reasonable request (no Ai)
How is the request reasonable? If you can't distinguish between the things they produce and the things an AI produces there's no reason to pay them.
Also: Looking at what western media shat out in the last few years, you actually can distinguish between AI and actual "human" beings. Sadly, AI seems to produce better things.
I'm torn. I like a lot about the game, especially how it lets you really fuck up. I'm a filthy save-scummer so I don't get the full brunt of that feature ...
Sadly I happen to just dislike DnD -.-
Like in: I don't like the RNG, i don't like the mechanics around spells (having to rest all the time), I don't like that healing is rather useless until later levels, I don't like how a lot of things (spells, weapons, armor) are only viably under certain conditions, half of which I don't even really understand how to create.I don't like when they show you failed (or succesfull) rolls, and I have no idea what the fuck they were for.
What I'm trying to say: I like the game but the mechanics make it so I can only play in rather short bursts.
The sad thing is: The people that initiated this thought this was the right thing to do. They thought they would do this and the parents would welcome the idea (tragically some would).
Imagine the bubble you have to be in to think this is the right thing to do and there won't be noticeable pushback.
As an aside: The people that initiated this lost their job and are barred from being within 150kms of anyone under the age of 18, right? ... Right, guys? Please??
100% - whatever percent of transed kids were groomed by someone else.
That'd be the lower limit.
Because even within mothers that didn't ruin the child themselves there's a sizeable chunk that still bath in the glory of their virtue signaling
Yah, I always thought it somewhat funny when they made their case
This state makes laws that make it so [xyz] can't do [some degenerate shit]. I'm leaving
I mean, sure honey, you do you. It's still a net-positive because there's less [degenerate shit] after you're gone.
And then they stay anyway because they don't want to move to a place were the only thing that is higher then the rent is the crime rate. smh.
If opposition was actually a real thing you could make it so that the opposition is in charge of the randomization. That could mitigate some 'coincidences'
[EDIT]At least for the Q&A-Session. If the lottery-government was real there wouldn't be a way to define an opposition anyway[/EDIT]
“Social justice warrior,” for example, didn’t start off as an insult.
Well, it was at least 'cringe' from the get go.
Critical race theory was once an obscure academic discipline that insisted that racism is more than individual prejudice
Yeah, that's not what CRT is. Anyway, nobody used jiu-jitsu of any kind to turn the term against liberals. The only thing people did was talking about what CRT really is about. Funny how that is enough to turn the term agains yourself. Time for some introspection, no?
Mention almost any touchstone phrase adopted by the left in recent years — “critical race theory,” “diversity,” “global warming,” even the word “liberal” itself — and it has been redefined or tarnished by conservatives.
No, dipshit. Your constant redefinition of everything to use it as a crudge to beat your opponents over the head with has devalued these words to the point that nobody remotely sane could use them without bursting into hysteric laughter, at least internally.
You stripped these words of any meaning that they might once have had to use them as a weapon, now you cry foul when the same weapon is used against you. Get fucked.
If this sounds abstract, consider the evolution of “ woke.”
I'd rather not. It's up there in the cringe-department, right alongside SJW
The word is defined as being “actively aware of social injustice.”
I'm rather sure the word was used before in very different contexts and then it was coopted and redefined to mean what you wrote up there (and then ot got redefined a few million times more to mean absolutely anything and it's opposite at the same time but I repeat myself)
When the term was turned by conservatives and internet culture into something else: a “whiny,” self-righteous progressive who can’t take a joke
Well, show me someone that uses the word unironically and I show you a “whiny,” self-righteous progressive who can’t take a joke. If the shoe fits.
It works if you just exclude everyone that has a different thought. Just ask Biden what he thinks of black people that didn't vote for him.
And why would black rappers align with the right? Well, the rappers they talk about are filthy rich and like most rich people they're not very happy when the state takes their money and gives it to absolute bottom of the barrel-people. People that then get to vote for the state taking even more money to give to them.
This is not the feel-good response you were expecting
I'm sure he was expecting it, considering what the userbase is. He was just hoping people could hold back their urge to make anything about what they want to see for a minute. Yah, I know, he should have known better.
but too bad. Life is not fair
Funny how you felt the need to make it so. You could have written your little rant in almost every other thread (while being completely on topic) but you couldn't have let OP and others have this one, no?
They got it at least half right. Most abuse happens within same-sex (lesbian) relationships.