Why anti-loli spergs need to be killed
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Jason Schreier was the one pushing that angle when he went "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" I'm not saying the argument has any merit but that's what journos tried and keep trying.
Japanese media has a lot of 17 yo which is a bit of a grey area but progs reduce it to underage -> Loli. See the recent Fire Emblem
Btw, what do you think about Uzaki chan?
ChatGPT, I want John Oliver, except make him a giant faggot, max out his communism slider, find a way to make him even uglier, and also make him a cartoonishly sterotypical jew trope.
Processing...
Output:
Moving on.
Huh? You just said people claimed the character was a loli. "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" is not that. So my takeaway is that literally no one has ever called that character a loli, and that absolutely not "that's what journos tried and keep trying".
17 is not loli. Loli means female children who lack adult sexual characteristics.
The book Lolita defines the term as: "Now I wish to introduce the following idea. Between the age limits of nine and fourteen there occur maidens who, to certain bewitched travelers, twice or many times older than they, reveal their true nature which is not human, but nymphic (that is, demoniac); and these chosen creatures I propose to designate as 'nymphets.'"
"certain bewitched travelers" = pedophiles.
Western culture routinely sexualizes girls in the 14-17 age range. This is not pedophilic, it is normal. Pedophilia is based on psychology, not the law.
This is Angie Varona at age 15. Any psychologically healthy male would find her to be sexually attractive. Pedos would not. Pedos are not attracted to age. If a woman who looks 40 pulls out an ID card that says she's 12, the pedo isn't going to suddenly get an erection. Similarly, there are plenty of women who are 18+ who have no adult sexual characteristics who get famous in porn because pedos masturbate to them because they are "close enough" to the real thing.
I just tried to google "famous tiny girls porn" and fucking google blocked all results & gave me a lecture about child pornography. LOL fucking serious?
Anyway I remembered the meme, Piper Perri is an example of a pedo-bait adult porn actress.
Uzaki chan is obviously not a loli as she has adult sexual characteristics. Big tits. Internet feminists got angry about her show because the character is a big tittied stupid bimbo that is the polar opposite of the "stronk wamen" they coerced Netflix into force feeding everyone. Feminists hate anything that caters to men.
Schreier
Iirc he later clarified he meant a youthful face is a "lolicon fantasy" but I can't find the tweet rn
edit: I'm idiot, it says it right there: 'she has a very childish face that resembles lolicon imagery'
cool, I'm not arguing that, I'm saying progs put lolis and everything else that isn't explicitly 18+ in the same bag. Ie, Asuka Langley and Yoko Littner. Again, I don't think that argument has merits but that's what progtards push for. And let's be realistic, try posting "It's normal to sexualize 14-17 yos" on normie sites and see how that goes
Same goes for Uzaki chan, she is sugoi dekai, but if you were on twatter around the red cross controversy or the "oh shit, this is getting subbed" controversy, you noticed that didn't stop progtards to calling her a "child with tits".
Yes, and my point is that the lolishit is a motte and bailey to force a blanket "desexualization" on anime
Having a young & cute face as an adult is not lolicon. It is universally regarded as superior & more attractive. Faces are not the problem with lolis. The child bodies & flat chests are. Pretty much all his complaints are about her enormous breasts. It's actually routine in anime to put very young/cute faces on ALL the characters, including men, that's why anime is famous for slapping giant eyes on everyone.
Psychologically it is normal to find that age range attractive. In fact, in the psychosexual testing for pedophiles, you are shown pics of 14-17 year old girls, and if you consistently select you are not attracted to them, you are flagged for deception. That's different than posting lewd jailbait photos, though.
Activists will use every weapon at their disposal. Pedophilia has been weaponized by both sides.
I don't really believe there is any evidence of that. The only time I see "anime" getting banned, it always turns out to be hentai. Hentai and anime are not the same thing. One of a normal show, the other is porn.
Loli hentai is flatly illegal in many countries, and is questionably illegal in the United States. While a ban on it was held to violate free speech at one point, Congress just passed the law again with small changes & the later law has never been challenged, but has been used to prosecute multiple hentai collectors.
Dude, i'm not the one arguing the first two points.
K