If EA wants their players to play the women’s matches in FIFA, they need to give their game modes much more support and utility.
Translation: EA needs to hide the best unlocks behind playing the womens team.
The Lotus Eaters continue their rightward drift, slowly but surely.
I brought Culture of Critique.
When do the truckers get reparations?
People watch Andor?
As much as they like to pretend otherwise, the intellectual left rarely actually read any leftist theory. They mostly absorb the ideas from osmosis, and now wikipedia particularly. It's not about rigor and building a coherent framework; it's about using the correct jargon to express whatever idea they have in order to gain prestige. This disinterest appears to have really taken off with the structural marxists, such as Louis Althusser who famously confessed he never read Marx. Zizek comes off the same way.
Spez: Chomsky is an exception and has clearly read Bernays, Lippmann, Foucault, etc.
It's being pushed for multiple factors. Money is merely one of the incentives. It is useful to have a class of tranissaries that are competely dependent on the regime with no attachments and plenty of free time to be enforcers. Sterilizing white children is a plus for those who want to remove whites. Dissolving the obvious reality of distinct sexes advances global homogenization for managerial ease. Undermining the parent child relationship removes potential influences that counter-signal the regime. By giving children the power to choose their gender, it is a short hop to children choosing to get fucked. There are plenty of other motivations.
I just want them to know we read more of their own theory and history than they do.
For the troons watching this thread, you're not a rebel against the system; you're a grooming victim of the pedo elites.
Spez: While I have your attention, here is a more elaborate explaination of why you troons are merely foot soldiers of the regime hosted on the Anarchist Library.
The Father of the Sexual Revolution, Alfred Kinsey, and creator of the Kinsey Scale of sexuality, conducted infant rape and documented it in his 1946 work Sexual Behavior In The Human Male. Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare. A high school in Ohio included child porn as part of it's curriculum, and a high school in Texas was caught giving kids pedo fan fic.
Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity... Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them. They need us badly.
-Pat Califia, The Aftermath of the Great Kiddy-Porn Panic of '77
Naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries, for both parents and onlookers. So to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous.
-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA
This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Suppression of the natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, good and adjusted in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. Initially, the child has to submit to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family, which process makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and anxiety.
-Wilhem Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, his work is the basis of Adorno's Authoritarian Personality
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
Preddit is run by tranny pedos.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Last updated 18 September 2021
Reminder that the original satanic panic was completely justified. There were a lot of killers explicitly murdering people in the name of satan such as the West Memphis Three, David Berkowitz, Richard Ramirez, Edward Bennett and Joseph Beeson, Sean Sellers, Pete Roland and friends, Scott Waterhouse, and many more.
Put me down for inappropriate. Send them back out of the country instead of deeper into the US where the dems will re-route them into unconquered white neighborhoods, then thank the reps for the help. The one to Martha's Vineyard was fine as a stunt, but why not capitalize on that in a way that actually creates more power for your own political allies.
The republicucks deserve to lose. Perhaps we should be trying to take over the dems instead. They have the will to power and know how to kick aliens out of their neighborhoods.
All those movies where the good guys hack the TV or whatever to broadcast the truth and then win as a result were silly. If all the evil people running the world went on CNN to confess the horrors they did for 24 hours and then the news went back to normal, the majority of the population would be completely unfazed.
All the thought experiments and SciFi exploration about the dangers of AI and how to possibly restrain it were a complete waste of time. The weak AIs running the social media feeds are already effectively in charge. The engineer who writes them is himself manipulated by them in a self-agitating feedback loop, and, even if he is resistant to it, his boss isn't.
It would be foolish not to assume a women stuck on the side of the road can't fix her car. Most men can't even fix their own cars anymore, and women as a group haven't made any progress on that front since the car was invented.
Most of the west, where real purchasing power has been decreasing for some time. When at one time a lowly laborer could afford a decent home, many people are huddled in tiny apartments downing bottles of anti-depressants. GDP is the absolutely worst metric. It goes up when governments print money, which typically spurs asset inflation.
The reign of quantity is an inherently self-destructive mindset that tears at the foundations of civilization and only functions to legitimize technocratic rule. Line go up doesn't inherently translate to better material conditions for the populace; it means line go up.
NYT is afraid, but not because of DeSantis particularly. They are afraid that people don't read them much anymore and that they've lost control of both parties. Some of their people want to split both parties by spinning out overtly socialist and overtly fascist parties.
What's the meta here? Do they think DeSantis is going to be the candidate? Are they purposefully denigrating DeSantis hoping to boost his numbers?
Let's pretend that is true for a moment. Why is line go up more important than a cohesive high trust society where small children could safely wander the streets alone?
People who push the global warming noncesense have absolutely fueled my hate. They lay in the street, damage great art, cripple energy grids, and none, I believe, are good people.
After a quick search to figure out where you got this silly idea that Carlos Slim runs NYT, class A stocks are publicly traded and account for 85% of ownership but only 30% of votes. Slim owns enough class A to make him the largest shareholder with 17% of the company, which gives a whopping 6% voting control. The other 15% of shares is class B with 70% of the votes, which comprises the entirety of the Ochs-Sulzberger Family Trust's 13% shares giving them 60% of the vote.
It's not exactly a secret that the Sulzbergers are the hereditary monarchs of NYT. The latest one is both publisher of NYT and chairman of the board of NYT Co.
He's talking about the Sulzbergers who have controlled the NYT since Aldolph Ochs bought it in 1896.
Holding the plebs responsible for the actions of the elite has been the mindset of western liberals since at least WW1. That is what justified the treaty of Versailles, the firebombings of Dresden, the nuking of Japan, the obliteration of villages in Vietnam, every economic sanction such as those that lead to the starvation of Iraqi children. It has demonstrably never worked as intended, but it's an unassailable paradigm in liberal foreign policy.