Birdspandas aren't real.
"Your honor, it's a sphere, not a ball."
"A ball is any sphere in throwable format."
"New Palworld update. Spheres replaced with Pal Ellipsoids."
This is laughable.
Pal catching mechanism is also more elaborate, though to me it looks very "gambling machine lights flashing".
Don't let ''embarassment'' by Walsh standarts push you to ruin your health, mental and physical.
I found a job that I could do within my limits and it was much better long term than ending up sick unable to work for months and then terrified of it happening again if I went back.
Thankfully with flexible hours, it happened a few times I asked my boss to leave because I wasen't productive and I'd be back ASAP.
He get more worth for his money, I don't ruin my health.
Walsh has 2 redeeming qualities : 1- He opposes troonery without detours : it's a lie, don't entertain the lie, it's an abominable act to do onto minors with permanent consequences.
2- He made many White babies.
On most other subjets I will not agree with him, but the bar is so low right now just producing 3+ White children is a step above most, myself included.
Then it's going nowhere, since ''their gameplay mechanic is too similar'' is a horrible argument. And it if got anywhere, it would be devastating for games development. ( A good game mechanic could be stuck forever in a shitty game. Case in point ; new Pokémon games have become pretty shitty. ).
https://uk.people.parents.narkive.com/RG1dJ5FU/the-age-of-autism-the-amish-anomaly-by-dan-olmsted
It's not going to convince anyone that believes the government and the pharmaceutical industry would never lie to them to push harmful injections into kids.
There is a troubling lack of curiosity by the ''scientific community'' about that.
we already have ''control groups'' that don't vaccinate their kids, and their kids catch these childhood diseases they aren't vaccinated against, and they are still overall healthier than vaccinated kids.
So that argument against setting up a study with a control group is a dishonest one.
Here is the study :
https://uk.people.parents.narkive.com/RG1dJ5FU/the-age-of-autism-the-amish-anomaly-by-dan-olmsted
Of course the rebutal is ''this isn't peer reviewed, not up to standart, and hasen't been replicated''.
So where are the researchers rushing to study the rate of autism in the part of the Amish population that isn't vaccinated vs the general Amish population, and vs the general population of the USA?
Crickets.
Naziki's family said [...] ''we want justice''.
I do too; deport them all.
Alternatively, Naziki got the justice he deserved, and the rest of his family can get it too.
Imagine setting your century+ old paper's reputation on fire to endorse Kamala Fucking Harris.
This absence of autism among the Amish except for 3, 2 of which were adopted kids that had been vaccinated, should be discussed all over the media and medical boards in every country.
In a sane world, this should have caused a metaphorical earthquake in every medical instutition on the fucking planet.
Instead: crickets.
''Birth-control'' infertility and taking away the children of rural White to ''teach'' them to stop being farmers devastated our towns and villages.
Imagine Iran nuking Israel, City of London, Washington DC and New-York City.
The horror. We'd run out of popcorn.
Diversity and Inclusion happened ( Intersectional race marxism ).
Mentaly incompetant to stand in a Western country for sure.
Tauriel : ''This abnormally-tall dwarf might precipitate my decadal ovulation. Oh my.''
Legolas : ''WTF.''
Mostly peaceful political mouvement.
The episode in all its glory :
''But Netflix taught me that 8 months pregnant wimminz are kickass badass fighters.''
All the dead animals from the Springfield park : ''At least we weren't call racist.''
''Do you want to be replaced by illegal immigrants, or legal immigrant, goy? Vote now!''
They won't accept moderating less. In order the pay as few humans as possible for moderation, they use automated systems based on numbers or reports.
Youtube also has several flags for no-no words that trigger an automatic suspension on the specific content flagged, for manual authorization.
They also have ''danger'' words that trigger automatic banners leading to government propaganda.
Copyright claim? Bam. Automatic demonetized video.
It was a false claim, or obvious Fair Use? Good luck getting through YT to challenge the claim.
You have to prove you did nothing wrong rather than the accuser proving you did something wrong.
As of now, Youtube has no incentive to stop acting like that. Either they lose a precedent-setting court case in the USA ( unlikely when it comes to copyrights, possible when it comes to other suspensions based on reports ).
Youtube also has baked-in double-standarts, where the ''Authoritative Sources'' such as mainstream media channels being allowed to publish things that will get you suspended if you do. Such as video evidence of a violent attack.
You might potentially get away with it if you ''Fair Use'' your way in by posting a snipet of a Mainstream Media video, making sure the Mainstream Media is the only one able to break certain stories, and frame them a certain way.
Because ''safety and inclusion'', of course. Three-Letter-Agencies sure had their say in that.