They want complete societal collapse to build their utopia on the ashes, and they've been trying different methods to obtain it for decades.
I agree that is what their goal is but it is highly debatable if they can achieve that outcome in the aftermath of a collapse. IE I think they are spit-balling. In fact lets look at the Soviet Union itself. They largely ended up with a right wing society after the collapse with the trouble spots being cronyism. And cronyism is the number one problem with almost all human societies.
Time to plug https://larrysanger.org/ as he is opposed to the bastardization of his once noble creation.
Years ago when I first heard about The Donald I was tempted for a moment to make a Reddit account because at the time I was on another old platform that was being modded by leftist Democrats who were always either banning or deleting posts on trumped up grounds. However I already knew how bad Reddit was so I decided to forego it.
When The Donald got banned there it opened the door if The Donald made their own forum, which they obviously did. I stopped posting on the other forum years ago but every now and then I look in. They have maybe two dozen users now...
This story reminds me of a tactic I've seen some men using. Long story short, no long term dating in addition to everything else we know not to do. Basically this far sighted and very wise "judge" just made sure that any man who values good advice will limit himself to short term pump & dump's.
I'm sure that this dynamic will advance society and be very good for women to. (Yes that is sarcasm) Anyway, when you remove societal elements of equity, don't be surprised when the foundations crumble.
The funny part is that he is actually helping them with a correct analysis of what they are doing wrong and where it is going. I think it is basically a definition of insanity to be unable to hear good advice when you are getting it.
That's a deal-breaker for me, and should be for anyone that honors the Constitution.
It's worse than not honoring the constitution. It is a critical failure to understand the point of the 2nd which is to maintain a society that is not enslaved to government which is the overarching foundation of the republic. It is this lack of understanding on his part that makes him completely unsuitable as an elected (supposedly..) rep to the US congress, especially on the Republican side.
It is further incongruous that he "served" in the military and doesn't know this or refuses to adhere to it. It is almost like he is on someone's payroll...
Standing armies have been our downfall because they gave the excuse for things like CIA and many more. I know that it is always a difficult thing to weigh the difference between wanting a good & strong military and wanting a genuine liberty loving republic but with everything I have seen I think the cost of having standing armies just isn't worth it.
That said if we were going to disband our military this isn't how I would have liked to have gone about it.
This is why it is going to be important to root out all of their assets which I suspect is going to be more difficult than we imagine. If these are truly a family operation they will hide assets for generations before making further attempts to seize control again.
I was thinking in terms of the constitutional dictate on this. Which isn't to say that the government would have been a lot better but at least congress would implicitly have at least some better understanding of the importance of maintaining the value of currency rather than how it is now where most of the congress critters literally have no idea at all of how it works and instead feel that Federal Reserve cartel must surely know what they are doing and/or that they (congress) can point the finger at the cartel when things go bad.
It is also a good bet that we would not have had an endless string of wars if the cartel never got a hold of control of the US currency. Oh well, if it didn't happen here it would have happened elsewhere I suppose.
Female Genital Mutilation FGM in the third world shit hole cultures is done by older women on young females. Women have the mixed blessing of being cultural continuers. It can be good when it is done in the name of wholesome holidays but in the case of FGM it is a nightmare.
The question here is if this is going to be some kind of cultural condition. I really want to say no but when you see women like this one backing the insanity of mutilation of their own child it makes you decide what kind of cultural future you want to have.
And by "make" I mean you better make up your damn mind now about what to do about this because otherwise we know how this can end up.
Fighting in a crowd is always stupid. The winning move is to see the bad scene developing and then fade out.