5
dekachin 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've never seen or heard of that.

The reason the public draws a weak correlation between savants & autists is that an autist needs to be highly talented for people to be willing to put up with their bullshit.

Same thing with black guys in college. Since most black guys in college are only getting in because of basketball & football, a lot of white college kids just start to assume that all black dudes are tall & athletic. It's a perception bias based on only being exposed to a non-representative sample.

3
dekachin 3 points ago +3 / -0

they are NEETS with horrendous social skills who get bullied harshly, who will struggle to form relationships, and people around them can tell theyre retarded.

This is trying to put a sympathetic spin. Autistic guys are typically ASSHOLES. Their lack of "social skills" generally means "has no filter and says highly offensive shit to people without a second thought or remorse".

An autist is basically a sociopath, but in a social context.

All the biggest assholes I've run into online were all autists. I've had autists on reddit who I beat in arguments stalk my profiles & user accounts for YEARS downvoting, spamming mod reports, and occasionally talking shit.

The internet makes autists far harder to detect (I only caught on to it because I started looking at people's post histories on Reddit & would see them posting in autism subs) so where IRL you can spot them quickly and get the fuck away from them - the proper reaction - online you just assume they're an asshole who won't let shit go until you get red pilled on the fact that a huge number of obnoxious internet anons are actually just autists.

So fuck autists. No sympathy at all. Sure, some probably keep to themselves, but the Very Online ones ought to all get airdropped into some leftist hellhole like Chicago or SF.

by folx
21
dekachin 21 points ago +21 / -0

trans lesbian retro tech nerd, National Parks lover, weeb, Pens fan, & aspiring law student. @LucyKwiatek stan. ex-campaigns (@Emily4PA20, @AllIn_PA, etc.)

(Temp home of @MayaKingPA until 4/30!) Archived bio (2020): @SRSGA Senator. @WSRUfm radio host. she/her. Penguins. Weather nerd. ✡️, ♿️. Former Dem staff.

reddit-mod-tier tranny college student activist jew who volunteered for democrat campaigns & think this means he can claim to be "staff".

why are so many trannies, jews?

my girlfriend [tranny]

So let me get this straight. Two dudes pretend to be women, claim to be lesbians, fuck each other & claim that's not gay? Is this a 1990s AOL singles chat room?

DMs are open for any vibrator company

Is this referring to an actual company that makes vibrators, or some kind of tranny slang trying to hook up? Don't answer.

1
dekachin 1 point ago +1 / -0

By that standard, you can't indict Assange.

So the way extradition works, I'll say again, is the arresting country has to consent. Canada arrested that top CCP lady from huawei or something and then never actually extradited her.

Whataboutism

It's commie 101 and it gets tiresome to deal with. It's obviously bad faith & propagandistic. I don't care if you call the US a hypocrite. Stop trying to change the subject with commie tactics. My point about UK jurisdiction stands. "but muh USA bad". We get it. We don't care. I can't have a conversation with you anymore bc of shit like this.

Glenn Greenwald can be a real dumb faggot sometimes. Just because he believes in free speech doesn't give him a pass on being a libtard on lots of other things.

And by your standard, if Garland agrees to extradite Trump, the UK could indict him in London.

It wouldn't be up to Garland, it would be up to Garland + the President + a district court judge + the court of appeals + the supreme court. If ALL of them agreed to extradite Trump, then yes, that's what would happen.

24
dekachin 24 points ago +24 / -0

Rick Perry was the front runner for a minute in 2011 until he opened his stupid mouth and said "I don't think you have a heart" if you opposed free college tuition for illegals. All interest in him as a candidate disappeared overnight.

This is exactly the kind of "establishment Republicanism" co-opted by corporations that the Right is absolutely sick of and will no longer tolerate. These idiots still think this is 2004.

Bye Haley, nobody gave a shit about your box checks.

3
dekachin 3 points ago +3 / -0

By blocking other mergers? Your terms are acceptable.

Presumably the UK would enforce its "block" of the merger by banning Microsoft from doing business in the UK. Retaliation would mean banning British companies from doing business in the USA. This is a standard trade war. The UK is way out of line.

What's next, is the mayor of London going to indict Donald Trump? Because apparently the bongs don't know what the word "jurisdiction" means.

Julian Assange

Your whataboutism game is weak. The local jurisdictions he gets arrested in have to consent to US jurisdiction and turn him over. The UK regulator didn't ask the US permission to step in and regulate US businesses.

by folx
25
dekachin 25 points ago +25 / -0

There are lib mothers who are fucking their children up & pushing them into being trans just to tap into this social clout bullshit.

14
dekachin 14 points ago +14 / -0

The UK does not get a veto on one American company buying another American company. If the UK tries to pull that shit on a merger the US govt approves, then the US can and should retaliate against UK companies until the UK government pulls its head out of its ass & respects its limited jurisdiction.

Activision shares dropped almost 10% in pre-market trading on Wednesday, while Microsoft's stock was up nearly 8%.

Shows that the market thinks Activision is trash & MSFT shouldn't be wasting money on it. I agree.

7
dekachin 7 points ago +7 / -0

honestly this lolicon infestation we've picked up in this sub is somehow even worse than dealing with trannies.

9
dekachin 9 points ago +9 / -0

I saw absolutely nothing from her at any point in the show that impressed me or caused me to respect her skill as an actress. You keep insisting that she's "oh so good" but I disagree.

There were plenty of scenes where she was annoying, though.

The whole thing of her selling Ciri out to the witch to get her powers back was poorly acted, start to finish. The writing was lame but her performance in terms of making any of it believable was also poor.

Go ahead and provide your evidence for scenes where she supposedly blew you away with her acting skills.

6
dekachin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not only that but Crowder knifed the Daily Wire in the back to try to make himself look like some sort of "rebel outlaw" when he was just being a shitty person who betrayed people who saw him as a friend, all just to get a little more hype to make a quick buck.

13
dekachin 13 points ago +13 / -0

The actress sucks & she's ugly. Fans wanted something approximating video game Yennefer. Not this.

4
dekachin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Having a young & cute face as an adult is not lolicon. It is universally regarded as superior & more attractive. Faces are not the problem with lolis. The child bodies & flat chests are. Pretty much all his complaints are about her enormous breasts. It's actually routine in anime to put very young/cute faces on ALL the characters, including men, that's why anime is famous for slapping giant eyes on everyone.

And let's be realistic, try posting "It's normal to sexualize 14-17 yos" on normie sites and see how that goes

Psychologically it is normal to find that age range attractive. In fact, in the psychosexual testing for pedophiles, you are shown pics of 14-17 year old girls, and if you consistently select you are not attracted to them, you are flagged for deception. That's different than posting lewd jailbait photos, though.

progtards to calling her a "child with tits".

Activists will use every weapon at their disposal. Pedophilia has been weaponized by both sides.

Yes, and my point is that the lolishit is a motte and bailey to force a blanket "desexualization" on anime

I don't really believe there is any evidence of that. The only time I see "anime" getting banned, it always turns out to be hentai. Hentai and anime are not the same thing. One of a normal show, the other is porn.

Loli hentai is flatly illegal in many countries, and is questionably illegal in the United States. While a ban on it was held to violate free speech at one point, Congress just passed the law again with small changes & the later law has never been challenged, but has been used to prosecute multiple hentai collectors.

27
dekachin 27 points ago +27 / -0

The casting for the Witcher was dogshit except for Cavill & most of the other men. The women were pretty much all trash, though.

6
dekachin 6 points ago +6 / -0

ChatGPT, I want John Oliver, except make him a giant faggot, max out his communism slider, find a way to make him even uglier, and also make him a cartoonishly sterotypical jew trope.

Processing...

Output:

Jason Schreier

Moving on.

Jason Schreier was the one pushing that angle when he went "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" I'm not saying the argument has any merit but that's what journos tried and keep trying.

Huh? You just said people claimed the character was a loli. "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" is not that. So my takeaway is that literally no one has ever called that character a loli, and that absolutely not "that's what journos tried and keep trying".

Japanese media has a lot of 17 yo which is a bit of a grey area

17 is not loli. Loli means female children who lack adult sexual characteristics.

The book Lolita defines the term as: "Now I wish to introduce the following idea. Between the age limits of nine and fourteen there occur maidens who, to certain bewitched travelers, twice or many times older than they, reveal their true nature which is not human, but nymphic (that is, demoniac); and these chosen creatures I propose to designate as 'nymphets.'"

"certain bewitched travelers" = pedophiles.

Western culture routinely sexualizes girls in the 14-17 age range. This is not pedophilic, it is normal. Pedophilia is based on psychology, not the law.

This is Angie Varona at age 15. Any psychologically healthy male would find her to be sexually attractive. Pedos would not. Pedos are not attracted to age. If a woman who looks 40 pulls out an ID card that says she's 12, the pedo isn't going to suddenly get an erection. Similarly, there are plenty of women who are 18+ who have no adult sexual characteristics who get famous in porn because pedos masturbate to them because they are "close enough" to the real thing.

I just tried to google "famous tiny girls porn" and fucking google blocked all results & gave me a lecture about child pornography. LOL fucking serious?

Anyway I remembered the meme, Piper Perri is an example of a pedo-bait adult porn actress.

Btw, what do you think about Uzaki chan?

Uzaki chan is obviously not a loli as she has adult sexual characteristics. Big tits. Internet feminists got angry about her show because the character is a big tittied stupid bimbo that is the polar opposite of the "stronk wamen" they coerced Netflix into force feeding everyone. Feminists hate anything that caters to men.

9
dekachin 9 points ago +9 / -0
  1. Any character with big tits & adult sexual characteristics is by definition not a "loli". Nobody with a brain thinks this is a loli. In fact, it's the opposite of a loli. Opinions do not matter unless they are widely held.

  2. Nobody has a problem with female children being depicted in media so long as they are not sexualized. The word "loli" is generally only used to describe depictions of female children which have been tweaked to appeal to pedophiles. The term "loli" comes from the book "Lolita", a book about a pedophile. It carries an explicitly pedophilic sexual connotation.

11
dekachin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Some pedo colonists have landed on our shores. 8 days ago I posted a topic that really blew up and ended up with a lot of firefights between the sub locals and the pedo colonists. That topic was really the 1st wake up call I got that these pedos were even in the sub. So apparently they feel like they held their own in that topic & want to post offensively now.

These pedos insist that they're not pedos. In fact, they swear that if they ever saw a pedo, they'd punch him or something. They insist that aggressively masturbating to cartoon characters which have been designed to look like, talk like, and act like, little girls has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia & HOWDAREYOUSIR for even suggesting it.

These people are every bit as mentally ill & deluded as trannies. The difference is that while trannies are at the top of the Left's intersectional hierarchy, these pedo "loli lovers" are still mostly shunned by the Left - at least if they are "just" straight white males. If they were trannies or faggots, they'd get a pass.

2
dekachin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gay men used to have a pass to shit talk women until 5 minutes ago. That's why Don Lemon was so shocked when women pushed back on him. He'd been talking shit about women his whole life and then out of nowhere, he gets "MeToo'd".

18
dekachin 18 points ago +18 / -0

Democrat assholes did everything in their power to get anyone who was reluctant to get vaccinated FIRED from hospitals, the government, and the military. They also did all they could to expand this throughout the entire economy.

2
dekachin 2 points ago +2 / -0

conspiratorial thinkers are already so certain that the UFOs are out there, that they will confirmation bias the shit out of anything that confirms their delusions. It's easy to make a case for anything if you set your burden of proof low enough.

11
dekachin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Tucker leaving Fox is another nail in the coffin of traditional television media.

Who is going to watch that shit anymore when all the talent has gone elsewhere?

Boomers are going to finally start using Youtube so they can subscribe to Tucker.

9
dekachin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not even the power of faggotry & blackness combined could withstand the power of the gynocracy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›