Both things can't be true.
For the left, neither needs to be true because the truth is not the point. Every talking point is a form of consensus building for establishing in-group and out-group identifiers.
Take JK Rowling for example. She was a darling of the left while she bent and twisted to their whims, changing characters and plot points to please them even though none of it made sense, until she stepped out of line by not loudly and enthusiastically supporting the then "current thing" of transgenderism. Now, they hate her and wish her dead with her years of faithfully following their lead essentially forgotten.
So the point is not a logical outcome, it is to show that the devs behind this mess are still good leftists who deserve continued employment in this field because they made a game that tracks with current year leftism.
I wanted to day drink after watching this earlier today. Not even joking, it ruined my afternoon. Goddamn corpos turning everything in to slop, and friends/family/coworkers gushing over how "fun" it looks just amplifies how much this goddamn ip mined cash grab does not need to exist.
Nothing is sacred, everything is content, and Jack Black is Jack Black.
Considering the string of recent media flops, the modern audience barely exists. In the past, these DIE vanity project were carried forward by the inertia of the big name IPs they bastardized, the affirmative noise of the media, and the weight/ignorance of the normie audience.
However, the normies are now refusing to eat the slop, and the faithful are too few to make up the difference. Not even the most coordinated marketing campaigns with social media shaming support move the needle anymore.
If only this also applied to presidential elections.
I too enjoy shorts! They are quite comfortable and easy to wear.
Also, have you tried flip-flops or Crocs rather than closed toe shoes?
Well damn. I will search out an alternative as I do not Twitter/X. Thank you though.
Did anyone bother to archive? The post has been removed as far as I can see.
In the worst-case scenario, hackers could manipulate a state’s voter list, adding fictitious people to the rolls, changing real voters’ information or directing voters to the wrong polling places on Election Day.
Oh no! At least they are not padding the rolls with the dead!
I knew I remembered that stupid picture from somewhere!
Unfortunately, the original post has since been removed, so I cannot provide further context, but the antics of this idiot have been featured on this board before.
Which is a great short story to have someone who is beginning to notice and then question read.
...Corpse Husband? Is that you?
And people laughed at me when I said that "trauma dumping" donations would be the beginning of the end for GDQ.
Need Another Seven Astronauts.
No Whites, Men or Irish need apply.
Is it AI generated voices? That would explain the strange cadence and almost complete lack of emotion.
The parents, who are in their 40s and African-American, say their son was at risk because his condition means he is vulnerable to social manipulation.
Was? No, is. He is at risk, and the longer the state has him away from his family, the greater that risk becomes.
Farrell, who uses they/them pronouns
So the "talentless freaks" comment was projection?
secret classes operating under a strict security protocol
Allow in reporters who take pictures of participants.
Added bonus: archived article!
What are the odds that this will be just as staged and scripted as her campaign stops?
Embracing the "internet of things" is essentially filling your entire life with electronic spies then wondering why you have no privacy.
Similar to being short, or autistic, or having brown hair, it is a trait, not a super power, and a very large amount of how useful it is depends on who you are, which is shaped by upbringing and life experience.
Lesbian space witches who lived in a flammable rock base. Who also had no issue with using the Force "Thread that binds all things" to mind fuck someone visiting their flammable rock base to try to convince him to leave.
The official in question wrote a sizeable paper (link to PDF) while at the Stimson Center (link to archived website). From what I have read of the paper, it states that "white supremacist" domestic violence extremists (DVE) are the greatest threat to nuclear security, and that DEI based initiatives are the best way to counter that threat. Sources seem to be a "broad literature review" and workshops where the 22 participants are anonymous.
Mass firings? A bunch of them just up and quit the last time he won.
Maybe he did not know that killing a man in broad daylight by a shot to the back of the head and then another when he is on the ground is wrong? Could this style of execution just be his culture? Or was he lashing out by murdering a man rather than having a "sexual emergency"?
If "marginalized people" cannot have generational wealth, no one can!
Looting from the people and places you have conquered is a bit different from stealing from your own populace, though both are theft in one form or another.