if the demoralisation already happened through previous coercion? It takes a special kind of mental gymnastics to keep saying that women are oppressed and men are oppressors in the face of reality.
It just paves the way for the new set of insanity. I for one don't think it's worth fighting it. If they want to say women can be men then so be it. Let them experience the male privilege as they believe men have.
The real WTF is how surprised everyone is at this. The feminist denigration of men of science inevitably introduced "other ways of knowing" that is more inclusive of feminine intuitive knowledge. Hence you have the intrusion of feminist biology, feminist glaciology etc.
Once you have corrupted the scientific method with emotive, feminist crap, it's only a matter of time before other intersectional aspect crept in. I mean the HAES movement has been gaining traction for years.
Creationists take note. This is how you get your religion to be taught as scientific fact.
I believe what the article is trying to say is the inflation will make cash savings worthless. Which is true.
What is should be saying is that Let's go Brandon's policies are making inflation go hyper so cash savings are worthless.
What it ends up saying is that people should spend money to help big corporations and also end up making inflation hyper.
In conclusion, cash savings are worthless.. unless it's in crypto.
The problem with white men is not realising their greatest enemy is not Indians. The situation described in the OP is only a side effect of a greater social problem.
White men's greatest enemy is white women.
I think this is a good thing. Trans as a protected class is the only way to equality for men since conversavtives have utterly caved to the feminist religion.
All feminists (JK Rowling is a rabid one) deserve what they're getting. They promoted a society where immutable features are valued over content of character. That's why in the war between TERFs and TRAs, I fully support TRAs. It's about time feminists get a taste of their own medicine.
How long will Asians continue to vote Democrats?
It should be the opposite. Estrogen AND testoterone should be legal to anyone who wants it. At the moment only estrogen is freely available. Why isn't testoterone freely available?
They are also a gender and a race and a sexual preference and a diet and a disability ...
I mean, we can accept feminist rhetoric like "men are oppressors and women are oppressed" to justify special rights for women. We completely cancel and ignore the truth whenever it is presented. It's not that far fetched that lying about other things would get people to vote against their self interest.
Here is an intro to the climate fraud. https://wattsupwiththat.com/climategate/
That is assuming your curiosity is genuine.
The entire basis for TERFs hating on TRAs lies in their hatred of men. Fuck that cancerous shite.
Not once did she talk about walking back the law and policy that feminists put in place to discriminate against men.
I don't know whether you noticed, but the majority of the left's supporters are women (however you define this). The right's basic ideology is gynocentric.
When your basic tenants are based around how women are wonderful and they must be protected there is no defence when women start demanding extra rights.
Somehow cow farts are still featuring prominately in efforts to reduce the non-existant warming.
I wonder what was it that tipped him off? Was it that young boys were told they were privileged and had to pay for oppressing women 20 years ago? Was it that the best talented people were excluded from education because of their race (white, asian) and / or gender (men), which has been happening for the last 15 years.
Or was it the introduction of religious cult into our education system that corrupted the scientific process with emotion and "other ways of knowing" like feminist biology over the last 10 years.
Or the feminist lies that corrupted our legal system effectively destroying the presumption of innocence via #metoo in the last 5 years?
Or is it now that women are being hit with the same woke bat they have been using against men that it's finally too much?