By that standard, you can't indict Assange.

So the way extradition works, I'll say again, is the arresting country has to consent. Canada arrested that top CCP lady from huawei or something and then never actually extradited her.

Whataboutism

It's commie 101 and it gets tiresome to deal with. It's obviously bad faith & propagandistic. I don't care if you call the US a hypocrite. Stop trying to change the subject with commie tactics. My point about UK jurisdiction stands. "but muh USA bad". We get it. We don't care. I can't have a conversation with you anymore bc of shit like this.

Glenn Greenwald can be a real dumb faggot sometimes. Just because he believes in free speech doesn't give him a pass on being a libtard on lots of other things.

And by your standard, if Garland agrees to extradite Trump, the UK could indict him in London.

It wouldn't be up to Garland, it would be up to Garland + the President + a district court judge + the court of appeals + the supreme court. If ALL of them agreed to extradite Trump, then yes, that's what would happen.