United States Safe Space Force
(twitter.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
If I was a military drill instructor I'd insist on making my pronouns something really screwed up instead of "sir" so all the new recruits would constantly screw them up. Then I'd look for another job when my enlistment was up
"PRIVATE DID YOU JUST REFER TO ME AS 'SCRIM' WHEN THE PROPER PRONOUN TO USE IN THAT FORM OF AD-DRESS IS 'SCLUR'? YOU ARE A HATEFUL BIGOT PRIVATE, IT MAKES ME SICK TO SERVE BESIDE BIGOTED SEWER FILTH SUCH AS YOURSELF - NOW DROP AND GIVE ME TWENTY!"
What's happening to the US armed forces?
What to know what they need? Why not listen to what a former Navy Seal says:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJusjxAwPnA
Theyre purging all the actual patriots with the vax mandate. Soon theyll turn the army on the citizenry, assuming they dont go to war with Russia and China first.
Standing armies have been our downfall because they gave the excuse for things like CIA and many more. I know that it is always a difficult thing to weigh the difference between wanting a good & strong military and wanting a genuine liberty loving republic but with everything I have seen I think the cost of having standing armies just isn't worth it.
That said if we were going to disband our military this isn't how I would have liked to have gone about it.
Being toothless would just make you a target to other powers. Beside, during peace times, the army also helps poorer people get degrees and make something of themselves.
The goal and the method are contraindicated.
Classically speaking.
Not having a standing army doesn't mean toothless. If an army is needed for some conflict, just put out a call to arms. If no one cares to take up arms, then that's it, conflict over before it starts. This potential danger is very scary to some, but it also means you don't get thrown in jail when refusing to participate in a useless foreign conflict.
I don't think the army should be treated as a welfare program. It creates an incentive to put the army to use when not necessary (that is, an incentive to create conflicts where there were none), because it's sucking up so much money.
I'd be fine with a "well-regulated militia" in each state, like the national guard, and then the states have offices to coordinate and train for joint responses. Something closer to NATO between the states. But they should work closely with the actual militia, you and me.
How can faggots seriously claim to be oppressed in the west when the formerly strongest military on the planet does everything in its power to pander to them?
Your job is to uphold the constitution and kill its enemies foreign and domestic. Not integrate the ideology of the domestic enemies.
Humiliation is the goal. They don't want soldiers to be viewed as high status.
"Retarded" doesn't even begin to describe this.
Also, I'm not an "ally." It's also not my job to "affirm" anyone else's "identity."
Cultist narcissists can fuck right off.
Sometimes I wonder if there's some long con. Its like my cynicism reaches a point where it does a full circle.
Blacks are more openly despised than ever due to openly backing them until the point that people are sick of them and everyone wants them gone.
Hispanics are being recruited into the country to take over the urban cities and they're slowly going more conservative.
The military is ditching the real Americans and embracing the deviants right before a possible war breaks out, as if there's a chance to get rid of them.
Fags and groomers of all types are out more than ever and the country is beginning to openly hate them as it should for being molesters and perverts.
I mean, the list goes on.
I'm not saying anything stupid like "trust the plan, goy"...but sometimes I wonder if its worth fighting against some of these things.