Why anti-loli spergs need to be killed
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Keep in mind the lolishit could very well be end up in a slippery slope seeing that progtards consider things like The Sorceress from Dragon's Crown a loli
Any character with big tits & adult sexual characteristics is by definition not a "loli". Nobody with a brain thinks this is a loli. In fact, it's the opposite of a loli. Opinions do not matter unless they are widely held.
Nobody has a problem with female children being depicted in media so long as they are not sexualized. The word "loli" is generally only used to describe depictions of female children which have been tweaked to appeal to pedophiles. The term "loli" comes from the book "Lolita", a book about a pedophile. It carries an explicitly pedophilic sexual connotation.
Jason Schreier was the one pushing that angle when he went "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" I'm not saying the argument has any merit but that's what journos tried and keep trying.
Japanese media has a lot of 17 yo which is a bit of a grey area but progs reduce it to underage -> Loli. See the recent Fire Emblem
Btw, what do you think about Uzaki chan?
ChatGPT, I want John Oliver, except make him a giant faggot, max out his communism slider, find a way to make him even uglier, and also make him a cartoonishly sterotypical jew trope.
Processing...
Output:
Moving on.
Huh? You just said people claimed the character was a loli. "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" is not that. So my takeaway is that literally no one has ever called that character a loli, and that absolutely not "that's what journos tried and keep trying".
17 is not loli. Loli means female children who lack adult sexual characteristics.
The book Lolita defines the term as: "Now I wish to introduce the following idea. Between the age limits of nine and fourteen there occur maidens who, to certain bewitched travelers, twice or many times older than they, reveal their true nature which is not human, but nymphic (that is, demoniac); and these chosen creatures I propose to designate as 'nymphets.'"
"certain bewitched travelers" = pedophiles.
Western culture routinely sexualizes girls in the 14-17 age range. This is not pedophilic, it is normal. Pedophilia is based on psychology, not the law.
This is Angie Varona at age 15. Any psychologically healthy male would find her to be sexually attractive. Pedos would not. Pedos are not attracted to age. If a woman who looks 40 pulls out an ID card that says she's 12, the pedo isn't going to suddenly get an erection. Similarly, there are plenty of women who are 18+ who have no adult sexual characteristics who get famous in porn because pedos masturbate to them because they are "close enough" to the real thing.
I just tried to google "famous tiny girls porn" and fucking google blocked all results & gave me a lecture about child pornography. LOL fucking serious?
Anyway I remembered the meme, Piper Perri is an example of a pedo-bait adult porn actress.
Uzaki chan is obviously not a loli as she has adult sexual characteristics. Big tits. Internet feminists got angry about her show because the character is a big tittied stupid bimbo that is the polar opposite of the "stronk wamen" they coerced Netflix into force feeding everyone. Feminists hate anything that caters to men.
Schreier
Iirc he later clarified he meant a youthful face is a "lolicon fantasy" but I can't find the tweet rn
edit: I'm idiot, it says it right there: 'she has a very childish face that resembles lolicon imagery'
cool, I'm not arguing that, I'm saying progs put lolis and everything else that isn't explicitly 18+ in the same bag. Ie, Asuka Langley and Yoko Littner. Again, I don't think that argument has merits but that's what progtards push for. And let's be realistic, try posting "It's normal to sexualize 14-17 yos" on normie sites and see how that goes
Same goes for Uzaki chan, she is sugoi dekai, but if you were on twatter around the red cross controversy or the "oh shit, this is getting subbed" controversy, you noticed that didn't stop progtards to calling her a "child with tits".
Yes, and my point is that the lolishit is a motte and bailey to force a blanket "desexualization" on anime
We strongly disagree on many things, but this board’s pedo problem isn’t one of them.
There is a line between suggestive and pornographic.
Cartoon child porn is obviously on the bad side of that line. Exaggerated cleavage could be either depending on the context. But that is an argument we can have. Saying nothing is off limits because it is drawn is retarded reductionism.