Kind of looks like that time Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was experimenting with mescaline.
As a human in this thread. What am I to care about? What is the point?
As for the MCU, everything was rather good. Right up until End Game. Which to me appeared to be a quick and dirty rewrite, for political reasons to confusing to understand. Though the key elements are, ESG funds, population control, virus of unspecified origin, vaccines of unknown reasons to exist and propagate, and """THE MESSAGE"""".
And that Tolkien lore has no place in the game. Such a weak cash grab. Belittles them both.
Right. I think the bigger problem is that Tolkien doesn't belong in Magic the Gathering.
Honestly, they lost me the day the abandoned Manna Burn.
So um. The warning is due to the monsters not being black? Or maybe it's the dog?
Full character list: https://silenthill.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Silent_Hill_2_Characters
The game consists of only 8 actual characters.
Couldn't we actually use more transparent fear mongering?
Do you want people to forget how stupid this all was?
How about we start with, which gun makers have ads with hot babes in them, and work backwards from there. Honestly since when has this been a thing to begin with?
There are so many levels to this. She's not dimensionally possibly. Which is fine in the context of fiction and video games. But this Leaves the narrative confused, and us wondering how that we as real people are to relate to this.
Holy crap. I think I've just contracte3d A.I.D.S!
You wouldn't want to drink our beer anyways.
That thing in the image is not 'gender neutral'.
It however is a confusing mess to look at.
Man you've got to get over your teenage crush.
Would you settle for "Immature cross dressing male"?
In Japan, there are two types of love hotels: those that are officially love hotels and those that are not officially love hotels. And love hotels, which are officially love hotels, are not for use by those under 18, and even those over 18, but not for high school students. This is true even for young children accompanied by their parents.
They mean for them, and their agendas. As laws are just tools, and you can use them both truthfully and in malice.
Versus a Kennedy, and Trump?
It was to lessen criticism. But who was first? Which news outlet is using the other as cover? Or were they conspiring?
I didn't make it through the second paragraph. That was enough for me.
Death sentence for word of mouth testimony?
I can't see a problem with that. And neither would that prostitute my Father refused to pay. And neither will the Mafia's extortion racketeers.
This is all just a great idea! Why one out of ten living witness will agree! As for the other nine? The dead have little to testify. As they were silenced.
Unmanned drones have no rights over international waters.
According to you, my bad attitude is one of asking Questions which makes me an internet bully. Fair enough. With that in mind, I too have come to conclusion on my opinion of you.
Did you read past that sentence?
Vanguard being private ≠ Blackrock's motives
In addition, I do not ask rhetorical Questions. And I do expect an answer to this one:
Which rules guidelines or laws do you think they are following to come to that conclusion?
Vanguard is not a public stock and is owned by its funds/customers. So no, Blackrock would have no reason to be a significant owner of Vanguard since that would mean being Vanguard's customer.
That logic doesn't follow:
Vanguard being private, does not equate to Blackrock not having a reason to invest in Vanguard. Nor does it shed light on their overlapping investments in each other meant to obscure ownership from the masses. Which rules guidelines or laws do you think they are following to come to that conclusion?
https://tenor.com/view/willy-wonka-really-huh-gif-15522979