Why anti-loli spergs need to be killed
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
What the fuck
Some pedo colonists have landed on our shores. 8 days ago I posted a topic that really blew up and ended up with a lot of firefights between the sub locals and the pedo colonists. That topic was really the 1st wake up call I got that these pedos were even in the sub. So apparently they feel like they held their own in that topic & want to post offensively now.
These pedos insist that they're not pedos. In fact, they swear that if they ever saw a pedo, they'd punch him or something. They insist that aggressively masturbating to cartoon characters which have been designed to look like, talk like, and act like, little girls has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia & HOWDAREYOUSIR for even suggesting it.
These people are every bit as mentally ill & deluded as trannies. The difference is that while trannies are at the top of the Left's intersectional hierarchy, these pedo "loli lovers" are still mostly shunned by the Left - at least if they are "just" straight white males. If they were trannies or faggots, they'd get a pass.
It never stops being funny that loli brings so many people out of the woodwork here, not Jew shit, women shit, White Nationalism, the war in Ukraine, or Trump vs. DeSantis.
No, loli of all fucking things
Loli shit exists directly on the fault line between libertarianism/classical liberalism and traditionalism/conservatism. Some people here think that illustrations of child pornography fall squarely under freedom of speech while others believe it doesn’t violate NPA. On the flip side, some of us think it is obviously degenerate, and that a society with no mechanisms for preventing degeneracy will invariably fall to degenerates. So yeah, it’s a subject that pushes buttons for almost every political demo here.
And then it is an issue further exasperated by the fact that there are many like me who have a personal distaste of loli but fear that any attempt to ban it will be used to ban all anime (thereby cutting off one of the means currently tearing Western entertainment's asshole out), or lead to further restrictions and censorship. As has happened many times with these sorts of issues.
I dont think it will ever not be a contentious subject for all of those reasons.
Keep in mind the lolishit could very well be end up in a slippery slope seeing that progtards consider things like The Sorceress from Dragon's Crown a loli
Any character with big tits & adult sexual characteristics is by definition not a "loli". Nobody with a brain thinks this is a loli. In fact, it's the opposite of a loli. Opinions do not matter unless they are widely held.
Nobody has a problem with female children being depicted in media so long as they are not sexualized. The word "loli" is generally only used to describe depictions of female children which have been tweaked to appeal to pedophiles. The term "loli" comes from the book "Lolita", a book about a pedophile. It carries an explicitly pedophilic sexual connotation.
Jason Schreier was the one pushing that angle when he went "Dragon's crown was designed by a horny teenager" I'm not saying the argument has any merit but that's what journos tried and keep trying.
Japanese media has a lot of 17 yo which is a bit of a grey area but progs reduce it to underage -> Loli. See the recent Fire Emblem
Btw, what do you think about Uzaki chan?
We strongly disagree on many things, but this board’s pedo problem isn’t one of them.
There is a line between suggestive and pornographic.
Cartoon child porn is obviously on the bad side of that line. Exaggerated cleavage could be either depending on the context. But that is an argument we can have. Saying nothing is off limits because it is drawn is retarded reductionism.
Well said.