The reee'ing is a distraction from the fact that Bruce Reinhart was a prosecutor involved in Epstein's plea deal who then immediately resigned to work for Epstein. That is the only important piece of information and the regime doesn't want to talk about it.
Fuck their crying. I wouldn't even care if Kilmeade explicitly lied and said it was a real picture. The magistrate who signed off on the Trump raid was an accomplice to Epstein's child sex slave operation.
Are these things psyops? It comes off as a form of cargo cult. They see that lawyers use words, so they try to figure out the all powerful series of words that will force the government to bow to them.
Even if these sovereign citizen types were right about everything, it doesn't matter if the people arresting you call themselves a corporation or a government; you are still going to jail. The important thing is whether power resides with your friends or your enemies.
There isn't one source that has everything neatly organized. Diving face first into the rabbit hole is really the only way. I've heard BlackPilled has a decent deep dive, although I haven't watched it yet.
There's some good reasons to believe the explosives that actually took down the building were strategically placed charges on the support columns themselves, which the wikitard article tries to avoid. One of the witnesses that fingered Andreas Strassmeir saw a trio of men placing what she called putty and wires in the building a couple days before. A local university seismograph registered three distinct events, which correlates with two detonations and the building collapse. There was debris scattered by an explosion that would have had to fly past the truck to get to the other side of the street, which would indicate it was thrown by a blast from within the building. Some columns nearest the truck were intact and the explosion miraculously wrapped around them to destroy other columns that were hidden behind them. And finally, the additional unexploded ordnance were most likely demo charges that were blown off by the other discrete charges due to improper timing.
Spez: There is also a good comparison to be made with the Khobar Tower bombing in Saudi Arabia. That attack used 5,000lbs of real deal plastic explosives in a more effective configuration against a similar sized structure that had far shoddier construction, and it still only blew off the front facade of the building.
The FBI, CIA and ATF have been responsible for some the worst acts of terrorism on American soil. The Wikipedia article on Oklahoma City bombing conspiracy theories is hilariously convincing.
"These crazy people think USG was involved because one of the alleged bombers was escorted out of the US by the CIA and GSG-9; explosives experts concluded an ANFO bomb of that size couldn't have done that damage, including buidling and testing replica bombs; additional unexploded ordnance was found on site; every single witness reported seeing additional conspirators; and the security footage was erased. It's obviously a baseless conspiracy theory to not believe the government when there is all this overwhelming evidence against the official story."
-Wikitards, probably
So you want to spread the liberal revolution around the world by force? That's the basic premise of neoconservatism, which can be traced back through Trotsky and Napoleon. What does anti-totalitarianism even mean? When has any sphere of society existed outside of politics?
Because you are appealing to shitlib sensibilities by framing yourself as the real antifascist, which has been the official regime ideology since the 30s.
How has accusing the left of being the real fascists/racists/etc been working out for the last 80 years? Has it given you the social prestige from shitlibs that you so desire?
Allowing defunct 20th century ideologies, that were peculiar to a specific time, place and peoples, to haunt the current discourse will forever doom us. Orwell said the word fascism was meaningless by the mid 1930s:
It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else... Except for the relatively small number of Fascist sympathizers, almost any English person would accept ‘bully’ as a synonym for ‘Fascist’. That is about as near to a definition as this much-abused word has come.
Paul Gottfried's Fascism Career Of A Concept is the definitive work on the topic if you actually care to understand it:
Fascists were on the Right by virtue of having opposed the Left in theory and practice, but that was not the same as standing for a past that was already in decline. Fascists were not linked to any one social class and moved back and forth, as in Italy, when they tried to satisfy followers from varied social backgrounds. Finally, fascism was a situational rather than a theoretical movement. Unlike the Marxists, fascists did not claim to be teaching a scientific form of socialism held together by historical and economic laws.
Or you can continue working within the leftist frame by declaring yourself the real antifa and get steam rolled anyways. The shitlibs will never accept you.
Jail is the lenient option.
This is the deep state declaring themselves above the office of the President. That has been the practical reality for decades, but now they want to make it official.
The only solution is a complete regime change that would make Stalin think the purging was excessive.
There aren't words that can appropriately convey the evil of the western regime.
Calling everything you don't like fascist is just as dumb as when the progressives do it, and it is far less effective because it is simply one of their word for designating enemies. Fascism is peculiar to mid-century Italy and cannot exist outside of that context.
The second letter to the editor here, from another 'unfortunate', is written by a 19th century London strumpet with no formal education. Compare that to any writings coming out of Harvard and it's clear that our educational institutions are actively retarding.
Forcing people into debt slavery for the privilege of severe intellectual injury is abhorrent. It is only reasonable to forgive all student loans after these malicious institutions and their assets have been seized and their records destroyed. If anyone has accidentally gained useful skills from these most deleterious programs, it will be easily demonstrable without requiring the presentation of a certificate of indoctrination.
I identify as infallible gender and my pronouns are the infallible one/his infallibleness. If the teacher says I'm wrong or marks my test wrong, she is transphobic.
The dissident sphere has been using regime for a while. I basically win any IRL discussion with leftists whenever I throw out the term regime. They aren't prepared to argue from a position of complete dominance when they are supposed to be underdogs, so they just bluescreen out.
Hunter and Joe are symptoms, not the source of the problem. A more reasonable compromise position would be to start by fedposting the top feds, then continue clearing out from there.
Watergate was a politically motivated hit job and Nixon's only mistake was not being paranoid enough.
Rittenhouse sent a message that lawless pedophiles are at risk of being justly killed, which made every politician and leftist feel personally targeted.
Trump needs to stop appealing to regime lies such as Watergate, which was more similar to the Russia hoax. It doesn't work and reinforces the enemy's frame. This is closer to Waco except they aren't blowing up his children yet.
As a Huey Long appreciator, it is silly on its face to not expect an elite class to use positions of power to enrich themselves, their friends, and their families. The problem is when they do so without providing any benefits to the ruled. We find ourselves in the worst case scenario where the elites are enriching themselves through the gleeful annihilation of those they govern.
The real problem is that Trump just whined about the fraud instead of doing anything about it, such as heads on pikes.
Islam is too liberal about women.
I regret to inform you that many, if not a sizable majority, of actual judges are part of a cult that is waging a war on reality itself.
Being sanitized and milquetoast isn't the problem. It's the randomly punching right and denouncing the people whose ideas he is using.
I'm once again torn between malicious contempt that they deserve their fate and a burning desire for righteous vengence against those who did this to them.