Why anti-loli spergs need to be killed
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
“People who object to depictions of child pornography are the real pedophiles” is so painfully inversive that I’m tempted to call it satanic.
Have fun getting abducted by sex traffickers due to wasted police resources.
Police resources are already being directed away from apprehending legitimate criminals, so I doubt they have time for loli enjoyers.
Do you know what sex trafficking is? Do you know whom it targets? You sound very stupid. In fact, you sound like a liberal woman.
99% sure he is a tranny based on how he posts
Or a fed looking for juicy screenshots for his boss between dicksuckings.
What the fuck
Some pedo colonists have landed on our shores. 8 days ago I posted a topic that really blew up and ended up with a lot of firefights between the sub locals and the pedo colonists. That topic was really the 1st wake up call I got that these pedos were even in the sub. So apparently they feel like they held their own in that topic & want to post offensively now.
These pedos insist that they're not pedos. In fact, they swear that if they ever saw a pedo, they'd punch him or something. They insist that aggressively masturbating to cartoon characters which have been designed to look like, talk like, and act like, little girls has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia & HOWDAREYOUSIR for even suggesting it.
These people are every bit as mentally ill & deluded as trannies. The difference is that while trannies are at the top of the Left's intersectional hierarchy, these pedo "loli lovers" are still mostly shunned by the Left - at least if they are "just" straight white males. If they were trannies or faggots, they'd get a pass.
It never stops being funny that loli brings so many people out of the woodwork here, not Jew shit, women shit, White Nationalism, the war in Ukraine, or Trump vs. DeSantis.
No, loli of all fucking things
Loli shit exists directly on the fault line between libertarianism/classical liberalism and traditionalism/conservatism. Some people here think that illustrations of child pornography fall squarely under freedom of speech while others believe it doesn’t violate NPA. On the flip side, some of us think it is obviously degenerate, and that a society with no mechanisms for preventing degeneracy will invariably fall to degenerates. So yeah, it’s a subject that pushes buttons for almost every political demo here.
And then it is an issue further exasperated by the fact that there are many like me who have a personal distaste of loli but fear that any attempt to ban it will be used to ban all anime (thereby cutting off one of the means currently tearing Western entertainment's asshole out), or lead to further restrictions and censorship. As has happened many times with these sorts of issues.
I dont think it will ever not be a contentious subject for all of those reasons.
Speaking of that I hate realistic child sex dolls and think that only pedophiles would like them, but at the same time think they are unbannable without causing complications with petite sized dolls and crap with unrealistic designs possibly including blow-up dolls with printed artwork based designs on them.
The problem is no group has the BALLS to do studies if sex dolls or FICTIONAL content can reduce a pedophiles sexual urges because who is going to fund it?
The right won't from a moral view of they want them dead (I can sympathise with that view) and the left won't because they're a few months away from giving it it's own letter and saying 'there's nothing wrong with pedophilia'
I'm just at stopping ALL child abuse from happening, if that can be done using sex dolls and fictional content, do it as I don't care about plastic or drawings. But we don't know directly how effective they are we can only go of assumptions and conclusions based on different cultures and their crime reports.
Keep in mind the lolishit could very well be end up in a slippery slope seeing that progtards consider things like The Sorceress from Dragon's Crown a loli
Any character with big tits & adult sexual characteristics is by definition not a "loli". Nobody with a brain thinks this is a loli. In fact, it's the opposite of a loli. Opinions do not matter unless they are widely held.
Nobody has a problem with female children being depicted in media so long as they are not sexualized. The word "loli" is generally only used to describe depictions of female children which have been tweaked to appeal to pedophiles. The term "loli" comes from the book "Lolita", a book about a pedophile. It carries an explicitly pedophilic sexual connotation.
We strongly disagree on many things, but this board’s pedo problem isn’t one of them.
Jason Schreier was the one pushing that angle when he went "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" I'm not saying the argument has any merit but that's what journos tried and keep trying.
Japanese media has a lot of 17 yo which is a bit of a grey area but progs reduce it to underage -> Loli. See the recent Fire Emblem
Btw, what do you think about Uzaki chan?
ChatGPT, I want John Oliver, except make him a giant faggot, max out his communism slider, find a way to make him even uglier, and also make him a cartoonishly sterotypical jew trope.
Processing...
Output:
Moving on.
Huh? You just said people claimed the character was a loli. "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" is not that. So my takeaway is that literally no one has ever called that character a loli, and that absolutely not "that's what journos tried and keep trying".
17 is not loli. Loli means female children who lack adult sexual characteristics.
The book Lolita defines the term as: "Now I wish to introduce the following idea. Between the age limits of nine and fourteen there occur maidens who, to certain bewitched travelers, twice or many times older than they, reveal their true nature which is not human, but nymphic (that is, demoniac); and these chosen creatures I propose to designate as 'nymphets.'"
"certain bewitched travelers" = pedophiles.
Western culture routinely sexualizes girls in the 14-17 age range. This is not pedophilic, it is normal. Pedophilia is based on psychology, not the law.
This is Angie Varona at age 15. Any psychologically healthy male would find her to be sexually attractive. Pedos would not. Pedos are not attracted to age. If a woman who looks 40 pulls out an ID card that says she's 12, the pedo isn't going to suddenly get an erection. Similarly, there are plenty of women who are 18+ who have no adult sexual characteristics who get famous in porn because pedos masturbate to them because they are "close enough" to the real thing.
I just tried to google "famous tiny girls porn" and fucking google blocked all results & gave me a lecture about child pornography. LOL fucking serious?
Anyway I remembered the meme, Piper Perri is an example of a pedo-bait adult porn actress.
Uzaki chan is obviously not a loli as she has adult sexual characteristics. Big tits. Internet feminists got angry about her show because the character is a big tittied stupid bimbo that is the polar opposite of the "stronk wamen" they coerced Netflix into force feeding everyone. Feminists hate anything that caters to men.
Schreier
Iirc he later clarified he meant a youthful face is a "lolicon fantasy" but I can't find the tweet rn
edit: I'm idiot, it says it right there: 'she has a very childish face that resembles lolicon imagery'
cool, I'm not arguing that, I'm saying progs put lolis and everything else that isn't explicitly 18+ in the same bag. Ie, Asuka Langley and Yoko Littner. Again, I don't think that argument has merits but that's what progtards push for. And let's be realistic, try posting "It's normal to sexualize 14-17 yos" on normie sites and see how that goes
Same goes for Uzaki chan, she is sugoi dekai, but if you were on twatter around the red cross controversy or the "oh shit, this is getting subbed" controversy, you noticed that didn't stop progtards to calling her a "child with tits".
Yes, and my point is that the lolishit is a motte and bailey to force a blanket "desexualization" on anime
Having a young & cute face as an adult is not lolicon. It is universally regarded as superior & more attractive. Faces are not the problem with lolis. The child bodies & flat chests are. Pretty much all his complaints are about her enormous breasts. It's actually routine in anime to put very young/cute faces on ALL the characters, including men, that's why anime is famous for slapping giant eyes on everyone.
Psychologically it is normal to find that age range attractive. In fact, in the psychosexual testing for pedophiles, you are shown pics of 14-17 year old girls, and if you consistently select you are not attracted to them, you are flagged for deception. That's different than posting lewd jailbait photos, though.
Activists will use every weapon at their disposal. Pedophilia has been weaponized by both sides.
I don't really believe there is any evidence of that. The only time I see "anime" getting banned, it always turns out to be hentai. Hentai and anime are not the same thing. One of a normal show, the other is porn.
Loli hentai is flatly illegal in many countries, and is questionably illegal in the United States. While a ban on it was held to violate free speech at one point, Congress just passed the law again with small changes & the later law has never been challenged, but has been used to prosecute multiple hentai collectors.
There is a line between suggestive and pornographic.
Cartoon child porn is obviously on the bad side of that line. Exaggerated cleavage could be either depending on the context. But that is an argument we can have. Saying nothing is off limits because it is drawn is retarded reductionism.
Well said.
Oh I get it. You are playing the "tell me you're a pedo without saying you are a pedo" gane
Have fun getting abducted by sex traffickers due to wasted police resources.
People like you diluting the meaning of the word "pedo" is why now a days when someone says "pedo" i dont know if its because an actual child got hurt or whether its just someone whining about anime again.
Please stop it with the death-threats. It makes it very hard to agree with you, despite the fact that I love lolis and tomboys and pettanko's.
People who can't separate fiction from reality are just sad and people who act on emotions alone are pitiable. We laughingly call them woke sometimes, but forget the prudes.
Admittedly, I have kind of lost it when it came to dealing with those people.
I am literally telling people that they and everyone they know deserve to get abducted by sex traffickers because the same motherfuckers wish death and prison rape upon people like me who just like offensive crap. I saw anti-loli spergs use anti-pedo woodchipper macros against me and others for defending lolisho, and as for the "sex trafficker" thing it's just what I see as a natural consequence of wasting police resources on porn artists and their fans, I also suspect aggressive catering to the regressive left is letting rapists and traffickers get away but yeah.
At this point I wonder if the infighting over offensive artwork will ever stop or if it will continue to escalate, I have seen such infighting on the left and have seen others mention the exact same thing so it would be in our advantage to stop using lolisho as an excuse to call people pedophiles.
i do understand how you feel. And a lot of these same people pay more attention to bitching about loli than about actual issues. I think someone put it best. They treat fictional characters like real people and real people like fictional characters
Weren't you the fucker saying racism was bad the other day? You are a liberal.
Eh, the board culture shifted too much.
Edit: I actually have no idea what this guy was talking about.
One of the main reasons I'm not on twitter, that and the open retardation on there..
Also can they stop transing EVERY tomboy that's available in media, I'm surprised they haven't tried with Tomo-chan yet. 16 isn't pedo you idiots it's Ephebophilia which is ages 15-19 which depending on state and county, is LEGAL unlike pedophilia. You'll still get weird looks if a 30 year old dates an 18 year old but that's all they can do.
It's like a constant push to degrade the definition of pedophilia so that it becomes as dismissed as Nazi is today.
Post Reported for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech (x3)
Post Removed: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
twitter is a place where liking anime characters is worse than being an actual sex offender https://postimg.cc/YGGGqLCq